Revision as of 03:30, 5 September 2006 editJFD (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,235 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:41, 5 September 2006 edit undoJFD (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,235 edits archived Indrancroos' personal attacksNext edit → | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
:::Once again freedom skies, it is almost as though we are not communicating... you have cited private websites that support your views... i and JFD have cited better private websites that support our views... you can't cite private websites... you keep on talking about the one shaolin website that you cite as the "true" shaolin website! when there are about 300 out there that claim to be the true one! not only that, we have cited books that support our views.... however, it is difficult to have a balanced article when you keep on removing our references and only allow one sentence in the article that support a different view on indian martial arts and its connection to the rest of asian martial arts... further, some of those newspaper articles that you quoted and websites that you quoted actually support our views... ] 01:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | :::Once again freedom skies, it is almost as though we are not communicating... you have cited private websites that support your views... i and JFD have cited better private websites that support our views... you can't cite private websites... you keep on talking about the one shaolin website that you cite as the "true" shaolin website! when there are about 300 out there that claim to be the true one! not only that, we have cited books that support our views.... however, it is difficult to have a balanced article when you keep on removing our references and only allow one sentence in the article that support a different view on indian martial arts and its connection to the rest of asian martial arts... further, some of those newspaper articles that you quoted and websites that you quoted actually support our views... ] 01:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
==Kenneth Tennyson's racist campaign against South Asians== | |||
USER INDRANCROOS was told that writing in big black bold letters alleging that someone is a racist might be considered uncivil by many and against wikipedia policy. ] 00:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | USER INDRANCROOS was told that writing in big black bold letters alleging that someone is a racist might be considered uncivil by many and against wikipedia policy. ] 00:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
''no evidence in any indian religious text of anything that approximates martial arts... the greeks actually had documents, statues, historical evidence of greco-roman wrestling maneuvers and styles that you can correlate with current greco-roman wrestling.'' | |||
That is one of the most ignorant guesstamations I have ever come across. Did not the Greeks have religious texts of their own describing their warfare? The Illiad written by Homer is comparable to the Ramayana. Apart from Mallayuda, the Tamil historical text such as the ''Silappadikaram'' and the ''Purananuru (Four Hundred Songs of War and Wisdom)'' mention of the Dravidian martial arts. As far as statues are concerned, there are literally hundreds of thousands of them found throughout South Asia of warriors showing different fighting techniques. I have read many of your postings on other martial arts Forums including a book review on Amazon.com. Apart from martial arts, I have read other topics where you have posted or edited parts of items on wikipedia with anything to do with India or South Asia. On one topic regarding ] achievements you have deleted Congressman Bobby Jindal off the site and added another person from Korea and have stated that ''"bobby jindal is not the most attractive person to have on the asian american page"''. In one of the Martial arts Forums online you stated that ''"The Indians have a lot to owe to the Greeks in Martial arts"''. Did you just come up with this idea after watching the movie ''Alexander'' the Hollywood Blockbuster? Also, when talking about the origins of martial arts in India you have just mentioned on this page that it may have originated from Turkey. We have been talking about Greek, Chinese, and Indian combat styles. Did it ever occur to anyone that Africa has their own martial arts and that the Dravidian martial arts may have originated from there? In another statement you stated that Alex Doss being a '''Tamil''' and Joyce Gracie being a '''Brazilian''' do not have the authority to speak on Chinese and Japanese martial arts. So, does this apply to you too? After all, you are not Chinese, Japanese, or even Asian either... Aren't you contradicting yourself when you make rash comments like that? So you may have a Phd., but in what? The fact that the Dravidians of India having a lot of African traits probably ticks you off, especially when they tend to achieve in any field. Also, as far a peers opposing ] views, it is basically and only from two people namely you and JFD, not the whole world. It seems to me that you have something against those from South Asia and South Asian culture in general. More over people of color... | |||
<br>] 23:47, 1 September 2006 | |||
''Also, as far a peers opposing ] views, it is basically and only from two people namely you and JFD, not the whole world.'' | ''Also, as far a peers opposing ] views, it is basically and only from two people namely you and JFD, not the whole world.'' | ||
Line 106: | Line 100: | ||
''Hey, if you are not the person who wrote that crazy letter up there then i do apologize... regardless, i warned the user on being more civil... oh, and i have no interest in finding out where you live... ] 00:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)'' | ''Hey, if you are not the person who wrote that crazy letter up there then i do apologize... regardless, i warned the user on being more civil... oh, and i have no interest in finding out where you live... ] 00:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)'' | ||
Are you threatening people now who speak out against your insensitive actions? For time memorial, you have been preaching about proper postings on wikipedia, INSTEAD OF PUTTING POVS on it. You must practice what you preach instead of getting drunk and simply going to a wikipedia site and removing someone from there just because your "POV" is that Bobby Jindal does not have an attractive face. The bottom line is that you are against people of South Asian decent. ] 03:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::if i remember correctly, i didn't remove his picture... i merely moved it down to the politician section that he was part of... the statement that he was not attractive was merely meant at his picture... i did not make any blanket statement on race.] 01:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
You must make up your mind whether you did so or not. First you admitted that you removed his picture. Now you are saying that you didn't. I hope you are not under the influence of alcohol. It's just not professional when posting or editing things in wikipedia.] 03:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::''- first of all, the removal of bobby jindal occured late at night after a few beers and really, you must agree that bobby jindal really is not the most attractive person in the world'' | |||
:::''- if i remember correctly, i didn't remove his picture...'' | |||
(cur) (last) 01:21, 24 March 2006 Kennethtennyson (Talk | contribs) (bobby jindal is not the most attractive person to have on the asian american page) | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Asian_American&offset=20060406035027&action=history | |||
FYI: The Asian American page did not consist of a Politics section back then. It is only recent when the Politics and Sports section were added. | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Asian_American&diff=prev&oldid=45194085 | |||
] 03:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
==ok, had enough== | ==ok, had enough== | ||
Line 237: | Line 210: | ||
] 18:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | ] 18:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
I guess to Kenny, we all look alike.] 19:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
Well, for quite some time now, I have been quitely reading these posts from Kenneth Tennyson and JFD. They have been bashing other authors, editors, writers, and even stocking them via the internet. At one point, Kenneth finally admitted that he was drunk when he edited one of the articles on wikipedia. How do we know he is not drunk now. He has been preaching about clarity, and now he has proven that he has not been practicing what he preaches. He also thinks that whatever he says is the supreme truth just because he supposedly holds a Phd. He has claimed in this page and in other websites that in order for someone to write a book, post an article, etc. on topics, they need to hold a Phd. Anyone can simply post that hey have a Phd. online. So far, he has not proven online that he has one by stating what he has his Phd. in, what school he got it from, and what his profession is and in which state. ] 20:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Kenneth Tennyson's reckless behavior in other forums== | |||
'''As far as Kenneth Tennyson bashing other authors, here is an exerpt from a book review on Amazon.com:''' | |||
:::''Founder of the homemade Mushindo Karate movement, never studied under a legitimate teacher, or any martial art teacher, never set foot in Asia, completely disproven, shown to have plagiarized many photos and other materials from other published written sources. Of course he claims to have studied under masters in Tibet, and been a disciple of Okinawan Karate teachers - since disproven by such worthy sources as Gorge Mattson, et al. Was involved in an abusive sex scandal with several female students a few years back ("Sleep with me and I'll enlighten you" kinda thing), uses abusive and coercive tactics to control what ex-students say at him, a propaganda liemaster.'' | |||
The person he is bashing is none other than Terrence Dukes (or the real Frank Dukes from the movie ''Bloodsport'') | |||
'''While putting others down, Kenny brags, or advertises about his martial arts expertise to scare people:''' | |||
:::''Hmmm... well, kalaripayattu has a lot of similarities with caopera, alot of jumping and posturing, and a lot of religious themes to it. I guess it depends on what martial arts you've trained in to determine whether I can kick A$$ or not. let's see... I'm a red belt second degree in tae kwon do and have some knowledge in shotoken. I've got to start learning about grappling though.'' | |||
'''Freedom skies and myself are not the only ones who feel that Kenny is a racist. Here are some excerpts from users from other forums:''' | |||
(The Armchair Analyst - Asia Times Forum) | |||
:::''I see. However, you sounded like a racist.'' | |||
:::''No, I have no "South Asian sensitivities". I am no nationalist/jingoist. I consider myself above it all.'' | |||
:::''ALL your posts are based on the rather silly assumption that militaristic power in the last three centuries is a sign of "greatness". It may be in a narrow Anglo-saxon way, but not in a Gandhi-Buddha sort of a way. Get it?'' | |||
:::''Civilizations such as India (actually even China until today) have NEVER had a negative impact on other civilizations that remotely matches yours.'' | |||
:::''You have generalized Indians to be bigots etc., I agree that SOME not all are. But the fact that you generalized it to include an entire ethnic group as "obnoxious", by definition makes you a racist. YES IT DOES!'' | |||
(rocky - Asia Times Forum) | |||
:::''What inaccuracy are you referring to? If Brits came to India and got rich, was the wealth Indian or British? Besides looting, what exactly did British accomplish? While your bias is clearly visible with this statement, what is your purpose of posting this in this forum?'' | |||
:::''Isnt it quiet evident that even in yr 2005, it is difficult for you to get off your pompus ass, why on earth would anything written by Anglo-Saxon when Europeans were busy colonizing the world accurate? Isnt there a vested interest on part of the European to disparage Native Cultures and delibrately belittle their achievements?'' | |||
That's just a couple of the many others. However, I do not want to clog up this page. | |||
'''I have also noticed that Kenny tends to have a habit of cutting and pasting articles, and also cloning the article he had fabricated on a few web sites | |||
'''I know that I am not the only one who knows this:''' | |||
(Brahman - Martial Arts Planet Forum) | |||
:::''i really do hate to post on this topic seems as it was only to counter mine, which by the way it would be nice if you would simply post this on my topic were you could get a real discusion, were as here people might simply ignore you becuase of the topic cloning.'' | |||
(Bliss - Asia Times Forum) | |||
:::''Thats not from a 'social studies journal' you fraud, thats a copy paste...'' | |||
(rocky - Asia Times Forum) | |||
:::''I believe Kenneth probably picked up a web-site of some Tourist Board, most likely Kerala, and made a religion out of some possible over exaggeration.'' | |||
:::''But wait, it is the same guys who create more categories just to be the highest or tallest or biggest in that.'' | |||
'''Kenneth Tennyson brews hate in martial arts forums:''' | |||
(Kennethtennyson - Asia Times Forum) | |||
:::''Alas, this thread has degenerated into a hate fest not suprisingly enough in the South Asian section of AToL. Regardless, I want to posit something to all of the bigoted South Asians out there who think that they are the masters of the world, greater than any East Asian or white european...'' | |||
:::''First, without a shadow of the doubt the latter 3 centuries have been moved by White Europeans. Europeans and americans until the 1950's were the movers and shakers of the world.'' | |||
:::''However, What is the one, the only one, non-European country in the whole world that has been modernized for the last 2 centuries? '' | |||
:::''-Japan, in East Asia'' | |||
:::''What are the only non-European countries in the whole world that was a colonial power, obtaining land during the colonial period?'' | |||
:::''-Japan in Manchuria, China in Central Asia'' | |||
:::''What are the current non-European countries that have reached first world status and Technology?'' | |||
:::''-Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, all in East asia'' | |||
:::''What are the two U.S. wars to result in a military defeat or a tie for the U.S.?'' | |||
:::''-Vietnam War and Korean War - East Asia'' | |||
:::''What is the only non-European country to have played a major role in WWI and WWII militarily?'' | |||
:::''- Japan, in East Asia'' | |||
:::''What are the three largest economies in the world today?'' | |||
:::''- U.S., China, Japan'' | |||
:::''Name one South Asian country to have ever won a military war against a European power?'' | |||
:::''- Hmmm........ India's independence against Britain does not count. Britain ruled India with the same amount of military personnel that it the French to administer all of Vietnam. Britain was broke after the war, and Gandhi was lucky he did not get himself killed for preaching non-violent protests (although I do admire him for it). If Gandhi had gone to Vietnam to preach his non-violent approach to freeing the country against the French, he would have been laughed out of Vietnam or possibly killed by the French.'' | |||
:::''Name one instance in the recent 1000 years of India's history in which it has won a military engagement against a foreign power?'' | |||
:::''-Hmmm.........'' | |||
:::''Name one instance in the last century, where a European or American military engagement did not result in complete annihilation of a Middle Eastern or South Asian power?'' | |||
:::''-Hmmm........'' | |||
:::''Name one country to have defeated 6-7 other countries in a span of a few days?'' | |||
:::''-Isreal against its Neighboring Middle Eastern countries'' | |||
:::''What are the shortest wars that the U.S. has ever fought with the least amount of casualties involving a majority of the U.S. military?'' | |||
:::''- Persian gulf war, Recent Iraq war, Recent Afghani war'' | |||
:::''Look, I want to state that I am not bigoted. It's just that I'm getting tired of reading racist posts by obnoxious people from South Asia who think that they are the masters of the world.'' | |||
(Isn't that true that racists say that they are not racists?) | |||
(Reply form Asterix - Asia Times Forum) | |||
:::''OK lets accept you are not a bigot for a moment there.'' | |||
:::''Now lets see who is a bigot here out of the two:'' | |||
:::''1) A Non-South Asian who butts into a South Asian forum and starts showing why South Asians are inferior to East-Asians and Europeans!'' | |||
:::''2) A South Asian who is discussing issues about South Asia in a South Asian board.'' | |||
:::''The person in (1) suits the profile of a Bigot more than the person in (2) above, I would say. What do you think, Kenneth?'' | |||
:::''Regards,'' | |||
:::''Asterix.'' | |||
'''Kenny then appologizes for the offensive post above due to a few too many drinks... err... 3 cases actually:''' | |||
:::''Alas, if I could have taken back that previous long post on military history, I would have. My bad - now that I look at it, it does seem sort of vindictive and acrimonious. It just goes to show you that drinking 3 cases of Guinness and typing on forums does not go well together.'' | |||
'''Kenny's hate brewing encourage others to do the same:''' | |||
(agent Orange - Asia Times Forum) | |||
:::''Only difference being that he wouldn't have the shamelessness to claim another country's achievements as his own. Now that China has gained more confidence in the world, its people find it less of a need to brag about the past. For me, I don't really care who invented what. All I know is that any Shaolin cook or janitor can beat the crap out of any Indian guru.'' | |||
(Butterfly Palm - Fighting Arts Forums) | |||
:::''I suppose the Indians will next claim that silk was discovered by a 2000BC Indian princess who happened to be singing and dancing round a mulberry tree one day (as they still do now in Indian movies?) and why not, given that the majority of Indian women in India to-day still wear silk sarees as an everyday wear.'' | |||
:::''Since humans or pre-humans needed to fight right from the stone-age period and the present state of archaeological knowledge suggests that the earliest humans were found in Africa, then we can say, guite confidently, that kung fu or MA in general must have been practiced first in darkest Africa and then maybe spread to India or that perhaps the early dark-skinned Africans tracked their way to the Indian subcontinent (bringing their primitive MA with them) and eventually evolved into the present day dark-skinned south Indians.'' | |||
:::''This should make a good topic for a PhD. dissertation.'' | |||
(Butterfly Palm - Fighting Arts Forums) | |||
:::'' Asking someone to accept that one's jealously guarded family art actually originated in a small thatched-roof, dung-strewn village populated by a people speaking an unheard of language 1000s of miles away and 100s of years ago is very very difficult to stomache.'' ] 23:37, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
Kenneth Tennyson does not have the authority to dictate to others what is right or wrong given the fact that he had admitted twice that he was under the influence of alcohol when editing material on wikipedia or posting offensive material on other sites. He also lacks professionalism when he makes heavy personal attacks against other authors, scholars, and the general public on various other sites. Apart from his alcohol abuse and abuse of others, Kenneth Tennyson has so far not shown us what he has his Phd. in (for all we know, he might not even have a Phd. at all), what school he has graduated from. So far, there is no visible proof that Kenneth Tennyson holds a Phd. Also, out of all the scholars and authors, he has not quoted from a single South Asian for a balanced, non-biased proof. Even though wikipedia is pretty much a free for all site, he should not be wasting his time in the Indian Martial Arts section of Misplaced Pages. But, then, who am I to dictate on who or who should not be able to post anything? | |||
... Oh yeah, and by the way Kenny, my posting about you does not go against wikipedia regulations as what you may call "vandalism". I am speaking out against those with such bevioral problems and pose direct or indirect threats to others in wikipedia. Who do you think you are about telling Freedom skies not to worry about you finding out where he lives? I am taking that as a threat to not only him, but to other users as well. Do that again, an I will surely report you to the Misplaced Pages department on your behavior. Regards. ] 23:37, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
==look== | ==look== |
Revision as of 03:41, 5 September 2006
Martial arts Unassessed | |||||||
|
List of archived discussions |
---|
I accept the challenge of displaying institutions which support my POV that Bodhidharma contributed to the establishment of shaolin in order to confirm that multiple sources, from institutions and authors around the world, do cite the same thing.
Not good enough, never was and still is not.
If it's not peer-reviewed, it just doesn't cut it.
The resulting poverty and the lack of patronage resulted n the fall of the Ksatriyas, the martial artists.
SO CITE A SOURCE FOR IT. Can you seriously not find a scholarly citation about the decline of patronage under the British Raj?
JFD 20:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
The set of sources including :-
- OFFICIAL websites from martial arts institution
- OFFICIAL websites from institutions involved in propogating martial arts in actual learning, with dojos and everything
- New York Times and the BBC
- Authors from throughout the world, scores of them, including traditional and contemporary ones
- The official Shaolin website
- Martial arts organisers, teachers and practitioners
Will be used, that ought to be good enough for anybody and does cut it. Apart of the three old guys and the three books you mentioned, I doubt that you have any other sources to demonstrate the extent of your train of thought.
SO CITE A SOURCE FOR IT. Can you seriously not find a scholarly citation about the decline of patronage under the British Raj?
I already did, the importance of the patronage is described in the Alters book to which i provided a link, I also provided links to the articles in which the british killed Kshatriyas themselves and removed the Royal Kings, thereby removing the royal patronage, if you want a comprehensive list of Kshatriyas invaded and deposed by the british, and the Royal kings replaced by the crown, I can move swiftly enough to give you more internal links of the invading british doing just that, killing Kshatriyas, deposng local Royals. Lemme know.Freedom skies 07:54, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Once again freedom skies, it is almost as though we are not communicating... you have cited private websites that support your views... i and JFD have cited better private websites that support our views... you can't cite private websites... you keep on talking about the one shaolin website that you cite as the "true" shaolin website! when there are about 300 out there that claim to be the true one! not only that, we have cited books that support our views.... however, it is difficult to have a balanced article when you keep on removing our references and only allow one sentence in the article that support a different view on indian martial arts and its connection to the rest of asian martial arts... further, some of those newspaper articles that you quoted and websites that you quoted actually support our views... Kennethtennyson 01:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
USER INDRANCROOS was told that writing in big black bold letters alleging that someone is a racist might be considered uncivil by many and against wikipedia policy. Kennethtennyson 00:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Also, as far a peers opposing Freedom skies views, it is basically and only from two people namely you and JFD, not the whole world.
- I already knew that kenny was crazy, though. I always knew that crazy Kenny and the guy he awarded a barnstar to now, for things he did months ago were the only opposition against the New York Times, BBC, Martial arts community, pioneers, authors.....you get it.
- They've been trying to hold me off by doing every routine, play on words, falshback, y'know.
- Anyways, interactions with JFD have often been productive, and he asks legitimate questions, and has accomadated me in the past for which I'm appreciative.
- Kenny though, plain scares me, I won't let a guy like that near me even after all the boxing and everything, for obvious reasons of psychopathphobia. Freedom skies 07:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
I also provided links to the articles in which the british killed Kshatriyas themselves and removed the Royal Kings, thereby removing the royal patronage,
The links you provided were to Misplaced Pages articles—and Misplaced Pages cannot cite itself as a source. Moreover, those articles were entirely unreferenced.
What the article needs from you is this:
- Indian royalty provided patronage to many endeavors, not just pehlwani.
- Somewhere out there, someone must have written an academic paper, or a chapter, or it might even just be a sentence or paragraph in another work, where he or she says, "The institution of royal patronage in India declined as a result of the British Raj."
- Because, judging from the Alter, between the royal patrons he lists and the story of Gama, it sounds like royal patronage was alive and well.
Look, I've already given you a scholarly source that pins the decline of IMA, or at least kalarippayattu, on the introduction of firearms and how the introduction of Western military and police practices disrupted the livelihoods of the martial castes.
If you don't wish to use it, that's fine. You seem determined to attribute the decline of IMA to British disruption of royal patronage, but you have to cite a source for it. And other Misplaced Pages articles—especially those who don't cite sources themselves—will not do.
JFD 12:08, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
It is one thing to use the sources you cite to demonstrate the popularity of the Bodhidharma legend.
Quite another to demonstrate its historicity.
Do not confuse the two.
For example, it doesn't matter how widespread the story of tea growing from Bodhidharma's severed eyelids gets, that's never going to make it history.
It's one thing when a martial artist presents the Bodhidharma legend as a story that was passed down to him, and quite another when specialists in history ask the question, "Did Bodhidharma create the martial arts?" and proceed to research the question in depth.
All of the sources I cite have researched the question in depth.
You have yet to present a single source that does so.
To present the Bodhidharma legend as incontrovertible historical fact on the basis of its popularity is intellectually dishonest.
If you want to say that Bodhidharma is a popular figure in the folklore of East Asia and the martial arts, that's one thing.
If you want to say that the Bodhidharma legend is historical fact, cite a scholarly source for it.
But don't try to say the story is true because it's popular. That's fallacious reasoning and you know it.
JFD 12:10, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Freedom skies, you should really watch out for what you put in big black bold letters about other people. Write another title like that and it's called vandalism... anyways, you're taking what i wrote out of context... first of all, the removal of bobby jindal occured late at night after a few beers and really, you must agree that bobby jindal really is not the most attractive person in the world. look at the guy's face! second, i did not state that i believe that the indian martial arts came from the middle east... nor have i ever written or edited a wikipedia article to that effect. what i did state was that the sources YOU quoted stated that the indian martial arts came from the middle east and yet you are not willing to put that on the last page. If you did your homework, and looked at the history of greek wrestling, the greek statues, pictures, sculptures and greek writing describes activities similar to greco-roman wrestling... pankration or something like that was what the greeks called it. as far as I can tell, you are the one who is prejudiced from your statements about the british destroying all martial arts in india and so forth along with you stating that you don't believe someone's scholarship is worthy because they are white. Anyways, either indran cross is the same person as freedom skie OR indran cross is the same person as bakasuprman. Kennethtennyson 01:12, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Indran croos and Freedom skies are two different people.Bakaman Bakatalk 01:14, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Neither. If you have reasons to suspect we are the same person go to WP:RFCU and place your rats there.Bakaman Bakatalk 01:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks.Kennethtennyson 01:27, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Notifying a two day leave
Should'nt even take two days, just a jump in and jump out trip of sorts. Will answer as soon as I come back. Freedom skies 11:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, if you are not the person who wrote that crazy letter up there then i do apologize... regardless, i warned the user on being more civil... oh, and i have no interest in finding out where you live... Kennethtennyson 00:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Hey, if you are not the person who wrote that crazy letter up there then i do apologize... regardless, i warned the user on being more civil... oh, and i have no interest in finding out where you live... Kennethtennyson 00:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
ok, had enough
ok indran croos, i've sort of had enough of this... you need to look at what you are quoting... i was quoting off memory but i went to the page and now you can also... go to march 26 2006 01:21:24 where i made my statement while i was slightly inebriated... LOOK AT THE PAGE!... his picture is still there.... there is an in politics section but now that I look at it and remember... i didn't move it to the in politics section... i moved it to the definition section where the word... INDIAN SUBCONTINENT was placed... so scroll your eyes to the left... that is where his picture is next to the the word INDIAN SUBCONTINENT to match the picture...and i moved michelle wie's picture to the top... who i think is hotter than bobby jindal... and i think you would agree she is hotter than bobby jindal. now end this discussion and accusation. Kennethtennyson 15:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
- Would it settle this argument to everyone's satisfaction if I moved a picture of Padma Lakshmi to the top of the Asian American page?
- JFD 15:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
- this has nothing to do with the page... it has to do with me and with indran croos being childish... i suggest we leave the page alone... it currently has a nice smattering of different asian americans... filipino, indian, chinese...Kennethtennyson 15:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
more scholars to add
we should add paul elliot and j.a.g. roberts and meir shahar to the list of specialists in martial arts history, ie. historians who do not believe in this theory or even in the existence of any portion of the bodhidharma legend. j.a.g. roberts discounts the fact that bodhidharma even contributed to zen. Kennethtennyson 16:05, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello everyone
I've been asked to have a look at this discussion. While I agree that generally the martial arts are a tendentious subject (go figure), we don't have to be so when reporting them. It is possible to report legendary stories as stories (whether polemic, didactic, nationalist, etc.) without asserting they are true. Our article on Zhang Sanfeng can serve as one example.
I would like all the editors to acquaint themselves with WP:AGF, WP:Civility and especially WP:NPA. This means using words like "crazy", unfounded accusations of threats and direct threats towards other editors are out. I will from now warn editors who do so, and then apply blocks where necessary if the warnings don't work. We have to decide if we are scholars or gang members. --Fire Star 火星 17:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi Firestar, and replies
Surprising, JFD.
Now you're bringing arguments that you know are wrong to the table to get me caught in doing what was never disputed in the first place, surprising and now I've begun to realize how the barnstar changes an academic. You're just attempting to cover up for kenny, to try and legitimize his so-called-arguments.
You said "I prefer to let Zarrilli, Pillai, and Barbosa speak for themselves.
The earliest recorded evidence of Kalaripayyattu date from Portuguese descriptions during the latter 16th-17th centuries and becoming less prominent after the British outlawed it during the 18th and 19th centuries CE. It has recently been reinvigorated in the last few decades due to the general worldwide interest in martial arts." to Kenny on 06:55, 15 June 2006.""
You freaking knew that (and I quote) "the British outlawed it during the 18th and 19th centuries CE", and yet you questioned the legitimacy of "The Decline of martial practices" portion.
Wow, guess when you tick one of the barnyard couple, the other goes after you all the way, huh ???
Anyways, and the importance of Royal patronage to Pehlwani is described in the Alter's citation, Royal patronage which went as the british controlled India and replaced the local kings by the crown (what exactly are you asking me to cite here ?? that the british never killed Kshatriya kings ?? or did'nt replace the local rulers with the crown ?? Yes they did and with the replacing of local rulers went the patronage that they gave to many arts, martial or otherwise.). Microscopic riyasats like Datia and Gwalior collaborated with the british as they were too weak to actually fight them, their local traditions survived.
Because, judging from the Alter, between the royal patrons he lists and the story of Gama, it sounds like royal patronage was alive and well.
The sentiment in that time was every victory Gama had was a victory against the british, see the citation.
As for Datia, the british did'nt wipe out but collaborated with it, these states were not conquered but treaties signed and revenues collected, cultures remaining almost intact. Similar examples are Gwalior etc., The india that was conqured by the British, maratha, sikh empires, there rulers were replaced by the crown, which could not care less for providing any patronage to local arts.
- Joeseph alter's citation, on how important the patronages are was provided by me.
- Do I seriously have to provide a citation for "the british replacing local rule with the crown" and "the british conquest" ?? Do you not believe that the British took over India ??? for 200 years. If you want to have a look for yourself so badly just go to these sites. I have come to expect hollow arguments and tactics of delay but arguing that the british never conquered India by force is just too obvious of a delay tactic.
Add 2+2, importance of patronage and the removal of it. Now, if you want books, run the same keywords thorugh Google book search or JSTOR.
You said "I prefer to let Zarrilli, Pillai, and Barbosa speak for themselves.
The earliest recorded evidence of Kalaripayyattu date from Portuguese descriptions during the latter 16th-17th centuries and becoming less prominent after the British outlawed it during the 18th and 19th centuries CE. It has recently been reinvigorated in the last few decades due to the general worldwide interest in martial arts." to Kenny on 06:55, 15 June 2006.""
Had you quoted that message in full it would have read:
I prefer to let Zarrilli, Pillai, and Barbosa speak for themselves.
— JFD, 06:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
The earliest recorded evidence of Kalaripayyattu date from Portuguese descriptions during the latter 16th-17th centuries and becoming less prominent after the British outlawed it during the 18th and 19th centuries CE. It has recently been reinvigorated in the last few decades due to the general worldwide interest in martial arts.
Referring to Portuguese descriptions becomes redundant with the specific citation of Barbosa. As for the rest, I've never encountered claims of a ban under the Raj. Can we get a cite on that?
The normal text is me. That second sentence in italics is code from the Kalarippayattu article pasted on to Kennethtennyson's Talk Page so that I could ask him to provide sources for the statement that there was a ban under the Raj.
And notice, I asked Kennethtennyson for sources just like I ask you for sources.
what exactly are you asking me to cite here ??
This:
with the replacing of local rulers went the patronage that they gave to many arts, martial or otherwise.
That is exactly what I want you to cite.
Add 2+2, importance of patronage and the removal of it.
"Adding 2+2" is original research.
The rajas of Aundh and Miraj were not the only royal patrons of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The Maharaja of Baroda, raja of Kohalpur, a number of the rajas of Indor, and the rajas of Patiala, Jodhpur, and Datiya were all strong supporters of wrestling as a way of life.
— Joseph S. Alter, The Wrestler's Body: Identity and Ideology in North India, pp. 75–76
And, as I pointed out before, according to Alter, the institution of royal patronage was alive and well during the British Raj.
if you want books, run the same keywords thorugh Google book search or JSTOR.
If you want to add this material to the article, that's your job.
Wow, guess when you tick one of the barnyard couple, the other goes after you all the way, huh ???
Shiva's Trident and Bakaman have been quiet lately. Did something happen to them?
JFD 20:03, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
The set of sources including :-
- OFFICIAL websites from martial arts institution
- OFFICIAL websites from institutions involved in propogating martial arts in actual learning, with dojos and everything
- New York Times and the BBC
- Authors from throughout the world, scores of them, including traditional and contemporary ones
- The official Shaolin website
- Martial arts organisers, teachers and practitioners
I won't narrow my sources down ONE bit, because the thought of Bodhidharma contributing to the cause of martial arts is that widespread. Of course, that's in case of a challenge, in which case this asking me to narrow my sources down will be a moot point.
Freedom skies, you should really watch out for what you put in big black bold letters about other people.
Look who's talking.
anyways, you're taking what i wrote out of context
Look who's talking again.
first of all, the removal of bobby jindal occured late at night after a few beers and really, you must agree that bobby jindal really is not the most attractive person in the world. look at the guy's face! second
Wow !! and you were surprised that I was disgusted by your past actions ??? ??
i did not state that i believe that the indian martial arts came from the middle east... nor have i ever written or edited a wikipedia article to that effect. what i did state was that the sources YOU quoted stated that the indian martial arts came from the middle east and yet you are not willing to put that on the last page
Let's chart a route for all these arts.
We'll compile a list of arts.
Then chart from alpha to omega, since you seem to be ready to endorse the content of these sites.
Lemme Know.
If you did your homework, and looked at the history of greek wrestling, the greek statues, pictures, sculptures and greek writing describes activities similar to greco-roman wrestling... pankration or something like that was what the greeks called it.
Gawd !! did you just equate pankration with Greco ???
WTF ??
Pankration and Greco ??
God, I know both of them in detail, I kinda contributed to the articles on Pancrase and greco here and that's personal attack removed
you are the one who is prejudiced from your statements about the british destroying all martial arts in india and so forth along
I never said that, the sense is that systemtic takeovers of the Kshatriyas , the outlawing of martial arts, the killing of Kshatriyas in battlefield contributed to the overall decline of IMAs. You just take what I have to say grossly out of context personal attack removed
you don't believe someone's scholarship is worthy because they are white
Kenny more "white people" both in the US and the UK are willing to go the distance even before I ask them, I have more tried and tested "white" friends than peole who've heard of you.
Plus please point me to where I said that Kenny. I'm curious.
Anyways, either indran cross is the same person as freedom skie OR indran cross is the same person as bakasuprman
He's not me. Nobody's me but me.
Freedom skies 18:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
look
you are not discussing anything that is of any merit... you have accused me of racism - where have i made a racist comment? you have taken discussions out of other discussion groups out of context and further have accused me of being other people on other discussion groups that i have no idea about... as far as i can tell, you are having problem swallowing the fact that I disagree with your POV view of the world and you have nothing to add to the discussion.. you have not brought anything to the table to this discussion except accusations... and your viewpoint is quite POV on the world... you have also accused me of being drunk on two occasions - what are the two occasions? and did anyone disagree with my edits on wikipedia? No! as far as i can tell, the edits that you and freedom cross have made to articles have led to two to three locked articles...Kennethtennyson 03:08, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
blocked - looks like bakasuprman, indrancroos, and shiva's trident were blocked. Kennethtennyson 03:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Category: