Misplaced Pages

Destructive fishing practices: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:36, 11 November 2014 editAnna Frodesiak (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users117,216 edits + see also item: List of harvested aquatic animals by weight← Previous edit Revision as of 15:06, 10 August 2016 edit undoLilHelpa (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers413,638 editsm wikify, minor copy editNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
{{lead rewrite|date=September 2009}} {{lead rewrite|date=September 2009}}
}} }}
The phrase '''destructive fishing practices''' (or DFPs) has been featured in international fisheries literature for around three decades. No widely accepted definition of the phrase exists, and this will almost certainly remain the situation, given very different national and industry perspectives. The DFPs with the most standing is that of the Fisheries and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - the . The phrase '''destructive fishing practices''' (or DFPs) has been featured in international fisheries literature since about the 1980s. No widely accepted definition of the phrase exists, and this will almost certainly remain the situation, given very different national and industry perspectives. The DFPs with the most standing are those of the Fisheries and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - the .


The Outcomes and Implementation Statements of the ''World Summit on Sustainable Development'', held in Johannesburg in 2002, contain a commitment to phasing out destructive fishing practices in the marine environment by the year 2012. All nations attending the summit supported this statement. The Outcomes and Implementation Statements of the ''World Summit on Sustainable Development'', held in Johannesburg in 2002, contain a commitment to phasing out destructive fishing practices in the marine environment by the year 2012. All nations attending the summit supported this statement.


Many nations had made commitments to end destructive fishing practices much earlier. In 1999, 124 nations explicitly gave their support to the FAO ''Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries 1995'' through the Rome Declaration on Responsible Fisheries. The list of these nations includes most of the major fishing nations of the world. However, while the Code of Conduct contains a commitment to end destructive fishing practices, the Code contains no time-lines. Many nations had made commitments to end destructive fishing practices much earlier. In 1999, 124 nations explicitly gave their support to the FAO ''Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries 1995'' through the Rome Declaration on Responsible Fisheries. The list of these nations includes most of the major fishing nations of the world. However, while the Code of Conduct contains a commitment to end destructive fishing practices, the Code contains no timelines.


The narrowest definition of destructive fishing practices refers principally to bottom trawling over vulnerable habitat (shallow ]s, deep sea corals, or ], for example), as well as practices such as shark-finning, blast-fishing, poison-fishing, ], and push-netting. These latter practices are not significant within the fishing zones of most developed nations, being generally outlawed. Bottom trawling over vulnerable habitat, however, will continue within the Exclusive Fishing Zones of most nations until governments have mapped the location of vulnerable habitats, and taken steps to exclude all bottom trawling activities from these areas. The narrowest definition of destructive fishing practices refers principally to bottom trawling over vulnerable habitat (shallow ]s, deep sea corals, or ], for example), as well as practices such as ], ], poison fishing, ], and ]ting. These latter practices are not significant within the fishing zones of most developed nations, being generally outlawed. ] over vulnerable habitat, however, will continue within the Exclusive Fishing Zones of most nations until governments have mapped the location of vulnerable habitats, and taken steps to exclude all bottom trawling activities from these areas.


A wider and more useful definition would include: A wider and more useful definition would include:
* overfishing beyond reasonable recovery limits, including serial overfishing; * ] beyond reasonable recovery limits, including serial overfishing;
* excessive or damaging levels of bycatch ; * excessive or damaging levels of bycatch ;
* the fishing of spawning aggregations without precautionary justification ; * the fishing of spawning aggregations without precautionary justification ;

Revision as of 15:06, 10 August 2016

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Misplaced Pages editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (October 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article needs attention from an expert on the subject. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article.
When placing this tag, consider associating this request with a WikiProject. (October 2008)
The article's lead section may need to be rewritten. Please help improve the lead and read the lead layout guide. (September 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)

The phrase destructive fishing practices (or DFPs) has been featured in international fisheries literature since about the 1980s. No widely accepted definition of the phrase exists, and this will almost certainly remain the situation, given very different national and industry perspectives. The DFPs discussed with the most standing are those of the Fisheries and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - the FAO.

The Outcomes and Implementation Statements of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, held in Johannesburg in 2002, contain a commitment to phasing out destructive fishing practices in the marine environment by the year 2012. All nations attending the summit supported this statement.

Many nations had made commitments to end destructive fishing practices much earlier. In 1999, 124 nations explicitly gave their support to the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries 1995 through the Rome Declaration on Responsible Fisheries. The list of these nations includes most of the major fishing nations of the world. However, while the Code of Conduct contains a commitment to end destructive fishing practices, the Code contains no timelines.

The narrowest definition of destructive fishing practices refers principally to bottom trawling over vulnerable habitat (shallow corals, deep sea corals, or seagrass, for example), as well as practices such as shark finning, blast fishing, poison fishing, muroami, and push netting. These latter practices are not significant within the fishing zones of most developed nations, being generally outlawed. Bottom trawling over vulnerable habitat, however, will continue within the Exclusive Fishing Zones of most nations until governments have mapped the location of vulnerable habitats, and taken steps to exclude all bottom trawling activities from these areas.

A wider and more useful definition would include:

  • overfishing beyond reasonable recovery limits, including serial overfishing;
  • excessive or damaging levels of bycatch ;
  • the fishing of spawning aggregations without precautionary justification ;
  • intensive fishing over vulnerable habitats, including for example spawning and nursery areas; and
  • highgrading–the practice of discarding the lower quality portion of the target catch.

This definition could be extended to cover activities such as:

  • ghost fishing by lost or discarded gear,
  • shark netting of popular swimming beaches (with high incidental catch),
  • amateur use of fish aggregating devices or traps where they increase the likelihood of locally unsustainable catch levels,
  • spearfishing at night or with SCUBA, as well as 'industrial' spearfishing,
  • use of stainless steel hooks or traps;
  • commercial and recreational use of gill nets and traps with high incidental kill, and
  • deliberate (and sometimes illegal) destruction of marine life perceived as “getting in the way” of fishing operations .

See also

References

External links

Fishery science topics
Fisheries science and wild fisheries
Fisheries
science
Wild
fisheries
Fisheries law, management, sustainability and conservation
Law
Management
Sustainability
Conservation
Advocacy
Related issues
Categories: