Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:47, 5 September 2006

• See archive 1
• See archive 2
• See archive 3
• See archive 4
• See archive 5
• See archive 6
• See archive 7
• See archive 8
• See archive 9

Thanks!

Dear Dahn! Thanks for your clear and objective comments on the History of Romania>"Wlachia or Romania" dispute. Ethnicity was surely not a political category before the modern era. To confuse statehood and ethic territory is a very common mistake amoung Central-East Europen history interpretations. This is due to many flustrating factors and a shame on modern history education within the region. Thanks again --Kukorelli 15:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

care e mai bun la matematica

sal Dahn, itzi zic cu simpatie, nu pierde timp si energie cu ironii fine cu mine, ca ma gadili. fiecare are calitatzi si defecte, stie unele si altele nu, nu itzi imagina ca ejti mai dejtept ca mine ca amandoi suntem prosti si dejtepti in aceeasi masura. sau de fapt nu, io snt parca un pic mai dejtept ca tine, cel putzin asha am io impresia Criztu 21:02, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

What about this?

Spuneai ca nu 'intelegi' aromana, what about graiul banatean? Il intelegi? Vezi Graiul banatean Apostolos Margaritis 09:46, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Jews in Romania

I've responded to you at User talk:Jmabel#Recent edit History of the Jews in Romania. - Jmabel | Talk 22:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Bogdan I

Mai baiatule nu stiu cate clase ai insa de ce te incapaţânezi sa postezi niste porcarii pe pagina dedicata lui Bogdan I? Ce bibliografie ai folosit la realizarea articolului? Folosesti ca bibliografie niste inventii personale care nu au legatura cu realitatea!!! Ma mir ca nu ai sters si poza cu Bogdan I pusa de mine si sa o inlocuiesti cu a ta. Vezi art facut de mine despre Bogdan I.

• Citeste de pe link-ul de mai jos si vezi si ca am extras un citat edificator di articol:

"Dragos a fost trimis de Ludovic de Anjou, regele Ungariei, pentru a fixa organizarea Regatului Ungariei in acest teritoriu din care tatarii fusesera alungati. Bogdan actioneaza in sensul contrar al regalitatii ungare: fiind supus unei presiuni foarte mari in teritoriile sale din Maramures, a gasit solutia de a-si pastra aceasta distanta fata de Regalitate venind in Moldova" - Ovidiu Cristea, cercetator la Institutul de Istorie "Nicolae Iorga" din Bucuresti

Translation

Can you help me with this: http://www.edrc.ro/recensamant.jsp?regiune_id=1407&judet_id=1579&localitate_id=1638 This Svinita municipality in Romania have Serb majority according to the census, but seems that these Serbs are not Orthodox. What is English name for their religion listed there: "Creştină de rit vechi"? PANONIAN (talk) 13:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

"Old-Rite Christians" or "Old Believers". bogdan 13:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok, thank you for translation. I did not know that there are Serbs who follow this religion, but I guess man learn something every day. :) Regarding map of South Slavs in Romania, I checked detailed ethnic map of Romania that I have, and according to that map, these 6 municipalities are only municipalities of Romania where South Slavs form majority. Bulgarians that live in Dobruja, Bucharest, or in Transylvania do not form majority in any municipality. So, the title of the map "South Slavic ethnic groups in Romania" is quite correct because there is no other municipality of Romania with South Slavic majority. If you really want, I can change title to "South Slavs in the Romanian Banat" or "in Southwestern Romania", but I do not think that this is necessary because current title is correct too. PANONIAN (talk) 21:08, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok now? http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:South_slavs_romania.png PANONIAN (talk) 21:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

romanian

Thnaks for the help. Hmains 23:41, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

I did not understand something. Here is my goal: to get people articles removed from the 'Greek diaspora' category--none of the other Diaspora categories have people articles directly in them. If I cannot put them in a 'Greek F00' category, then I put them in 'People of Greek descent' cegegory, which is in the 'Greek diaspora' category. When I noticed you had left these articles in 'Greek Romanian' category, then I just deleted the 'Greek disapora' category since 'Greek Romanian' category is in the 'People of Greek descent' category, which is in the 'Greek diaspora' category. To not delete, leaves them in 'double category level' status: the articles are both in a category and its parent or grandparent category. Sometimes left that way, but I understand WP does not prefer double level cats Your further thoughts. Thanks Hmains 00:05, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Can I put them in the 'people of Greek descent' category instead of directly in the 'Greek diaspora' category' as I mentioned above. Also, I don't understand the meaning of 'entries'. Sorry. Thanks Hmains 00:11, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

P.S., I do not mean to discourage any discussion. I am just putting forth my thoughts and questions on the subject. Thanks. Hmains 00:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

You are the expert here, not me. Greek Romanian plus 'something else' categories are fine. I just want to argue that the 'something else' category be 'People of Greek descent' rather than 'Greek diaspora'. 'People of Greek descent' is in category 'Greek diaspora' so the articles would still be in the Diaspora category. This would make the Greek Diaspora category match the pattern of the other diaspora categories: in each case, the people are placed in the associated 'People of xxx descent' category. Thanks Hmains 02:32, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

I am sorry. This is all beyond me. I just try to organize, and copyedit, and help WP in small ways. I am not a reseacher. Whatever you want to do is fine with me. Thanks Hmains 04:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

I just noticed something. Please look at Category:Ethnic German groups of Romania. Might a similar 'Ethnic Greek groups of Romania' help? Thanks Hmains 18:51, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Again

Hi again! I currently work on articles related to Serbs that live (or lived) in neighbouring countries, although, I finished article Serbs of Romania, and before I start working on Serbs of Hungary, I want to write two more articles related to Serbs of Romania - Banatska Klisura and Pomorišje. In fact, those are two historical geographical regions inhabited by Serbs similar to for example Mezőség (Hungarian region) or Burzenland (German region). Problem is that I do not know are there Romanian names for "Banatska Klisura" and "Pomorišje", because, if there are Romanian names for them, it would be stupid to write these articles with Serbian names. I also do not know does Romanians have any distinction for these two regions at all, or such distinction exist only among Serbs. "Banatska Klisura" is small region that correspond with the territory of Socol and Pojejena communes of Caras-Severin county, and "Pomorišje" means "a land around river Mures" (but only land that is now in Arad county, not around whole river). So, are there Romanian names for these two regions, or I should start their articles with Serbian names? PANONIAN (talk) 02:51, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Nat. Theatre

Responded on my talk page. - Jmabel | Talk 07:00, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Bulgarians in Romania

Hi! In a comment to PANONIAN's talk you mentioned Bulgarian communities in Romania distinct from those of the Banat Bulgarians. I know almost nothing about these communities, but I'm very curious, do you have any additional and detailed information? The only thing I could find is a very short description of dialects from around Bucharest () and a listing of some villages where Bulgarian was still spoken by the elderly people in the 1960s, of which I could identify Brăneşti, Ilfov, Dudeşti, Bucharest, Popeşti-Leordeni and Cioplea. Todor→Bozhinov 11:42, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I also thought they were already assimilated. As for Sighetu Marmaţiei, I just don't know why they're giving this as an example (I mean, 0.55% of 20% of 44,185, right?) So the guys from around Bucharest were part of largely the same wave as the Bessarabian Bulgarians, but decided to stay in these parts. I know about the exchange in Northern Dobruja and didn't expect any remaining communities there either. Thanks for the info (Bogdan too)! Todor→Bozhinov 12:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Clisura Dunării

Yes, seems that this is right name, but we have problem with its size: Check this map: http://www.zamolxis.ro/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=98 Seems that it include little larger area, and that it include communes of Socol, Pojejena, Moldova Noua, Coronini, Sichevita, and Berzcasca and perhaps even a Svinita. Are those its correct borders or not? PANONIAN (talk) 14:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Coins

Thanks for finding that material in ro:. I've translated it in Romanian leu. Please have a look, because you are far more truly bilingual than I. - Jmabel | Talk 18:02, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Dragomans

Hi there,

I noticed you're a native Romanian speaker. Would you be so nice as to make a stub titled ro:Dragoman? I've been categorising the articles about dragomans in Romanian, there are quite a few of them, but there is no article about dragomans. Should the category be titled ro:Categorie:Dragoman, as it is now, or should it be in plural? Best regards, Benne _(talk) 19:33, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I've changed the category to ro:Categorie:Dragomani. --Benne _(talk) 20:47, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Hadn't thought of that yet. I'll try and find something as soon as I have time. There are a few Romanian-language articles that I could not yet figure out as well (for example, there is an article John Mavrocordatos, but I don't know whether it's the same as ro:Ioan Mavrocordat).

I figured I'd just put everything in a list, hoping that others would contribute to it. As you can see, all different Wikipedias come up with different dragomans. By adding them all together in a list, the missing articles in the various Wikipedias become clear. --Benne _(talk) 21:02, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Transylvania

I have the Transylvania article watchlisted, and so have quite some Hungarian editors, so don't worry, Criztu isn't going to get away with what he's doing. In fact, I think he's someone who cannot "grow up" (maybe, IRL, he hasn't?) - he's willing to comply with rules as long as they don't prevent him from reaching what he wants, but if they do, he'll resort to more and more open trolling (maybe even outright vandalism, who knows). Still, be careful about WP:3RR - I know it doesn't apply to vandalism, but you never know what some admins might think about Criztu's edits. KissL 19:43, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

I would say that Criztu is not vandalizing, just editing against consensus. - Jmabel | Talk 23:43, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

History of Bucharest

I think this makes the references less daunting. If you disagree, feel free to revert. - Jmabel | Talk 23:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Rather than keep bouncing, I'll respond on my user talk page. - Jmabel | Talk 00:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Clisura Dunării

Hi, I just finished this Clisura Dunării article. Please check did I wrote there its correct borders, and is that a correct list of municipalities in Clisura. PANONIAN (talk) 16:19, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

The sections of the Military Frontier did not had ethnic, but only administrative purpose. Banatian Military Frontier was divided into 3 sections: German, Illyr and Vlach, see: http://terkepek.adatbank.transindex.ro/kepek/netre/184.gif The fact that these sections had names German, Illyr, Vlach, etc was not ethnic designation because for example, the "German" section was mainly populated by Serbs, as you can see here: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/92/Austria_hungary_1911.jpg So, I would remove sentence that it was "divided along ethnic lines". Also, term "Illyr" in this case was a designation for Serbs, because no other South Slavs lived in the region. The term "Illyr" was sometimes a designation for all South Slavs and sometimes for Serbs only. Same like the term "Vlach", which sometimes was a designation for group of the Vlach peoples and sometimes only for Romanians. In this case, terms "Illyr" and "Vlach" do not designate group of peoples, but only Serbs and Romanians. And in English, "klisura" might be gulch, canyon, bay, ravine, or flume according to my vocabulary. :) PANONIAN (talk) 16:54, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

I just expanded a little article about Illyrians, thus it now have explanation for the usage of the term in the Habsburg Monarchy: http://en.wikipedia.org/Illyrians#Later_usage_of_the_term Regarding whether we should move article to "Danube Gorge", you can do it if you want, but we should know first that this name is used in English, because we should not to invent new names here in Misplaced Pages. :) If the English name for some geographical area does not exist, then local non-English name could be used. If you found some English source that mention region under name "Danube Gorge", then by all means you can change name. PANONIAN (talk) 21:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

A reminder

No troll feedin' please. :) Don't give him the attention that he wants! If things get bad you could try asking Ronline to semi-protect the noticeboard. I already requested Transylvania on WP:RPP. If you get mad just get up from you computer for a while and relax. Once you feel that you're better again you can come back. However, avoid talking to him. —Khoikhoi 16:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

u should listen to coyote, he knows what he's speaking. he made it dozen of times now...--203.106.52.102 17:09, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

When he deletes your request just re-add it, and go looking for admins that are online right now to protect it. That's what I'll do now. —Khoikhoi 17:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Don't tell me you're so smart....pls talk with me...--203.106.52.102 17:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Romainian historical regions

Do you share the same views on Template:Romanian historical regions and Template:Ukrainian historical regions, or selective? i.e. "the inclusion into historical regions should be done only on the basis of current territorial ownership? If so, could you please correct the first template. Thanks, KPbIC 21:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Annuaire & le reste

Salut! pas de problème tout va bien! Apparemment le fait d'avoir laissé un message a dissuadé l'autre éditeur d'ergoter à l'infini ("ergoter" signifiant ne pas arreter de négocier et de s'engueuler pour des détails, comme les coqs!). Sinon, il y a un annuaire du Ministère des Affaires étrangères ici, je sais pas si c'est ce que tu cherchais. A + Tazmaniacs 13:50, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Wojciech Bobowski: copyright problem

Hi there,

There is a copyright problem with the section about Ufki's Psalter. It is almost identical with a paragraph in the booklet accompanying the Sacred Bridges CD. Do you know where you got the information from? --Benne _(talk) 17:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry for assuming you added it ... I'll look into it some other time, but deleted the whole section for now. I ordered a Turkish book about the man and his Psalter, will try and add some info later. Thanks anyway. Best regards, Benne _(talk) 18:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I see now. I got you mixed up with someone else. Sorry for that. :-) --Benne _(talk) 18:32, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Paşalîc

alleging that

the three month Ottoman occupation under Teodosie "seemed to be the first step in the creation of a Wallachian Pashaluk "

is very similar with alleging that

the five month personal union of Transylvania, Wallachia and Moldova under Mihai Viteazul seemed to be the first step in the creation of the national unitary state of Romania

Please, try to reflect about this.

--Vintila Barbu 08:53, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Islam in Romania

In the discussion about the German version I have the same problem. Somebody fight for the phrase that there is and never was any evidence or even any sign of trace of Muslim presence in Wallachia and Moldavia. His main argument are those capitulations, too, how can I counter it? --Roksanna 16:58, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Stephen the Great

As far as I know there was a treaty beteen Stephen and the Ottoman Empire, and the agreement stipulate that no mosc should be ever build in the nord of the Danube. Still this can be a urban legend due to the fact i have no reference. The fact is that in Romania there was no mosc at the north of the Danube(by my knowledge) till 1989.CristianChirita

Maybe this is true, maybe it is a legend, how can we find out? by the way, I think the no-mosque-policy abolished step by step already after the formal laws of 1879, when also Muslim got full civil rights (formally). --Roksanna 20:04, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

http://www.arhiepiscopiasucevei.ro/carti%20editate/FONDUL%20BISERICESC%20AL%20BUCOVINEI%20SI%20LICHIDAREA%20LUI.pdf#search=%22tratat%20romano%20otoman%20moschei%22 Abvoe is one document that say that no mosc or islamic prozelitism was allowed in Moldavia, but no reference is given.CristianChirita

But even this ruler of Moldavia did... --Roksanna 21:08, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Also Mihnea Turcitul; still no mosc or prozelitism; They converted from political reasons, and were exceptions.CristianChirita

North of Danube a "miniature" mosc was buid in Bucharest around 1923 simbolizing the frienship with the turks, it was placed in Parcul Carol CristianChirita

At least I found a text by Karl Marx who mentioned those capitulations. --Roksanna 09:27, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Friendship? Because of the anti-bulgarian alliance 10 years before? Where Parcul Carol is situated? --Roksanna 16:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

you know, Tineretului metro station, Arenele Romane, Monumentul Eroului Necunoscut... here's a pic. bogdan 20:14, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

I wish you would have a license free pic that I could include in the article. And can you find out what was the reasond for that suddenly re-discovered "friendship" in 1923. It was the 10years alliance or not? --Roksanna 22:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Great, I found this foto, at least you can see a small bit of that mosque... --Roksanna 22:50, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

But this whole problem becomes very interesting more and more in a strange way. I never heard about such a strong realized prohibition. Even in Constantinople a muslim community around their own mosque was established long before the Turks made Byzanz a vassall or conquered - already in the 8th century although the Byzantines were still heavily fighting with the Arab Muslims who sieged the capital. So it seems to be almost unbelievable that a weak principaute could control those anti-muslim settlemens really that strictly. Where, for example, those converted princes did pray (at least Friday they had to go the mosque even if they only want to pretend successfully being a muslim)? --Roksanna 16:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Every mulsim when he walk ouside the holy land can pray in a private way. It was common sense, we don't build churches at Mecca where is no orthodox community,so why to build mosc in a contry where is no muslim. Regarding the policy, Constantin Brâncoveanu has watching his four sons beheaded by the ottomans knowing that the salvation was to convert them to islam. One explanation is that the people in that time were educated only by the othodox church, and in the belief of the ortodox church to go to other religion is sin punished for eternity. Probablly the rule assured the ottomans that no popular revolt will occure. Because from economical point of view durring the ottomans compring with Autria or Russia the life of common people was easier. Making this compromise the ottomans used the grains and horses from Romania whithout having a grat army of occupation. Also the Romania (Moldova and Romanian coutry) was a heaven am means of controll for greeks from Fanar.

By the way, does anybody here know the year of birth and death of Mihnea Turcitul, not only time of reign? --Roksanna 23:58, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Romare comments

Ce faci dom'le? Tu ai scris pe Misplaced Pages despre generalitatiile partidului Romania Mare? Tie ti se pare ca aceste lucrui care au fost scrise, sunt adevarate? Daca da vino te rog si cu argumente care sa sustina credibilitatea tuturor acestor afirmatii cu privire la imaginea PRM? Daca nu (sa speram ca motorasele constiintei inca mai functioneaza) te rog lasa-i pe altii care cunosc problemele mai bine si nu fac afirmatii eronate.

Dahn, with reference to the comment immediately above, I agree with YOU. One only has to have a look at a few issues of Romania Mare and Tricolorul to see that the party remains ant-Semitic, anti-Magyar, anti-Roma, homophobic, etc. Nothing erroneous in your prudent judgement in reverting edits that bordered on vandalism. Snoopdog1 13:18, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Moses, Gaster

Hi Dahn! Thank you for your attention, I edited what you asked me, please check and tell me if this is satisfied. Multumesc mult! By the way, I'm user:NorbertArthur. Regards, Mortzy 26 August 2006

Crisana

Please see this: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Crişana Do you know more about Partium and Crisana? The Crisana article claim that it is same area as Partium, but Crisana belonged to Eyalet of Tmesvar, not to Transylvania during Ottoman rule, thus how it can be considered a Partium then? PANONIAN (talk) 21:57, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok, see what is the problem: if, as Crisana article claims, "Crişana roughly corresponds to the historical region Partium", then why map of Crisana shown here do not correspond with the map of Partium shown here here ? Ok, they correspond partially, but their territories are rather different than similar. PANONIAN (talk) 22:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Pahlen

I think this was Count Fyodor (or Fedor) Petrovich Pahlen (Федор Петрович Пален) (02.09.1780 - 08.01.1863), son of Petr Alekseevich Pahlen. According to http://www.genealogia.ee/genealogy-diplomat.htm (I can translate if needed) Пален фон дер, Федор Петрович (Митава 02.09.1780 — Петербург 08.01.1863) — барон, граф (1798 г.), действительный тайный советник, член Государственного Совета, Новороссийский генерал-губернатор. Посвятил себя дипломатической карьере. При Российских посольствах в Стокгольме, Париже и Лондоне граф Пален подготовил себя к дипломатической работе. Затем был посланником в Вашингтоне (1809 — 1811 гг.), в Рио-де-Жанейро (1811-1815 гг.) и в Мюнхене (1815 — 1822 гг.). Сын графа Петра Андреевича Палена. I believe Moldavia and Wallachia were parts of the Novorossia Gubernia there the guy was the governor. abakharev 00:49, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• I have put a short article about this guy - Fyodor Petrovich Pahlen. Any additional info is welcome abakharev 08:50, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Another language question

Could you please see my latest question at Talk:Taraful Haiducilor? Thanks in advance. - Jmabel | Talk 19:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Antonescu

New answer, FYI--Talk:Ion Antonescu#User_reverts. --Gutza 21:26, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Mircea Eliade

It looks like your version is the current one; I'll watchlist it. - Jmabel | Talk 20:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Bombing of Bucharest in World War II

Bună. Ştiu c-aveţi multe pe cap, dar vroiam să vă spun despre un articol la care se lucrează. See also here. Currently to do: create Bombing of Romania in World War II, with suitable re-wording and shifting around of content. Also, material from here on the 24-5 August bombing should be included, plus more background, as indicated in the talk page link.

I'm certainly not expecting you to do anything, but if you feel so inclined, please do, because I know you write well and diligently. Biruitorul 06:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Mediation request

You must state your case here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Mircea_Eliade

--Peter IBM 19:46, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Listen, kid. I have no reason to "state" a particular version or argue my case in front of someone who has engegd in deleting and manipulating the text of this article. You will carry that mediation alone, if at all, since any user vaguely familiar with WP rules will tell you not only that you are wrong, but that you ought to be banned (your quick familiarity with WP rules despite your Johnny-come-lately-ism also lead me to suspect that you are somebody's sockpuppet; given your record with uploding images that have been created by others as your own, doing it for pages of cities in Romania, I suspect that you are User:NorbertArthur, a close friend of user:Bonaparte). Your "mediation" request is a pathetic attempt at diversion, and I turn my back on all its sophistry. I also do not appreciate that you have come to this article after stalking me for having pointed out to you thst you were breaking several copyright legislations.

In other words, I will not engage in a dialogue with a vandal. I urge all people to simply revert your disgraceful edits. Dahn 19:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Reply

Back already? ;-) I'm pretty sure he's Bonaparte, it'll be taken care of soon... —Khoikhoi 20:46, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem! —Khoikhoi 21:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Contributions&target=Moldoveanul ? Who is he? I suspect it's you. --Peter IBM 21:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Still pulling that Vadim-like idiotic tactic, Bonaparte? Dahn 21:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Take a walk !

Mai, m-am uitat asa la ce ai scris pe wiki...

Tu sa stii ca nu esti în toate mintile: stai 12 ore si mai mult la calculator, scrii tot ce-ti trece prin minte, esti inconsecvent, arogant si arbitrar.

De fapt, ce te intereseaza pe tine, este numai sa-ti impui punctul de vedere, indiferent daca are vreo noima sau nu. Cu cât îti impui un POV mai absurd, cu atât îti dovedesti tie insuti ca ai mai multa putere pe wiki, nu-i asa ?

Probabil ca resimti placere si mândrie la gândul ca invocând orice argumente si înnecându-ti preopinentii în suvoaie nesfârsite de cuvinte, îti impui pâna la urma POV.

... iar daca nu-ti reuseste, încerci cu intrigi, aliante, jocuri de culise

..si toate astea pentru ce ?

Mai baiete, tu pari a fi pierdut contactul cu realitatea. Tu chiar nu realizezi cât de derizorie este toata aceasta activitate de pe wiki, în care investesti atât de mult timp si nervi ?!

Ca orice junkie, îti inchipui ca poti controla situatia. N-o mai controlezi de mult...

Sarmane, sa nu-ti închipui ca sunt vreunul din adversarii tai ocazionali ori cronici, de-aici de pe wiki, care vrea acum sa se razbune aruncându-ti în fata acuzatii nedrepte si insulte. Nu bietule, sunt total din afara. Mi-a atras atentia excelenta ta engleza si ti-am urmarit contributiile, probabil cu speranta nemarturisita ca voi da peste un remarcabil tânar român..

Când colo, te dovedesti doar un baiat care sta prea mult în casa, la limita psihopatiei - sau poate esti deja psihopat ?!

Mai iesi mai baiete la aer, gaseste-ti o prietena, fa ceva concret în viata reala, scrie ceva adevarat. Nu-ti mai cheltui neuronii cu eforturi sterile si jocuri josnice.

Retine deci: acestea au fost opiniile cuiva din afara, neimplicat în joculetele voastre debile. Te-am ales pe tine, pentru ca ai totusi un potential, majoritate contributorilor de pe aici nefiind decât niste tristi veleitari mediocri.

Trezeste-te baiete cât mai e timp si intra în viata reala !

Cosma din San Francisco