| Revision as of 12:46, 3 September 2006 edit84.174.218.119 (talk) rm bizarrely pov statement← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:57, 3 September 2006 edit undo84.174.218.119 (talk) rev the pov stuff by the last user to the last normal versionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Emil Kraepelin''' (] ]–] ]) was a ] ] who attempted to create a synthesis of the hundreds of mental disorders classified by the 19th century, grouping diseases together based on classification of common ''patterns'' of symptoms, rather than by simple similarity of major symptoms in the manner of his predecessors. In fact, it was precisely because of the demonstrated inadequacy of such methods that Kraepelin developed his new diagnostic system. | |||
| <table align="left"><tr><td>]</tr></td></table> | <table align="left"><tr><td>]</tr></td></table> | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| Drawing on his long term research, and using the criteria of course, outcome and prognosis, he developed the concept of ], which he defined as the "sub-acute development of a peculiar simple condition of mental weakness occurring at a youthful age." When he first introduced this concept as a diagnostic entity in the fourth German edition of his ''Lehrbuch der Psychiatrie'' in 1893, it was placed among the degenerative disorders alongside, but separate from, ] and ]. At that time the concept corresponded by and large with ]'s ]. In the sixth edition of the ''Lehrbuch'' in 1899 all three of these clinical types are treated as different expressions of one disease, dementia praecox. | Drawing on his long term research, and using the criteria of course, outcome and prognosis, he developed the concept of ], which he defined as the "sub-acute development of a peculiar simple condition of mental weakness occurring at a youthful age." When he first introduced this concept as a diagnostic entity in the fourth German edition of his ''Lehrbuch der Psychiatrie'' in 1893, it was placed among the degenerative disorders alongside, but separate from, ] and ]. At that time the concept corresponded by and large with ]'s ]. In the sixth edition of the ''Lehrbuch'' in 1899 all three of these clinical types are treated as different expressions of one disease, dementia praecox. | ||
| Kraepelin postulated that there is a specific brain or other biological pathology underlying each of the major psychiatric disorders. Just as his laboratory discovered the pathologic basis of what is now known as ], Kraepelin was confident that it would someday be possible to identify the pathologic basis of each of the major psychiatric disorders. |
Kraepelin postulated that there is a specific brain or other biological pathology underlying each of the major psychiatric disorders. Just as his laboratory discovered the pathologic basis of what is now known as ], Kraepelin was confident that it would someday be possible to identify the pathologic basis of each of the major psychiatric disorders. | ||
| One of the cardinal principles of his method was the |
One of the cardinal principles of his method was the recognition that any given symptom may appear in virtually any one of these disorders; i.e. there is virtually no single symptom occurring in dementia praecox (the name was later changed to "schizophrenia" by Eugen Bleuler), which cannot sometimes be found in manic-depression. What distinguishes each disease symptomatically (as opposed to the underlying pathology) is not any particular (pathognomonic) symptom or symptoms, but a specific pattern of symptoms. In the absence of a direct physiological or genetic test or marker for each disease, it is only possible to distinguish them by their specific pattern of symptoms. Thus, Kraepelin's system is a method for pattern recognition, not grouping by common symptoms. | ||
| Kraepelin also |
Kraepelin also demonstrated specific patterns in the genetics of these disorders and specific and characteristic patterns in their course and outcome. Generally speaking, there tend to be more schizophrenics among the relatives of schizophrenic patients than in the general population, while manic-depression is more frequent in the relatives of manic-depressives. | ||
| He also reported a pattern to the course and outcome of these conditions. Kraepelin believed that |
He also reported a pattern to the course and outcome of these conditions. Kraepelin believed that schizophrenia had a deteriorating course in which mental function continuously (although perhaps erratically) declines, while manic-depressive patients experienced a course of illness which was intermittent, where patients were relatively symptom-free during the intervals which separate acute episodes. This led Kraepelin to name what we now know as ], ''dementia praecox'' (the ] part signifing the irreversible mental decline). It later became clear that ''dementia praecox'' did not necessarily lead to mental decline and so was renamed by ] to correct the misnomer. | ||
| Kraepelin is credited with the classification of what was previously considered to be a unitary concept of ], into two distinct forms: | Kraepelin is credited with the classification of what was previously considered to be a unitary concept of ], into two distinct forms: | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| Kraepelin was also a colleague of ], and co-discoverer with Alzheimer of ]. | Kraepelin was also a colleague of ], and co-discoverer with Alzheimer of ]. | ||
| In addition to his distinction between dementia praecox and manic-depression, Kraepelin should be credited with being the founder of modern scientific psychiatry, psychopharmacology and psychiatric genetics, according to the eminent psychologist ] in his ''Encyclopedia of Psychology.'' Kraepelin postulated that psychiatric diseases are principally caused by biological and genetic disorders. His psychiatric theories dominated the field of psychiatry at the beginning of the twentieth century |
In addition to his distinction between dementia praecox and manic-depression, Kraepelin should be credited with being the founder of modern scientific psychiatry, psychopharmacology and psychiatric genetics, according to the eminent psychologist ] in his ''Encyclopedia of Psychology.'' Kraepelin postulated that psychiatric diseases are principally caused by biological and genetic disorders. His psychiatric theories dominated the field of psychiatry at the beginning of the twentieth century. He vigorously opposed the approach of ] who regarded and treated psychiatric disorders as caused by psychological factors. | ||
| Kraepelin's contribution was largely ignored throughout much of the twentieth century |
Kraepelin's contribution was largely ignored throughout much of the twentieth century, with the success of Freudian etiological theories. Kraepelin's basic concepts however now dominate psychiatric research and academic psychiatry, and today the published literature in the field of psychiatry is overwhelmingly biological and genetic in its orientation. Kraepelin's great contribution in discovering schizophrenia and manic-depression remains relatively unknown to the general public and his work is little read. This is despite the recent widespread adoption of his fundamental theories on the etiology and diagnosis of psychiatric disorders, which form the basis of all major diagnostic systems in use today, especially the ]'s ] and the ]'s ] system. | ||
| For a more complete description of the epic social and political battle that gave rise to ] (from an anti-Freudian perspective), see psychiatrist ]'s "The Freudian Fraud". | For a more complete description of the epic social and political battle that gave rise to ] (from an anti-Freudian perspective), see psychiatrist ]'s "The Freudian Fraud". | ||
Revision as of 12:57, 3 September 2006
Emil Kraepelin (February 15 1856–October 7 1926) was a German psychiatrist who attempted to create a synthesis of the hundreds of mental disorders classified by the 19th century, grouping diseases together based on classification of common patterns of symptoms, rather than by simple similarity of major symptoms in the manner of his predecessors. In fact, it was precisely because of the demonstrated inadequacy of such methods that Kraepelin developed his new diagnostic system.
 |
In 1886, after only eight years of training, he was appointed to a professorship at the University of Tartu (then Dorpat) in what is today Estonia and became the director of an eighty-bed University Clinic. There he was able to study and record many clinical histories in detail and "was led to consider the importance of the course of the illness with regard to the classification of mental disorders." Ten years later he announced that he had found a new way of looking at mental illness. He referred to the traditional view as "symptomatic" and to his view as "clinical".
Drawing on his long term research, and using the criteria of course, outcome and prognosis, he developed the concept of dementia praecox, which he defined as the "sub-acute development of a peculiar simple condition of mental weakness occurring at a youthful age." When he first introduced this concept as a diagnostic entity in the fourth German edition of his Lehrbuch der Psychiatrie in 1893, it was placed among the degenerative disorders alongside, but separate from, catatonia and dementia paranoides. At that time the concept corresponded by and large with Ewald Hecker's hebephrenia. In the sixth edition of the Lehrbuch in 1899 all three of these clinical types are treated as different expressions of one disease, dementia praecox.
Kraepelin postulated that there is a specific brain or other biological pathology underlying each of the major psychiatric disorders. Just as his laboratory discovered the pathologic basis of what is now known as Alzheimer's disease, Kraepelin was confident that it would someday be possible to identify the pathologic basis of each of the major psychiatric disorders.
One of the cardinal principles of his method was the recognition that any given symptom may appear in virtually any one of these disorders; i.e. there is virtually no single symptom occurring in dementia praecox (the name was later changed to "schizophrenia" by Eugen Bleuler), which cannot sometimes be found in manic-depression. What distinguishes each disease symptomatically (as opposed to the underlying pathology) is not any particular (pathognomonic) symptom or symptoms, but a specific pattern of symptoms. In the absence of a direct physiological or genetic test or marker for each disease, it is only possible to distinguish them by their specific pattern of symptoms. Thus, Kraepelin's system is a method for pattern recognition, not grouping by common symptoms.
Kraepelin also demonstrated specific patterns in the genetics of these disorders and specific and characteristic patterns in their course and outcome. Generally speaking, there tend to be more schizophrenics among the relatives of schizophrenic patients than in the general population, while manic-depression is more frequent in the relatives of manic-depressives.
He also reported a pattern to the course and outcome of these conditions. Kraepelin believed that schizophrenia had a deteriorating course in which mental function continuously (although perhaps erratically) declines, while manic-depressive patients experienced a course of illness which was intermittent, where patients were relatively symptom-free during the intervals which separate acute episodes. This led Kraepelin to name what we now know as schizophrenia, dementia praecox (the dementia part signifing the irreversible mental decline). It later became clear that dementia praecox did not necessarily lead to mental decline and so was renamed by Eugene Bleuler to correct the misnomer.
Kraepelin is credited with the classification of what was previously considered to be a unitary concept of psychosis, into two distinct forms:
- Manic Depression (now seen as comprising a range of mood disorders such as Major Depression and Bipolar Disorder), and
- Dementia praecox, which was later renamed schizophrenia by Eugene Bleuler.
Kraepelin was also a colleague of Alois Alzheimer, and co-discoverer with Alzheimer of Alzheimer's disease.
In addition to his distinction between dementia praecox and manic-depression, Kraepelin should be credited with being the founder of modern scientific psychiatry, psychopharmacology and psychiatric genetics, according to the eminent psychologist H. J. Eysenck in his Encyclopedia of Psychology. Kraepelin postulated that psychiatric diseases are principally caused by biological and genetic disorders. His psychiatric theories dominated the field of psychiatry at the beginning of the twentieth century. He vigorously opposed the approach of Freud who regarded and treated psychiatric disorders as caused by psychological factors.
Kraepelin's contribution was largely ignored throughout much of the twentieth century, with the success of Freudian etiological theories. Kraepelin's basic concepts however now dominate psychiatric research and academic psychiatry, and today the published literature in the field of psychiatry is overwhelmingly biological and genetic in its orientation. Kraepelin's great contribution in discovering schizophrenia and manic-depression remains relatively unknown to the general public and his work is little read. This is despite the recent widespread adoption of his fundamental theories on the etiology and diagnosis of psychiatric disorders, which form the basis of all major diagnostic systems in use today, especially the American Psychiatric Association's DSM-IV and the World Health Organization's ICD system.
For a more complete description of the epic social and political battle that gave rise to Freudianism (from an anti-Freudian perspective), see psychiatrist E. Fuller Torrey's "The Freudian Fraud".
External links
- Extensive bibliography of English translations of Kraepelin's works
- Extensive bibliography of works by and about Kraepelin's including those in the original German
See
for biographies of Kraepelin.
Categories: