Revision as of 09:13, 28 April 2016 editUtpal Jana (talk | contribs)4 edits ←Blanked the page← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:49, 29 April 2016 edit undoAA (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,256 editsm Reverted edits by Utpal Jana (talk) to last version by LianceNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''I'm currently in the process of re-assessing the usefulness of this tool.''' It may be replaced with something using the new <categorytree> syntax (although that doesn't have all of the functionality), or it might be deleted altogether. If you have any comments, please make them known on ]. --] 02:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
<noinclude> | |||
{{shortcut|WP:SDL|WP:LSD}} | |||
For the current number of CSD candidates, see {{diff|User:Cyde/List of candidates for speedy deletion/Subpage|last||the last edit}} to the subpage ({{history|User:Cyde/List of candidates for speedy deletion/Subpage|complete history}}). | |||
{{User:Cyde/List of candidates for speedy deletion/Subpage}} | |||
</noinclude> | |||
<includeonly> | |||
'''''The ] is not intended to be used for transclusion purposes. By doing so, you are creating many unnecessary "What links here" entries that administrators on CSD patrol have to peruse on each deletion. Think of the tiny benefit that transclusion affords you versus the large hindrance that it creates to many administrators each time every CSD is dealt with, and you will realize why it is no longer permitted.''''' | |||
</includeonly> |
Revision as of 16:49, 29 April 2016
I'm currently in the process of re-assessing the usefulness of this tool. It may be replaced with something using the new <categorytree> syntax (although that doesn't have all of the functionality), or it might be deleted altogether. If you have any comments, please make them known on the talk page. --Cyde Weys 02:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
For the current number of CSD candidates, see the last edit to the subpage (complete history).
This user subpage is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |