Misplaced Pages

talk:Two versions: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:46, 3 September 2004 editVeryVerily (talk | contribs)11,749 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 03:54, 1 October 2004 edit undoSilverback (talk | contribs)6,113 edits reversion/non-reversion wars can be handled more simplyNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


:This looks a hell of a lot better than . ]] 21:46, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC) :This looks a hell of a lot better than . ]] 21:46, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

== reversion/non-reversion wars can be handled more simply ==

Perhaps instead of two versions, the reversion/non-reversion wars can be temporarily handled by having the proposed reversion present but highlighted in red, with a notice in red to note that the text is being disputed by proposing reversion and not by proposing balancing text.--] 03:54, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:54, 1 October 2004

Oppose. Misplaced Pages should not have warring versions of articles. RickK 21:14, Sep 3, 2004 (UTC)

But it does. The hope is to make it more peaceable. VV 21:44, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
This looks a hell of a lot better than this. VV 21:46, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

reversion/non-reversion wars can be handled more simply

Perhaps instead of two versions, the reversion/non-reversion wars can be temporarily handled by having the proposed reversion present but highlighted in red, with a notice in red to note that the text is being disputed by proposing reversion and not by proposing balancing text.--Silverback 03:54, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)