| Revision as of 12:07, 1 May 2016 editPadgriffin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers17,337 edits General note: Unconstructive editing on Mahdi Al Tajir. (TW) | Revision as of 12:09, 1 May 2016 edit undoPadgriffin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers17,337 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == May 2016 == | == May 2016 == | ||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of ] to ] has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] (]) 12:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC) | ] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of ] to ] has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] (]) 12:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 12:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:09, 1 May 2016
May 2016
Hello, I'm Clubjustin4. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mahdi Al Tajir has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Clubjustin (talk) 12:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Clubjustin (talk) 12:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)