Revision as of 11:32, 4 June 2016 editSitush (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers260,192 edits →June 2016: more problems← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:27, 4 June 2016 edit undoKautilya3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,382 edits CommentNext edit → | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Canvassing people to do edits on your behalf (, ) isn't going to do you any favours. As has been explained to you before, you need to get ] on the article talk page. Furthermore, a news report from 2009 cannot possibly verify a statement relating to 2016 - was pointless. - ] (]) 11:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC) | Canvassing people to do edits on your behalf (, ) isn't going to do you any favours. As has been explained to you before, you need to get ] on the article talk page. Furthermore, a news report from 2009 cannot possibly verify a statement relating to 2016 - was pointless. - ] (]) 11:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
I should also warn you against spamming about ] at unrelated pages like ]. Every article has its own talk page, which is meant for discussing the content of that particular page. Please respect that. -- ] (]) 19:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:27, 4 June 2016
May 2016
Hi, Giridharmurthy100, welcome to Misplaced Pages. Please stop putting unsourced editing requests on Talk:Kapu (caste) and try to take on board what experienced editors tell you about Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Don't attack them when they do, as you did here. Discuss civilly. If you have no interest in our policies, as you imply here, you'll probably be happier contributing to a different type of site. Bishonen | talk 17:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC).
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.The above issued because you have just yet again repeated the same pointless edit request. Enough is enough. - Sitush (talk) 02:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Patel. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Sundayclose (talk) 16:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Canvassing people to do edits on your behalf (, ) isn't going to do you any favours. As has been explained to you before, you need to get consensus on the article talk page. Furthermore, a news report from 2009 cannot possibly verify a statement relating to 2016 - this was pointless. - Sitush (talk) 11:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
I should also warn you against spamming about Kapu (caste) at unrelated pages like Talk: Patel. Every article has its own talk page, which is meant for discussing the content of that particular page. Please respect that. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC)