Misplaced Pages

:Files for deletion/2006 August 30: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:24, 30 August 2006 editYtny (talk | contribs)10,017 editsm fixing← Previous edit Revision as of 02:27, 30 August 2006 edit undoBunchofgrapes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,802 edits Keep in More Cowbell. That animation really explores the space.Next edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
:Great image; much vilified by unsigned editor. Image substituted without consensus. If it's deleted I will be quitting the project forever! ] 01:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC) :Great image; much vilified by unsigned editor. Image substituted without consensus. If it's deleted I will be quitting the project forever! ] 01:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
::Please tell me you're kidding. At any rate, I have put it back in the ] article where it more or less makes sense to have it ... if it ever makes sense to have an animated image. I think, though, that in the ] article itself, where no context for the cowbell skit is given, the animated image is overkill. Whether it belongs in ] or not is questionable, but considering that ]'s removal was initially reverted and you've expressed a concern here, I think the issue needs to be decided on ], not on IFD. ] 01:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC) ::Please tell me you're kidding. At any rate, I have put it back in the ] article where it more or less makes sense to have it ... if it ever makes sense to have an animated image. I think, though, that in the ] article itself, where no context for the cowbell skit is given, the animated image is overkill. Whether it belongs in ] or not is questionable, but considering that ]'s removal was initially reverted and you've expressed a concern here, I think the issue needs to be decided on ], not on IFD. ] 01:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
:Keep in ]. That animation really explores the space. &mdash;] (]) 02:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
*''']''' <span class="plainlinks"><sup id="Image:Image:DejanStankovic.jpg"> </sup> '''(]''' | ''')'''<br> *''']''' <span class="plainlinks"><sup id="Image:Image:DejanStankovic.jpg"> </sup> '''(]''' | ''')'''<br>
:Uploaded by ] ( | ]).</span> '''OR''', ] had asked not to upload photos from the site. ] 02:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC) :Uploaded by ] ( | ]).</span> '''OR''', ] had asked not to upload photos from the site. ] 02:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:27, 30 August 2006

< August 29 August 31 >

August 30

Uploaded by El C (notify | contribs). Animated gif unencyclopedic and visually obnoxious. A non-animated version (Image:Cowbell2.jpg) has been uploaded and substituted in the articles where this image was used.

Great image; much vilified by unsigned editor. Image substituted without consensus. If it's deleted I will be quitting the project forever! El_C 01:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Please tell me you're kidding. At any rate, I have put it back in the More Cowbell article where it more or less makes sense to have it ... if it ever makes sense to have an animated image. I think, though, that in the SNL article itself, where no context for the cowbell skit is given, the animated image is overkill. Whether it belongs in More Cowbell or not is questionable, but considering that User:Peter G Werner's removal was initially reverted and you've expressed a concern here, I think the issue needs to be decided on Talk:More Cowbell, not on IFD. BigDT 01:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Keep in More Cowbell. That animation really explores the space. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 02:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Uploaded by Zvonko (notify | contribs). OR, User talk:Soccer-europe.com had asked not to upload photos from the site. Ytny 02:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)