| Revision as of 21:48, 6 March 2003 editStevertigo (talk | contribs)43,174 editsmNo edit summary | Revision as of 21:49, 6 March 2003 edit undoSusan Mason (talk | contribs)1,955 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''9-11 |
'''The 9-11 Domestic Consipracy Theory''' is a ] advocated by certain ] in which it is argued that] knew, in advance, about the ]. | ||
| Theorists often go on to argue that Bush actually supported the attacks as they would provide an excuse to launch the ]. (See also: ]) Advocates of this theory often argue that, on the day of the ] attacks, ]i workers were warned not to go to work at the ] and that key government officials were warned not to fly on aircraft heading through ] and ] airspace. Advocates also argue that Bush has not allowed a proper investigation of the attacks. | Theorists often go on to argue that Bush actually supported the attacks as they would provide an excuse to launch the ]. (See also: ]) Advocates of this theory often argue that, on the day of the ] attacks, ]i workers were warned not to go to work at the ] and that key government officials were warned not to fly on aircraft heading through ] and ] airspace. Advocates also argue that Bush has not allowed a proper investigation of the attacks. | ||
Revision as of 21:49, 6 March 2003
The 9-11 Domestic Consipracy Theory is a conspiracy theory advocated by certain political groups in which it is argued thatGeorge W. Bush knew, in advance, about the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks.
Theorists often go on to argue that Bush actually supported the attacks as they would provide an excuse to launch the War on Terrorism. (See also: Operation Northwoods) Advocates of this theory often argue that, on the day of the terrorst attacks, Israeli workers were warned not to go to work at the World Trade Center and that key government officials were warned not to fly on aircraft heading through New York and Washington airspace. Advocates also argue that Bush has not allowed a proper investigation of the attacks.
These views are regarded by most people as having no basis in fact.
See also: