| Revision as of 18:55, 31 August 2006 editOmphaloscope (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,839 editsm typo← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:27, 31 August 2006 edit undo68.39.174.238 (talk) I think it's been clarified.Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Continuing jurisdiction may involve monitoring of the editing of articles over a period of time and the application of restrictions on editing by users who engage in edit warring or other disruptive behavior. This gives an opportunity for users who have edit warred or disrupted the article in the past by tendentious editing to change their behavior to more productive modes. | Continuing jurisdiction may involve monitoring of the editing of articles over a period of time and the application of restrictions on editing by users who engage in edit warring or other disruptive behavior. This gives an opportunity for users who have edit warred or disrupted the article in the past by tendentious editing to change their behavior to more productive modes. | ||
| When the Committee believes that the articlel is no longer subject to the disputes which lead to the probation, it may revoke probation by passing a "[[WP:RFAR#Motions in prior cases|motion in a prior case". | |||
| ==Template== | ==Template== | ||
Revision as of 22:27, 31 August 2006
Shortcut- ]
Articles which are the focus of dispute that comes before the Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee may be placed on article probation. The usual reason is the dispute in question results in point of view editing, sustained edit warring, or other quality and policy issues. The Committee may continue to exercise jurisdiction over such articles until the major problems with the articles have been resolved by the Misplaced Pages editing process.
| Dispute resolution (Requests) |
|---|
| Tips |
| Content disputes |
| Conduct disputes |
This remedy permits more flexibility with legitimate articles which have serious problems, and allows more effective resolution of disputes where the articel is more in need of improvement then the disputants of sanctions. The Arbitration Committee may make recommendations regarding improvement of articles but shall not involve themselves with content issues.
Continuing jurisdiction may involve monitoring of the editing of articles over a period of time and the application of restrictions on editing by users who engage in edit warring or other disruptive behavior. This gives an opportunity for users who have edit warred or disrupted the article in the past by tendentious editing to change their behavior to more productive modes.
When the Committee believes that the articlel is no longer subject to the disputes which lead to the probation, it may revoke probation by passing a "[[WP:RFAR#Motions in prior cases|motion in a prior case".
Template
The template {{article probation}} is normally placed on the talk page of the article under probation. It may alternatively be used on the article page itself.
Arbitration cases ordering probation
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Election
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Francis Schuckardt
Pages under probation
Can be seen at Category:Articles on probation
Category: