| Revision as of 02:44, 15 October 2016 editChampion (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,547 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:13, 15 October 2016 edit undoరవిచంద్ర (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users3,408 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ::], If it is difficult to comprehend, do you think we should mark it as not a neutral point of view? Neutral point of view indicates that the article is not biased and does not use any eulogizing or Wiesel words. Tell me which part of it is difficult to comprehend.--] (]) 02:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | ::], If it is difficult to comprehend, do you think we should mark it as not a neutral point of view? Neutral point of view indicates that the article is not biased and does not use any eulogizing or Wiesel words. Tell me which part of it is difficult to comprehend.--] (]) 02:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :::I say the whole section, I'll fix the tags. - ] ('']'') ('']'') <small>(Formerly '''TheChampionMan1234''')</small> 02:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | :::I say the whole section, I'll fix the tags. - ] ('']'') ('']'') <small>(Formerly '''TheChampionMan1234''')</small> 02:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ::::I can't understand why this simple story is difficult to understand. Sorry but I can't agree with you. --] (]) 03:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:13, 15 October 2016
User:Champion, you have added the tag to this film that it is a fans point of view and not a neutral point of view, can you let me know which part of the article looks like that?--Ravichandra (talk) 02:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I believe that the plot section is difficult to comprehend. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- User:Champion, If it is difficult to comprehend, do you think we should mark it as not a neutral point of view? Neutral point of view indicates that the article is not biased and does not use any eulogizing or Wiesel words. Tell me which part of it is difficult to comprehend.--Ravichandra (talk) 02:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I say the whole section, I'll fix the tags. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I can't understand why this simple story is difficult to understand. Sorry but I can't agree with you. --Ravichandra (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I say the whole section, I'll fix the tags. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- User:Champion, If it is difficult to comprehend, do you think we should mark it as not a neutral point of view? Neutral point of view indicates that the article is not biased and does not use any eulogizing or Wiesel words. Tell me which part of it is difficult to comprehend.--Ravichandra (talk) 02:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)