Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/2016 Jerusalem shooting attack: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:18, 19 October 2016 editNableezy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers56,155 edits 2016 Jerusalem shooting attack← Previous edit Revision as of 07:27, 19 October 2016 edit undoXyzspaniel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,720 edits 2016 Jerusalem shooting attackNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:
*'''Keep''' as per ], I have expanded the article with sources and events that have taken place since the shooting. (I have not yet added the excellent sources brought by User:Shrike above). More remains to be added on details of the attack; political context, but article clearly passes ]. '''Note''' also that it is routine practice to add terror attacks when they occur.] (]) 23:46, 18 October 2016 (UTC) *'''Keep''' as per ], I have expanded the article with sources and events that have taken place since the shooting. (I have not yet added the excellent sources brought by User:Shrike above). More remains to be added on details of the attack; political context, but article clearly passes ]. '''Note''' also that it is routine practice to add terror attacks when they occur.] (]) 23:46, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
::It is your routine. And please note, ] is a Misplaced Pages policy. ] is a guideline. A violation of WP:NOT cannot be addressed by an assertion that it satisfies a guideline. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 03:18, 19 October 2016 (UTC)</small> ::It is your routine. And please note, ] is a Misplaced Pages policy. ] is a guideline. A violation of WP:NOT cannot be addressed by an assertion that it satisfies a guideline. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 03:18, 19 October 2016 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' Now has plenty of reliable sources and coverage ]] 07:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:27, 19 October 2016

2016 Jerusalem shooting attack

2016 Jerusalem shooting attack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. There's been an unfortunate habit of creating an article for every news event involving violence, at least every event involving violence against Israelis, in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This should be merged to List of violent incidents in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, July–December 2016 unless some sustained coverage, which requires time, can be shown Nableezy 23:29, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. Nableezy 23:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Nableezy 23:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
What sort of reason is that? Zero 00:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
The reason(ing) is this: Since the administrator who closes this discussion is almost certain to ignore all rules (and not in a WP:IAR sort of way, because that policy requires as a condition the improvement of Misplaced Pages) and close it as keep based on a nose-count, it doesn't matter that I cite policy that says this alleged article is a Wiki-abomination. I might as well vote with the majority. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 02:23, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
According to this logic we should delete half of the articles about events in Misplaced Pages.Many articles rely solely on contemporary news articles of those events.I don't mind the mind the cleanup but it should be uniform. Till that this article should stay--Shrike (talk) 07:48, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Umm no. If you dont get the logic feel free to ask, but try not to misrepresent it. K thnx. nableezy - 14:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
This was meant for Malik.I fixed the indent--Shrike (talk) 14:58, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. North America 08:07, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. North America 08:07, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America 08:07, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
It is your routine. And please note, WP:NOT is a Misplaced Pages policy. WP:GNG is a guideline. A violation of WP:NOT cannot be addressed by an assertion that it satisfies a guideline. nableezy - 03:18, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Categories: