| Revision as of 13:00, 26 August 2006 editTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 editsm Unprotected User talk:Weevlos: To enable posting of notice by non-admin← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:10, 26 August 2006 edit undoThatcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,287 edits MONGO arbitrationNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| Please do not make ] on other users as you did . It is a violation of our policies and repeated or egregious examples will get you blocked. --] 17:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC) | Please do not make ] on other users as you did . It is a violation of our policies and repeated or egregious examples will get you blocked. --] 17:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | |||
| Hello, | |||
| An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: ]. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, ]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ] 13:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| If you would like to post evidence to the case you can use the {{tl|unblock}} template to ask to be unblocked to participate. ] 13:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:10, 26 August 2006
Dear Weevlos
Welcome to the Internet's fastest growing community of encyclopedia editors!
Just a note to help you in your editing: you marked an edit to the article Bantown as a minor edit. The help page on minor edits states:
"Reverts to a disputed page are unlikely to be minor. When a page is disputed, and especially if an edit war is brewing or in full eruption, then it's better not to mark ANY edit as minor, unless you're sure that all other users will agree it's minor, like correcting a misspelling."
You should usually only mark an edit as minor when it's a simple correction of spelling or an obvious typo, or a change in formatting which doesn't affect the content of a page.
hth.
Via strass 03:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Careful
Be careful that your new sub-page does not become a soapbox. If I were you, I'd eliminate much of the commentary and make it more of a list/database format or you'll get blocked just like the others. Karwynn (talk) 18:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- I have contributed articles and edits in good faith to Misplaced Pages before and if I am blocked for civil criticism then it will merely cement the proof of abusive behavior by the people in question. --Weevlos 19:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments on AN/I
Please do not make personal attacks on other users as you did here. It is a violation of our policies and repeated or egregious examples will get you blocked. --CBD 17:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/MONGO
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/MONGO. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/MONGO/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/MONGO/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher131 (talk) 13:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
If you would like to post evidence to the case you can use the {{unblock}} template to ask to be unblocked to participate. Thatcher131 (talk) 13:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)