Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Hans-Babo von Rohr: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:06, 26 June 2016 editAustralianRupert (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled102,914 edits Hans-Babo von Rohr: + comment about notifying author← Previous edit Revision as of 23:29, 26 June 2016 edit undoDocYako (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,107 edits Hans-Babo von RohrNext edit →
Line 22: Line 22:
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 09:32, 26 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> <small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 09:32, 26 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
* Not sure if you have already, but I have notified the author of the article, DocYako, that the article is being discussed at AfD. I would encourage you to do this for your other AfDs, too, if the article creator is currently active and if you haven't already done so. Regards, ] (]) 13:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC) * Not sure if you have already, but I have notified the author of the article, DocYako, that the article is being discussed at AfD. I would encourage you to do this for your other AfDs, too, if the article creator is currently active and if you haven't already done so. Regards, ] (]) 13:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
* When I first created the article I thought that it met the basic guidelines of notability as he was a Knight's Cross recipient and the Knight's Cross was a high decoration for valour during World War II. I you want to delete it then be prepared to delete other entries about American and British servicemen who were also awarded decorations with less cites/references.
] (]) 23:27, 26 June 2016

Revision as of 23:29, 26 June 2016

Hans-Babo von Rohr

Hans-Babo von Rohr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG; while the subject received the Knight's Cross, Google books search does not produce meaningful results. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:05, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep: that remains to be seen. As a recipient of the Knight's Cross, he meets WP:SOLDIER, and while that does not trump WP:GNG, it should be accepted as a guide on whether it will meet GNG if sufficient effort is made to locate reliable sources. Certainly there are several standard references on the Knight's Cross that must mention this man and his award, the date it was received and what role he was performing when awarded it. Google Books searches are a very blunt instrument, and I would not delete an article on that basis alone, particularly as there are sources that mention him and the award. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Separately, as was suggested on my Talk page, I am including a 2015 version of the article, before I edited it; however, it does not appear to look much different.
While the Knight's Cross was a prestigious award, it was not the highest grade (there ware Oak Leaves, Swords, Diamonds, etc). Moreover, the GNG still needs to be met, through multiple verifiable independent, reliable sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Even if your assessment of the reliability of the sources in your Google Books search was accepted, have you checked the German Encyclopedia of Biography? Subjects are also more likely to have information available in their native language, and Google Books is a blunt instrument with English-speaking subjects, let alone non-English-speaking ones. Not enough effort has been demonstrated to justify deleting this article. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the suggestion re: Neue Deutsche Biographie, which I checked. There is no entry in the encyclopedia. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 03:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. North America 03:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America 03:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America 03:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 09:32, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Not sure if you have already, but I have notified the author of the article, DocYako, that the article is being discussed at AfD. I would encourage you to do this for your other AfDs, too, if the article creator is currently active and if you haven't already done so. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 13:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
  • When I first created the article I thought that it met the basic guidelines of notability as he was a Knight's Cross recipient and the Knight's Cross was a high decoration for valour during World War II. I you want to delete it then be prepared to delete other entries about American and British servicemen who were also awarded decorations with less cites/references.

UserDocYako:DocYako (talk) 23:27, 26 June 2016

Categories: