Misplaced Pages

User talk:Sachamcd: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:14, 6 September 2016 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,221 edits Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion: You are risking a block← Previous edit Revision as of 13:45, 6 September 2016 edit undoSachamcd (talk | contribs)73 edits Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussionNext edit →
Line 68: Line 68:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. <b style="color: darkblue;">&#124; <i>]</i> &#124;</b> (]) 04:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. <b style="color: darkblue;">&#124; <i>]</i> &#124;</b> (]) 04:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
:Sachamcd, you are risking a block per . You are trying to undo the result of a formal ], in other words you are warring against consensus. There may still be time for you to concede the point if you want to avoid a block. Thank you, ] (]) 05:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC) :Sachamcd, you are risking a block per . You are trying to undo the result of a formal ], in other words you are warring against consensus. There may still be time for you to concede the point if you want to avoid a block. Thank you, ] (]) 05:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


I am removing material that in MAY 2016 was deemed completely irrelevant to the breadth of his political career and comments which were already disproven in the Canadian Jewish media. <ref>http://www.cjnews.com/news/canada/councillor-apologizes-to-jewish-community-but-not-chabad</ref>
] has a history of editing jewish propaganda into a host of pages on wikipedia, look at his edit history and this will be evident. I suspect he might be operating under the Jewish Internet Defence force and it is he who should be banned for perpetuating his bias and obvious agenda. I am reenlisting the help of admin ] who back in May 2016 helped reverse some edits made by ]. ] is trying to ban me because he knows this is the only way for him to get his libel to stick. Please help. ] (]) 13:45, 6 September 2016 (UTC)Sachamcd

Revision as of 13:45, 6 September 2016


Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremy Searle (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Misplaced Pages:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

I need an explanation as to why, major news wesbsites in Montreal are not eligible sources. Also why his colleagues (Marvin Rotrand, Lionel Perez, Russell Copeman) can be considered notable enough, but he cannot, even though he has been in politics for longer then those mentioned above. Sachamcd (talk) 15:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Sacmcd

SwisterTwister talk 21:10, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremy Searle (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Misplaced Pages:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. LaMona (talk) 16:21, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Gale P. Elston for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gale P. Elston is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Gale P. Elston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella    23:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Bejnar, however I have already familiarized myself with the notability page. Gale P. Elston is extremely well-known in the international art scene. Her clients include very notable and famous artists like Willem De Kooning and Andy Warhol, not “C-list celebrities” as Velella put it. Please consider the legitimacy of this article in context of the international art world. Sachamcd (talk) 17:53, 19 December 2015 (UTC)Sachamcd

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremy Searle (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CatcherStorm was: This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Misplaced Pages requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Misplaced Pages:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Misplaced Pages at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. CatcherStorm 12:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)


Teahouse logo Hello! Sachamcd, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CatcherStorm 12:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jeremy Searle  with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~ 06:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Edit War re:Jeremy Searle page

I am in the process of making an edit warring report in regards to the Jeremy Searle page which you have removed the "Jewish Guilt Comments" section from even after the RfC on talk page reached a consensus to include.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. | MK17b | (talk) 04:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Sachamcd, you are risking a block per this complaint. You are trying to undo the result of a formal WP:Request for comment, in other words you are warring against consensus. There may still be time for you to concede the point if you want to avoid a block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


I am removing material that in MAY 2016 was deemed completely irrelevant to the breadth of his political career and comments which were already disproven in the Canadian Jewish media. MK17b has a history of editing jewish propaganda into a host of pages on wikipedia, look at his edit history and this will be evident. I suspect he might be operating under the Jewish Internet Defence force and it is he who should be banned for perpetuating his bias and obvious agenda. I am reenlisting the help of admin Oshwah who back in May 2016 helped reverse some edits made by MK17b. MK17b is trying to ban me because he knows this is the only way for him to get his libel to stick. Please help. Sachamcd (talk) 13:45, 6 September 2016 (UTC)Sachamcd

  1. http://www.cjnews.com/news/canada/councillor-apologizes-to-jewish-community-but-not-chabad