Revision as of 07:09, 28 May 2016 edit88.240.78.187 (talk) →Internet censorship map colours: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:10, 28 May 2016 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by 88.240.78.187 - "→Internet censorship map colours: new section"Next edit → | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
== Internet censorship map colours == | == Internet censorship map colours == | ||
Substantial, selective and not classified/no data are too close in colour, even if the map is blown up. | Substantial, selective and not classified/no data are too close in colour, even if the map is blown up. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 07:09, 28 May 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 07:10, 28 May 2016
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Censorship article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Censorship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120316121435/http://www.csecworldcongress.org/en/index.htm to http://www.csecworldcongress.org/en/index.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140421082325/http://mufti.penang.gov.my/index.php/en/fatwa/islamic-religious-administration-enactment-2004 to http://mufti.penang.gov.my/index.php/en/fatwa/islamic-religious-administration-enactment-2004
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—Talk to my owner:Online 22:00, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Censorship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080611034558/http://www.newseum.org:80/berlinwall/commissar_vanishes/vanishes.htm to http://www.newseum.org/berlinwall/commissar_vanishes/vanishes.htm
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/graham-ovenden-1730
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120323215225/http://march12.rsf.org:80/i/Report_EnemiesoftheInternet_2012.pdf to http://march12.rsf.org/i/Report_EnemiesoftheInternet_2012.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070804080018/http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0711-05.htm to http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0711-05.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—Talk to my owner:Online 22:05, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
New related category: Category:Censored media
Following up on the old discussion at Talk:Censorship/Archive_3#Censored_media_.2F_category_cleanup, I have created Category:Censored media. Please help populate. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Possible weasel words?
Part of the article says "There are many ways that censors exhibit creativity, but a specific variant is of concern in which censors rewrite texts, giving these texts secret co-authors."
Isn't 'there are many' weasel words in the same way 'many say' or 'it is commonly believed', without citation?116.93.23.41 (talk) 07:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Well, I think it's more precise, so it is probably fine. What I'd worry more is whether the claim is referenced. If it is we could check the original source. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 20:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- There's no reference mark on it, hmm. 116.93.23.41 (talk) 01:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Social Media Censorship
Hi KTJeno, the social media censorship part that you added looks good. I added a bit about why seeing disgruntled citizens' comments about certain elected officials can be good for the government who is doing the censoring, as well as provide a link to the video. You could maybe add more about why social media censorship can be viewed as good or bad to improve your section further. Kellytaft.144 (talk) 01:54, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Internet censorship map colours
Substantial, selective and not classified/no data are too close in colour, even if the map is blown up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.240.78.187 (talk) 07:09, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Freedom of speech articles
- High-importance Freedom of speech articles
- C-Class Human rights articles
- Mid-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- C-Class law articles
- Top-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Media articles
- Low-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- C-Class Journalism articles
- Top-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class ethics articles
- Low-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- C-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Low-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Pornography articles
- High-importance Pornography articles
- C-Class High-importance Pornography articles
- WikiProject Pornography articles