Kancha Ilaiah: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 08:57, 29 August 2006 editIkonoblast (talk \| contribs)3,014 edits PLZ . quote who says← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:17, 29 August 2006 edit undoHkelkar (talk \| contribs)7,279 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{wikiquote}}'''Kancha Ilaiah''' is the Chairman of the Political Science department at ], a social activist and author. He is a major ideological figure in the movement that calls itself ], and is often labelled as ]~~{{fact}}~~ by his critics. He was born into ] Golla, an ']' (not ]) family on ] ] and was brought up in a small ] village. His family's main profession was sheep farming. He earned his doctorate degree in political science at the ] in ], ]. His Ph. D thesis was based on Gautama ]'s ].		{{wikiquote}}'''Kancha Ilaiah''' is the Chairman of the Political Science department at ], a social activist and author. He is a major ideological figure in the movement that calls itself ], and is often labelled as ] by his critics, both Hindu and Muslim <ref>[http://www.countercurrents.org/dalit-anand080603.htm Archive of "KR to Kalam Caste, Religion And
			The Indian Presidency", Himal Magazine]</ref>. He was born into ] Golla, an ']' (not ]) family on ] ] and was brought up in a small ] village. His family's main profession was sheep farming. He earned his doctorate degree in political science at the ] in ], ]. His Ph. D thesis was based on Gautama ]'s ].

	He is an outspoken activist in the ]-Bahujan (Scheduled and Backwards Castes) movement. He has criticized the practices of caste and untouchability. Recently he testified before a subcommittee ] against the practice of untouchability and urged the US Government to work with the Indian government to end what he said was the persecution of ], ], and other oppressed people groups in India. His description of the relationship between communities in India has been criticised by columnist ] as being biased and unrepresentative .		He is an outspoken activist in the ]-Bahujan (Scheduled and Backwards Castes) movement. He has criticized the practices of caste and untouchability. Recently he testified before a subcommittee ] against the practice of untouchability and urged the US Government to work with the Indian government to end what he said was the persecution of ], ], and other oppressed people groups in India. His description of the relationship between communities in India has been criticised by columnist ] as being biased and unrepresentative .
Line 14:		Line 15:
	*''Buffalo Nationalism--A critique of spiritual fascism''		*''Buffalo Nationalism--A critique of spiritual fascism''

	His book, ''Why I Am Not A Hindu'' has been a best-seller in India and is widely read around the world. However, it has also drawn severe condemnations from ] and ] ], who note that the book reflects a shallow understanding of Hindu religion and blissful ignorance of all positive aspects of its philosophy and mythology.		His book, ''Why I Am Not A Hindu'' has been a best-seller in India and is widely read around the world. However, it has also drawn severe condemnations from ] and ] ], who note that the book reflects a shallow understanding of Hindu religion and blissful ignorance of all positive aspects of its philosophy and mythology. In particular, ] criticizes the book as unfairly biased and portraying Hinduism in an exceptional light as discriminatory, while ignoring similar discriminations in other cultures. He writes:

			<blockquote>
			"(Why I am not a Hindu) offers a description of the differences in life style between upper castes and Shudras, with the declared intention of getting the reader indignated at the injustice and absurdity of the typically Hindu castle system. Yet, his testimony unwittingly shows just how similar Hindu caste inequality is to the social inequality in other societies, e.g. Ilaiah’s repeated observation that women are more controlled in upper castes and more assertive and free in lower castes is or was just as true for Confucian China or the feudal and bourgeois societies of Europe <ref>"</ref>.
			</blockquote>

	The book basically explains the life-experience of the Dalits and Other Backward Castes and alleges that their poverty-ridden experience holds little connection to the Brahmin religious experience. By explaining this dichotomy from his own personal experience as an OBC, he advocates the "Dalitization" of Indian culture. As Ilaiah claims, the Dalit philosophy prizes productivity over personal pleasure and values the graciousness of community over the "elevation of Brahmin men" at the expense of women and Dalits/OBCs. Ilaiah asserts that this shift in societal thinking will enable India to become a more prosperous and egalitarian society.		The book basically explains the life-experience of the Dalits and Other Backward Castes and alleges that their poverty-ridden experience holds little connection to the Brahmin religious experience. By explaining this dichotomy from his own personal experience as an OBC, he advocates the "Dalitization" of Indian culture. As Ilaiah claims, the Dalit philosophy prizes productivity over personal pleasure and values the graciousness of community over the "elevation of Brahmin men" at the expense of women and Dalits/OBCs. Ilaiah asserts that this shift in societal thinking will enable India to become a more prosperous and egalitarian society.
Line 21:		Line 26:


			==References==

			<div class="references-small">
			<references/>
			</div>
	==External links==		==External links==

Revision as of 09:17, 29 August 2006

Kancha Ilaiah is the Chairman of the Political Science department at Osmania University, a social activist and author. He is a major ideological figure in the movement that calls itself Anti-Brahmanism, and is often labelled as anti-Hindu by his critics, both Hindu and Muslim . He was born into Kuruma Golla, an 'other backward caste' (not dalit) family on October 5 1952 and was brought up in a small south Indian village. His family's main profession was sheep farming. He earned his doctorate degree in political science at the Osmania University in Hyderabad, India. His Ph. D thesis was based on Gautama Buddha's political philosophy.

He is an outspoken activist in the Dalit-Bahujan (Scheduled and Backwards Castes) movement. He has criticized the practices of caste and untouchability. Recently he testified before a subcommittee U.S. Congress against the practice of untouchability and urged the US Government to work with the Indian government to end what he said was the persecution of Muslims, Christians, and other oppressed people groups in India. His description of the relationship between communities in India has been criticised by columnist Francois Gautier as being biased and unrepresentative .

He joined hands in this campaign with the All India Christian Council, headed by Dr. Joseph D'Souza and other Indian Christian activists . Ilaiah and D'Souza are associated with the USA based Dalit Freedom Network, a charitable organization working for the rights of India's Dalits - believed by some to promote aggressive missionary activities - which actively participated in the Californian Hindu textbook controversy, opposing edits proposed by Hindu advocacy groups and scholars. They believed that the edits promoted a "biased Brahminical view".

According to Joseph D'Souza, Kancha Ilaiah has served as the "influential ideologue" for the "Quit Hinduism" movement leading to a mass rally on Dec 6th, 2002 .

He is the author of several books written in English, including

Why I Am Not a Hindu: A Sudra critique of Hindutva philosophy, culture and political economy
God as Political Philosopher--Buddha's Challenge to Brahminism
Democracy in India --- A Hollow Shell (edited by Arthur Bonner)
Buffalo Nationalism--A critique of spiritual fascism

His book, Why I Am Not A Hindu has been a best-seller in India and is widely read around the world. However, it has also drawn severe condemnations from Hindus and Hinduism experts, who note that the book reflects a shallow understanding of Hindu religion and blissful ignorance of all positive aspects of its philosophy and mythology. In particular, Koenraad Elst criticizes the book as unfairly biased and portraying Hinduism in an exceptional light as discriminatory, while ignoring similar discriminations in other cultures. He writes:

"(Why I am not a Hindu) offers a description of the differences in life style between upper castes and Shudras, with the declared intention of getting the reader indignated at the injustice and absurdity of the typically Hindu castle system. Yet, his testimony unwittingly shows just how similar Hindu caste inequality is to the social inequality in other societies, e.g. Ilaiah’s repeated observation that women are more controlled in upper castes and more assertive and free in lower castes is or was just as true for Confucian China or the feudal and bourgeois societies of Europe .

The book basically explains the life-experience of the Dalits and Other Backward Castes and alleges that their poverty-ridden experience holds little connection to the Brahmin religious experience. By explaining this dichotomy from his own personal experience as an OBC, he advocates the "Dalitization" of Indian culture. As Ilaiah claims, the Dalit philosophy prizes productivity over personal pleasure and values the graciousness of community over the "elevation of Brahmin men" at the expense of women and Dalits/OBCs. Ilaiah asserts that this shift in societal thinking will enable India to become a more prosperous and egalitarian society.

Ilaiah is a controversial figure because of what some have called rabidly anti-Brahmin rhetoric and hypocritical methods of argument.

References

[http://www.countercurrents.org/dalit-anand080603.htm Archive of "KR to Kalam Caste, Religion And The Indian Presidency", Himal Magazine]
Update on teh Aryan Invasion Debate (footnote 75)"

Misplaced Pages