Talk:KAI T-50 Golden Eagle: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 11:58, 10 June 2016 editSineBot (talk \| contribs)Bots2,555,593 editsm Signing comment by 132.3.49.79 - "→F-20 Tigershark lineage: new section"← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:19, 12 August 2016 edit undoGreenC bot (talk \| contribs)Bots2,548,645 edits →Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page: spelling: necessaryily -> necessarilyNext edit →
Line 48:		Line 48:
	Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.		Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
	Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Misplaced Pages.		Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Misplaced Pages.
	This, however, doesn't ~~necessaryily~~ mean it's spam, or not a good link.		This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
	If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the ].		If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the ].
	If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the ].		If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the ].

Revision as of 15:19, 12 August 2016

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the KAI T-50 Golden Eagle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / Asian / Korean / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Asian military history task force
	Korean military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not Israel

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/lieberman-refused-to-have-luggage-checked-at-south-korea-s-airport-1.419230 During his visit, Lieberman's also surprised his South Korean hosts when he said Israel is still considering purchasing South Korean training planes for the Israeli Air Force. "The option is still open," Lieberman told reporters in Seoul.

So you can see that Israel is NOT considering the T-50 anymore. Hcobb (talk) 21:00, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

T-50 comparison

I want to see a good empirical precedence for having no comparison lists for T-50 when they exist for all three of T-50's related aircraft, apparently even after considerable period of time since the supposed conclusion of the discussion pertaining to that. I was unlucky enough to have missed it. I'd appreciate it if someone could provide a link to that discussion here. Desagwan (talk) 16:07, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/General_Dynamics_F-16_Fighting_Falcon#See_also
http://en.wikipedia.org/AIDC_F-CK-1_Ching-kuo#See_also
http://en.wikipedia.org/Mitsubishi_F-2#See_also

A new discussion is being held at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Aircraft which you are welcome to contribute. MilborneOne (talk) 16:19, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

See the archived discussion there for the agreement to remove the list here. -Fnlayson (talk) 04:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Phil acquisition source

I post here actual article - link to article - it doesn't mention they signded deal or order planes, but i don't know if such "source" can be used in article, so i leave it in here so everyone knew current status of this purchase. --SojerPL (talk) 11:33, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Definitely not to be included for use, as it looks more like a procurement push by the PAF, which is a layman term for "Ongoing negotiations". The fact that "Phil officials said that they would like to have two of T/A-50s in country immediately to begin pilot training" is nothing short of telling the whole world that all their S-211s are now out of service and thus cannot be sortied, I also seriously don't think that the Koreans (or KAI for that matter) would specially rush off two aircraft from their assembly line to the PAF when they themselves have got a higher priority/commitment to the ROKAF and/or the TNI-AU since both are already confirmed deals with actual money being allocated to the procurement process. In short, what JDW's correspondent in Manila is getting are nothing but just "noises" from the local politicians, designed to coerce the Koreans in the ongoing negotiation. Note that I have removed the input pending more reports from the official Korean negotiation team, their press release will not lie. --Dave 16:32, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

The entry only said they selected the TA-50. The order part was previously removed by SojerPL. I readded the text in the Op history section and removed the 2 aircraft in 2012 part because of your point and other reasons. Jane's online article is shown in the linked image above if anyone is wondering. -Fnlayson (talk) 17:33, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, I can see that the Koreans didn't lie after all. TBH, I'm not sure why these Pinay editors are so overzealous about the deal when both government are not even in the final negotiation process. Quoted from Crimson Tide: "A long time ago, when the Russians roll out their rockets, the Yanks learnt to not go to Defcon 2/3 until the Russians actually start to fuel their birds. Gentlemen, you don't unzip you fly unless you're ready to f***!" --Dave 01:12, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Misplaced Pages. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/t-50/
Triggered by \bairforce-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II _Online 13:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II _Online 20:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on KAI T-50 Golden Eagle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110514083748/http://www.aviaciontotal.cl:80/2011/03/interes-de-espana-en-el-entrenador-kai-t-50/ to http://www.aviaciontotal.cl/2011/03/interes-de-espana-en-el-entrenador-kai-t-50

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

F-20 Tigershark lineage

The aircraft is not largely derived from the F-16, but rather from the F-20. The only design component in common with the F-16 is the wing. For anyone at all familiar with of the 70s and 80s, this design's origins in the F-20 are fairly obvious. Nearly the entire aircraft, from the engine inlets, the curve and geometry of the jet inlets, the tailplane, the landing gear, etc, is identical to the F-20. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.3.49.79 (talk) 11:58, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Categories: