| Revision as of 04:56, 22 September 2016 editTalgoKL (talk | contribs)31 edits →Kachwaha← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:41, 22 September 2016 edit undoSitush (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers260,192 edits →Kachwaha: you misunderstandNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| *I refer you again to ]. Now stop removing that information, please. - ] (]) 11:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC) | *I refer you again to ]. Now stop removing that information, please. - ] (]) 11:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :*And . You don't get to force your version into the article against consensus. The prior version had been there for a while. The notice above re: sanctions is going to kick in if you are not careful. - ] (]) 10:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| The same thing applies to you also. You can also not force your version without consensus. -] (]) 04:56, 22 September 2016 (UTC) | ::*The same thing applies to you also. You can also not force your version without consensus. -] (]) 04:56, 22 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :::*No, you misunderstand. The version before your changes has been there for ages and, which is more, has been accepted by past discussions. That means it '''is''' the consensus, pending any revision through further discussion. - ] (]) 07:41, 22 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:41, 22 September 2016
TalgoKL, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi TalgoKL! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC) |
Kachwaha
The issues raised by your edits have been discussed exhaustively in the past. You were bold in trying yet again to go against what reliable sources say and, per WP:BRD, it is you who now needs to find a way to gain consensus for your changes. - Sitush (talk) 09:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Please discuss this issue at talk page of the article. TalgoKL (talk)
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 - Sitush (talk) 11:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- I refer you again to WP:BRD. Now stop removing that information, please. - Sitush (talk) 11:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- And again. You don't get to force your version into the article against consensus. The prior version had been there for a while. The notice above re: sanctions is going to kick in if you are not careful. - Sitush (talk) 10:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- The same thing applies to you also. You can also not force your version without consensus. -TalgoKL (talk) 04:56, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- No, you misunderstand. The version before your changes has been there for ages and, which is more, has been accepted by past discussions. That means it is the consensus, pending any revision through further discussion. - Sitush (talk) 07:41, 22 September 2016 (UTC)