| Revision as of 13:43, 30 August 2006 editIlir pz (talk | contribs)2,168 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:12, 31 August 2006 edit undoNagromtpc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,969 edits arbitrationNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| Why am I so suspicious that you are just another sockpuppet of someone? why do I see the same type of description of who you are as I've seen in many other "neutral" editors around here, who are some Scandinavians (read: innocent, and civillized people who have nothing to do with Kosovo) and suprisingly ALL their edits are somehow related to Kosovo? Only a fool could be fooled by such tricks :) enjoy wasting your time, dude! ] 13:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | Why am I so suspicious that you are just another sockpuppet of someone? why do I see the same type of description of who you are as I've seen in many other "neutral" editors around here, who are some Scandinavians (read: innocent, and civillized people who have nothing to do with Kosovo) and suprisingly ALL their edits are somehow related to Kosovo? Only a fool could be fooled by such tricks :) enjoy wasting your time, dude! ] 13:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Arbitration request on Kosovo == | |||
| Dear Editor, since you have been involved in editing the ] article in the last months, and that article has been the subject of long ongoing edit wars, your name is listed in the ] on this matter. You can make a statement here: ]. Due to the large number of editors involved, however, I would to ask you to keep your statement concise and to the point. If you feel you have not been substantially involved in the disputes surrounding the ] article, please do not remove your name from the Arbitration request, but rather make a short statement there explaining why you feel you have not been involved enough to be part it. To understand my reasons for requesting Arbitration, please read my statement on the Requests for Arbitration page. Best regards, ] 10:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:12, 31 August 2006
License tagging for Image:Prishtinalogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Prishtinalogo.jpg. Misplaced Pages gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Misplaced Pages, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 12:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Kosovo
Please see my reply to your comments on Talk:Kosovo! -- ChrisO 22:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Kosovo etc
Tony, I notice that you've been editing using a variety of names and IP addresses. Could you pick one account or IP address, please (preferably an account) that you want to edit from and stick to it? That makes it easier to work out who is making the edits. Also, it would be helpful if you could review our policies WP:NPA and WP:CIV, and concentrate on content in future, rather than commenting on contributors. When you've decided, perhaps you could let me know which account you've chosen. Many thanks, SlimVirgin 20:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Skopje
Skopje has a nice paragraph at the beginning about its name. I don't know why people can't decide what to do about Durres, but a paragraph like Skopje would be a good solution. Adam Bishop 15:26, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the appreciation Tony, unfortunately I am losing my faith in a good solution a bit at the moment, since a new revert war has started, instigated by the flag/coat of arms discussion. Nevertheless, I'll keep an eye on the Kosovo article and try to find a ways of keeping people from revert-warring. Happy editing! --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 11:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Suspicious as hell
Why am I so suspicious that you are just another sockpuppet of someone? why do I see the same type of description of who you are as I've seen in many other "neutral" editors around here, who are some Scandinavians (read: innocent, and civillized people who have nothing to do with Kosovo) and suprisingly ALL their edits are somehow related to Kosovo? Only a fool could be fooled by such tricks :) enjoy wasting your time, dude! ilir_pz 13:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Arbitration request on Kosovo
Dear Editor, since you have been involved in editing the Kosovo article in the last months, and that article has been the subject of long ongoing edit wars, your name is listed in the Request for Arbitration on this matter. You can make a statement here: Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration#Kosovo. Due to the large number of editors involved, however, I would to ask you to keep your statement concise and to the point. If you feel you have not been substantially involved in the disputes surrounding the Kosovo article, please do not remove your name from the Arbitration request, but rather make a short statement there explaining why you feel you have not been involved enough to be part it. To understand my reasons for requesting Arbitration, please read my statement on the Requests for Arbitration page. Best regards, Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 10:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)