| Revision as of 16:17, 7 August 2016 editLouisAragon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers71,805 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on Yerevan. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:51, 7 August 2016 edit undoClass455 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,656 edits Warning: Edit warring on Yerevan. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''-''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 16:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC) | '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''-''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 16:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
| Please be particularly aware that ] states: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> '''] (])''' 16:51, 7 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:51, 7 August 2016
HyeSK, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi HyeSK! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 19:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC) |
Formal mediation has been requested
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Listing spellings of Armenian items in Western and Eastern Armenian.". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 25 May 2016.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 15:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected
The request for formal mediation concerning Listing spellings of Armenian items in Western and Eastern Armenian., to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
June 2016
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Duduk has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU 22:26, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Duduk
1.) I'm Armenian 2.) The official name is Duduk, everyone calls it a Duduk, Armenians call it a Duduk. Why change the name to Tsiranapogh? Ninetoyadome (talk) 23:13, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
The official name is not duduk. The official name is tsiranapogh. Duduk is only used as it's more common, especially on the world stage. My apologies for labeling you without asking. That's not my style. G'nerek. HyeSK (talk) 23:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)HyeSK
- You can post it in the talk page and see what others have to say. The reason i reverted is because everyone knows it as the Duduk. You can add to it "also known as the tsiranapokh." http://www.unesco.org/culture/intangible-heritage/03eur_uk.htm Ninetoyadome (talk) 23:39, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Instead I wrote it as "also known as the duduk". UNESCO has a gift of misrepresenting items. There is an Armenian monastery set to be added to the list and they are calling it a Byzantine monastery. HyeSK (talk) 13:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)HyeSK
June 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Duduk. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Class455fan1 (talk) 17:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
AA alert
Hi, since you edit Armenia-Azerbaijan related articles, the following info might be helpful. Regards, Grandmaster 15:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Duduk has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU 19:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
How is it not constructive? Rather than just making a change, give a reason. I reverted to the instrument's true name. HyeSK (talk) 19:34, 27 June 2016 (UTC)HyeSK
June 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Duduk. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Class455fan1 (talk) 19:44, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:HyeSK reported by User:Class455fan1 (Result: ). Thank you. Class455fan1 (talk) 19:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- The edit warring complaint about Duduk has been closed with a warning to you. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:31, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
August 2016
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Armenian Genocide for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:43, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Yerevan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
- LouisAragon (talk) 16:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Yerevan. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Class455fan1 (talk) 16:51, 7 August 2016 (UTC)