Revision as of 16:16, 24 October 2016 view sourceIsambard Kingdom (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,730 edits Undid revision 745977380 by 66.114.154.18 (talk) Please read the article before making an edit like this.← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:13, 25 October 2016 view source Korvex (talk | contribs)396 editsm →Origins: Edited some grammar, and inserted various other extra sources and updated information (regarding 1 kings 6:1 interpretation, and other sources regarding exodus dating)Tag: Visual editNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
], 1829]] | ], 1829]] | ||
'''The Exodus''' (from ] ἔξοδος ''exodos'', "going out") is the ], or ], ] of ]; its message is that the ] were delivered from slavery by ] and therefore belong to him through the ].{{sfn|Sparks|2010|p=73}}<ref group="Notes" name="Charter myth">"Charter (i.e., foundation) myths tell the story of a society's origins, and, in doing so, provide the ideological foundations for the culture and its institutions." (</ref> It tells of the enslavement of the Israelites in ] following the death of ], their departure under the leadership of ], the revelations at ] (including ]), and their wanderings in the wilderness up to the borders of ].{{sfn|Redmount|2001|p=59}} The exodus story is told in the books of ], ], ] and ], and their overall intent was to demonstrate God's actions in history, to recall Israel's bondage and salvation, and to demonstrate the fulfillment of Israel's covenant. {{sfn|Redmount|1998|p=63}} | '''The Exodus''' (from ] ἔξοδος ''exodos'', "going out") is the ] of ]; its message is that the ] were delivered from slavery by ] and therefore belong to him through the ].{{sfn|Sparks|2010|p=73}}<ref group="Notes" name="Charter myth">"Charter (i.e., foundation) myths tell the story of a society's origins, and, in doing so, provide the ideological foundations for the culture and its institutions." (</ref> It tells of the enslavement of the Israelites in ] following the death of ], their departure under the leadership of ], the revelations at ] (including ]), and their wanderings in the wilderness up to the borders of ].{{sfn|Redmount|2001|p=59}} The exodus story is told in the books of ], ], ] and ], and their overall intent was to demonstrate God's actions in history, to recall Israel's bondage and salvation, and to demonstrate the fulfillment of Israel's covenant. {{sfn|Redmount|1998|p=63}} | ||
The historicity of the exodus continues to attract popular attention, but most histories of ancient Israel no longer consider information about it recoverable or even relevant to the story of Israel's emergence.{{sfn|Moore|Kelle|2011|p=81}} The |
The historicity of the exodus continues to attract popular attention, but most histories of ancient Israel no longer consider information about it recoverable or even relevant to the story of Israel's emergence.{{sfn|Moore|Kelle|2011|p=81}} The archaeological evidence does not support the story told in the Book of Exodus{{sfn|Meyers|2005|p=5-6}} and most archaeologists have therefore abandoned the investigation of Moses and the Exodus as "a fruitless pursuit".{{sfn|Dever|2001|p=99}} The opinion of the overwhelming majority of modern biblical scholars is that the exodus story was shaped into its final present form in the ],{{sfn|Enns|2012|p=26}} although the traditions behind it are older and can be traced in the writings of the 8th century BCE prophets.{{sfn|Lemche|1985|p=327}} How far beyond that the tradition might stretch cannot be told: "Presumably an original Exodus story lies hidden somewhere inside all the later revisions and alterations, but centuries of transmission have long obscured its presence, and its substance, accuracy and date are now difficult to determine."{{sfn|Redmount|1998|p=63}} | ||
The Exodus has been central to Judaism: it served to orient Jews towards the celebration of God's actions in history, in contrast to polytheistic celebrations of the gods' actions in nature, and even today it is recounted daily in ] and celebrated in the festival of ]. In secular history the exodus has served as inspiration and model for many groups, from early Protestant settlers fleeing persecution in Europe to 19th and 20th century African-Americans striving for freedom and civil rights.{{sfn|Tigay|2004|p=107}} | The Exodus has been central to Judaism: it served to orient Jews towards the celebration of God's actions in history, in contrast to polytheistic celebrations of the gods' actions in nature, and even today it is recounted daily in ] and celebrated in the festival of ]. In secular history the exodus has served as inspiration and model for many groups, from early Protestant settlers fleeing persecution in Europe to 19th and 20th century African-Americans striving for freedom and civil rights.{{sfn|Tigay|2004|p=107}} | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The opinion of the overwhelming majority of modern biblical scholars is that the ], or Pentateuch (the series of five books which consist of the ] plus the books in which the Exodus story is told) was shaped in the ].{{sfn|Enns|2012|p=26}} There are currently two important hypotheses explaining the background to this: the first is Persian Imperial authorisation, the idea that the post-exilic community needed a legal basis on which to function within the Persian Imperial system; the second relates to the community of citizens organised around the ], with the Pentateuch providing the criteria for who would belong to it (the narratives and genealogies in Genesis) and establishing the power structures and relative positions of its various groups.{{sfn|Ska|2006|p=217, 227–228}} In either case, the Book of Exodus forms a "]" for Israel: Israel was delivered from slavery by ] and therefore belongs to him through the covenant.{{sfn|Sparks|2010|p=73}} | The opinion of the overwhelming majority of modern biblical scholars is that the ], or Pentateuch (the series of five books which consist of the ] plus the books in which the Exodus story is told) was shaped in the ].{{sfn|Enns|2012|p=26}} There are currently two important hypotheses explaining the background to this: the first is Persian Imperial authorisation, the idea that the post-exilic community needed a legal basis on which to function within the Persian Imperial system; the second relates to the community of citizens organised around the ], with the Pentateuch providing the criteria for who would belong to it (the narratives and genealogies in Genesis) and establishing the power structures and relative positions of its various groups.{{sfn|Ska|2006|p=217, 227–228}} In either case, the Book of Exodus forms a "]" for Israel: Israel was delivered from slavery by ] and therefore belongs to him through the covenant.{{sfn|Sparks|2010|p=73}} | ||
The final form of the Pentateuch was based on earlier traditions.{{sfn|Carr|Conway|2010|p=193}} These have left traces in over 150 references throughout the ].{{sfn|Russell|2009|p=1}} The earliest are in the prophets ] (possibly) and ] (certainly), both active in 8th century BCE ]; in contrast |
The final form of the Pentateuch was based on earlier traditions.{{sfn|Carr|Conway|2010|p=193}} These have left traces in over 150 references throughout the ].{{sfn|Russell|2009|p=1}} The earliest are in the prophets ] (possibly) and ] (certainly), both active in 8th century BCE ]; in contrast to Micah, and thus it seems reasonable to conclude the Exodus tradition was important in the northern kingdom in the 8th century BCE, but not in Judah.{{sfn|Lemche|1985|p=327}} | ||
In a recent work, Stephen C. Russell traces the 8th century BCE prophetic tradition to three originally separate variants, in the northern ], in ], and in the southern ]. Russell proposes different hypothetical historical backgrounds to each tradition: the tradition from Israel, which involves a journey from Egypt to the region of ], he suggests is a memory of herders who could move to and from Egypt in times of crisis; for the Transjordanian tradition, which focuses on deliverance from Egypt without a journey, he suggests a memory of the withdrawal of Egyptian control at the end of the Late ]; and for Judah, whose tradition is preserved in the ], he suggests the celebration of a military victory over Egypt, although it is impossible to suggest what this victory may have been.{{sfn|Russell|2009|p=1}} | In a recent work, Stephen C. Russell traces the 8th century BCE prophetic tradition to three originally separate variants, in the northern ], in ], and in the southern ]. Russell proposes different hypothetical historical backgrounds to each tradition: the tradition from Israel, which involves a journey from Egypt to the region of ], he suggests is a memory of herders who could move to and from Egypt in times of crisis; for the Transjordanian tradition, which focuses on deliverance from Egypt without a journey, he suggests a memory of the withdrawal of Egyptian control at the end of the Late ]; and for Judah, whose tradition is preserved in the ], he suggests the celebration of a military victory over Egypt, although it is impossible to suggest what this victory may have been.{{sfn|Russell|2009|p=1}} | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
===Summary=== | ===Summary=== | ||
The archaeological data do not accord with what could be expected from the Bible's exodus story: there is no |
The archaeological data from these periods are virtually entirely lost, and thus do not accord with what could be expected from the Bible's exodus story: there is no traces remaining of the ] ever lived in ], the ] shows almost no sign of any occupation at all for the entire 2nd millennium BCE, and even ], where the Israelites are said to have spent 38 years, was uninhabited prior to the establishment of the Israelite monarchy.{{sfn|Redmount|2001|p=77}} | ||
Scholars generally agree that while the exodus narrative contains late 2nd millennium elements, it has not been demonstrated that these elements could not belong to any other period and they are consistent with "knowledge that a 1st millennium BCE writer trying to set an old story in Egypt could have known."{{sfn|Moore|Kelle|2011|p=90}} A few scholars, notably ] and ], continue to discuss the historicity, or at least plausibility, of the story, although historians of ancient Israel rarely respond.{{sfn|Moore|Kelle|2011|p=88-89}} | Scholars generally agree that while the exodus narrative contains late 2nd millennium elements, it has not been demonstrated that these elements could not belong to any other period and they are consistent with "knowledge that a 1st millennium BCE writer trying to set an old story in Egypt could have known."{{sfn|Moore|Kelle|2011|p=90}} A few scholars, notably ] and ], continue to discuss the historicity, or at least plausibility, of the story, although historians of ancient Israel rarely respond.{{sfn|Moore|Kelle|2011|p=88-89}} | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
===Anachronisms=== | ===Anachronisms=== | ||
Despite the Bible's internal dating of the Exodus to the 2nd millennium |
Despite the Bible's internal dating of the Exodus to the 2nd millennium BC, some attempt to show details that point to a 1st millennium date for the composition of the ]: ], (one of the ]), for example, dates to a period between the 8th and 6th centuries BCE with possible further occupation into the 4th century BCE,{{sfn|Practico|1985|p=1–32}} and those place-names on the Exodus route which have been identified – ], ], ], ] and ] – point to the geography of the 1st millennium rather than the 2nd.{{sfn|Van Seters|1997|p=255ff}} However, a dating anywhere near the 4th, 6th, or 8th century BC has been seemingly utterly inconsequential at the discovery of the Silver Scrolls, which contain the oldest known portions of the Pentateuch of the Old Testament dating to the 7th century BC,<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.bpnews.net/17741|title='Silver scrolls' are oldest O.T. scripture, archaeologist says|last=Myers|first=Gary D.|website=www.bpnews.net|access-date=2016-10-25}}</ref> forcing the overall dating of the Pentateuch to be much earlier, in co-ordinance with the internal dating of the Pentateuch to the 2nd millenium BC. | ||
Similarly, the ]'s fear that the ] might ally themselves with foreign invaders seems unlikely in the context of the late 2nd millennium, when ] was part of an ] and Egypt faced no enemies in that direction, but does make sense in a 1st millennium context, when Egypt was considerably weaker and faced invasion first from the ] and later from the ].{{sfn|Soggin|1998|p=128–129}} | Similarly, the ]'s fear that the ] might ally themselves with foreign invaders seems unlikely in the context of the late 2nd millennium, when ] was part of an ] and Egypt faced no enemies in that direction, but does make sense in a 1st millennium context, when Egypt was considerably weaker and faced invasion first from the ] and later from the ].{{sfn|Soggin|1998|p=128–129}} However, Pharaoh was likely angry at Israel for their mere attempting to escape, rather than actually allying themselves with foreign nations. | ||
The mention of the ] in Exodus 9:3 also suggests a later date of composition – the widespread domestication of the ] as a herd animal is thought not to have taken place before the late 2nd millennium, after the Israelites had already emerged in Canaan,{{sfn|Finkelstein|Silberman|2002|p=334}} and they did not become widespread in Egypt until c.200–100 BCE.{{sfn|Faye|2002|p=3}} | The mention of the ] in Exodus 9:3 also suggests a later date of composition – the widespread domestication of the ] as a herd animal is thought not to have taken place before the late 2nd millennium, after the Israelites had already emerged in Canaan,{{sfn|Finkelstein|Silberman|2002|p=334}} and they did not become widespread in Egypt until c.200–100 BCE.{{sfn|Faye|2002|p=3}} | ||
===Chronology=== | ===Chronology=== | ||
The chronology of the Exodus story likewise underlines |
The chronology of the Exodus story likewise underlines a generally historical nature, revolving around Egyptian political states and the exodus, however may also contain religious underlinings. The number seven was sacred to ] in ], and so the ] arrive at the ], where they will meet God, at the beginning of the seventh week after their departure from Egypt,{{sfn|Meyers|2005|p=143}} while the erection of the ], God's dwelling-place among his people, occurs in the year 2666 ], two-thirds of the way through a four thousand year era which culminates in or around the re-dedication of the ] in 164 BCE.{{sfn|Hayes|Miller|1986|p=59}}{{sfn|Davies|1998|p=180}}<ref group="Notes" name="Chronology">See Thompson, , for an overview of the place of the exodus in the biblical chronology.</ref> This interpretation however, can only be made by young earth creationists. | ||
===Route=== | ===Route=== | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
===Dating the Exodus=== | ===Dating the Exodus=== | ||
Attempts to date the Exodus to a specific century have been inconclusive.{{sfn|Killebrew|2005|p=151}} {{bibleverse|1|Kings|6:1|HE}} places the event 480 years before the construction of ], implying an Exodus at c.1446 BCE, but |
Attempts to date the Exodus to a specific century have been inconclusive.{{sfn|Killebrew|2005|p=151}} {{bibleverse|1|Kings|6:1|HE}} places the event 480 years before the construction of ], implying an Exodus at c.1446 BCE, but some likewise claim that the number in 1 Kings merely represents twelve generations of forty years each.{{sfn|Shea|2003|p=238–239}} However, this interpretation has been noted to not work for several reasons.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2009/03/30/The-Biblical-Date-for-the-Exodus-is-1446-BC-A-Response-to-James-Hoffmeier.aspx|title=The Biblical Date for the Exodus is 1446 BC: A Response to James Hoffmeier|last=PhD|first=Bryant G. Wood|website=www.biblearchaeology.org|access-date=2016-10-25}}</ref> Apart from 1 Kings 6:1, both and converge on a dating of the 15th century BC, implying very good reason to accept a dating of the 15th century BC to a number of Scholars<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2009/10/19/Recent-Research-on-the-Date-and-Setting-of-the-Exodus.aspx|title=Recent Research on the Date and Setting of the Exodus|last=PhD|first=Bryant G. Wood|website=www.biblearchaeology.org|access-date=2016-10-25}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=bible.org/article/introduction-pentateuch|title=An Introduction to the Pentateuch|last=Malick|first=David|date=May 5th 2004|website=bible.org|publisher=|access-date=October 25th 2016}}</ref> There are major archaeological obstacles to an earlier date: ] was part of the ], so that the ] would in effect be escaping from Egypt to Egypt, and its cities were unwalled and do not show destruction layers consistent with the Bible's account of the occupation of the land (e.g., ] was "small and poor, almost insignificant, and unfortified (and) here was also no sign of a destruction". (Finkelstein and Silberman, 2002).{{sfn|Finkelstein|Silberman|2002|p=77–79, 82}} ], the leading biblical archaeologist of the mid-20th century, proposed a date of around 1250–1200 BCE, but his so-called "Israelite" evidence (], the ]s, etc.) are continuations of Canaanite culture.{{sfn|Killebrew|2005|p=175–177}} | ||
==Possible sources and parallels== | ==Possible sources and parallels== |
Revision as of 21:13, 25 October 2016
This article is about the events related in the Torah. For the second book of the Torah and the Old Testament, see Book of Exodus. For other uses, see Exodus (disambiguation).The Exodus (from Greek ἔξοδος exodos, "going out") is the founding of Israel; its message is that the Israelites were delivered from slavery by Yahweh and therefore belong to him through the Mosaic covenant. It tells of the enslavement of the Israelites in Egypt following the death of Joseph, their departure under the leadership of Moses, the revelations at Sinai (including the Ten Commandments), and their wanderings in the wilderness up to the borders of Canaan. The exodus story is told in the books of Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy, and their overall intent was to demonstrate God's actions in history, to recall Israel's bondage and salvation, and to demonstrate the fulfillment of Israel's covenant.
The historicity of the exodus continues to attract popular attention, but most histories of ancient Israel no longer consider information about it recoverable or even relevant to the story of Israel's emergence. The archaeological evidence does not support the story told in the Book of Exodus and most archaeologists have therefore abandoned the investigation of Moses and the Exodus as "a fruitless pursuit". The opinion of the overwhelming majority of modern biblical scholars is that the exodus story was shaped into its final present form in the post-Exilic period, although the traditions behind it are older and can be traced in the writings of the 8th century BCE prophets. How far beyond that the tradition might stretch cannot be told: "Presumably an original Exodus story lies hidden somewhere inside all the later revisions and alterations, but centuries of transmission have long obscured its presence, and its substance, accuracy and date are now difficult to determine."
The Exodus has been central to Judaism: it served to orient Jews towards the celebration of God's actions in history, in contrast to polytheistic celebrations of the gods' actions in nature, and even today it is recounted daily in Jewish prayers and celebrated in the festival of Pesach. In secular history the exodus has served as inspiration and model for many groups, from early Protestant settlers fleeing persecution in Europe to 19th and 20th century African-Americans striving for freedom and civil rights.
Origins
The opinion of the overwhelming majority of modern biblical scholars is that the Torah, or Pentateuch (the series of five books which consist of the Book of Genesis plus the books in which the Exodus story is told) was shaped in the post-exilic period. There are currently two important hypotheses explaining the background to this: the first is Persian Imperial authorisation, the idea that the post-exilic community needed a legal basis on which to function within the Persian Imperial system; the second relates to the community of citizens organised around the Temple, with the Pentateuch providing the criteria for who would belong to it (the narratives and genealogies in Genesis) and establishing the power structures and relative positions of its various groups. In either case, the Book of Exodus forms a "charter myth" for Israel: Israel was delivered from slavery by Yahweh and therefore belongs to him through the covenant.
The final form of the Pentateuch was based on earlier traditions. These have left traces in over 150 references throughout the Bible. The earliest are in the prophets Amos (possibly) and Hosea (certainly), both active in 8th century BCE Israel; in contrast to Micah, and thus it seems reasonable to conclude the Exodus tradition was important in the northern kingdom in the 8th century BCE, but not in Judah.
In a recent work, Stephen C. Russell traces the 8th century BCE prophetic tradition to three originally separate variants, in the northern Kingdom of Israel, in Transjordan, and in the southern Kingdom of Judah. Russell proposes different hypothetical historical backgrounds to each tradition: the tradition from Israel, which involves a journey from Egypt to the region of Bethel, he suggests is a memory of herders who could move to and from Egypt in times of crisis; for the Transjordanian tradition, which focuses on deliverance from Egypt without a journey, he suggests a memory of the withdrawal of Egyptian control at the end of the Late Bronze Age; and for Judah, whose tradition is preserved in the Song of the Sea, he suggests the celebration of a military victory over Egypt, although it is impossible to suggest what this victory may have been.
Cultural significance
Main article: PassoverThe exodus is remembered daily in Jewish prayers and celebrated each year at the feast of Passover. The Hebrew name for this festival, Pesach, refers to God's instruction to the Israelites to prepare unleavened bread as they would be leaving Egypt in haste, and to mark their doors with the blood of slaughtered sheep so that the "Angel of Death" or "the destroyer" tasked with killing the first-born of Egypt would "pass over" them. Despite the Exodus story, a majority of scholars do not believe that the Passover festival originated as described in the biblical story.
Jewish tradition has preserved national and personal reminders of this pivotal narrative in daily life. Examples include the wearing of tefillin (phylacteries) on the arm and forehead, the wearing of tzitzit (knotted ritual fringes attached to the four corners of the prayer shawl), the eating of matzot (unleavened bread) during the Pesach, the fasting of the firstborn a day before Pesach, and the redemption of firstborn children and animals.
Historicity
Summary
The archaeological data from these periods are virtually entirely lost, and thus do not accord with what could be expected from the Bible's exodus story: there is no traces remaining of the Israelites ever lived in Ancient Egypt, the Sinai Peninsula shows almost no sign of any occupation at all for the entire 2nd millennium BCE, and even Kadesh-Barnea, where the Israelites are said to have spent 38 years, was uninhabited prior to the establishment of the Israelite monarchy.
Scholars generally agree that while the exodus narrative contains late 2nd millennium elements, it has not been demonstrated that these elements could not belong to any other period and they are consistent with "knowledge that a 1st millennium BCE writer trying to set an old story in Egypt could have known." A few scholars, notably Kenneth Kitchen and James K. Hoffmeier, continue to discuss the historicity, or at least plausibility, of the story, although historians of ancient Israel rarely respond.
Numbers and logistics
According to Exodus 12:37–38, the Israelites numbered "about six hundred thousand men on foot, besides women and children," plus many non-Israelites and livestock. Numbers 1:46 gives a more precise total of 603,550 men aged 20 and up. It is difficult to reconcile the idea of 600,000 Israelite fighting men with the information that the Israelites were afraid of the Philistines and Egyptians. The 600,000, plus wives, children, the elderly, and the "mixed multitude" of non-Israelites would have numbered some 2 million people. Marching ten abreast, and without accounting for livestock, they would have formed a line 150 miles long. The entire Egyptian population in 1250 BCE is estimated to have been around 3 to 3.5 million, and no evidence has been found that Egypt ever suffered the demographic and economic catastrophe such a loss of population would represent, nor that the Sinai desert ever hosted (or could have hosted) these millions of people and their herds.
Some have rationalised the numbers into smaller figures, for example reading the Hebrew as "600 families" rather than 600,000 men, but all such solutions have their own set of problems. The most probable explanation is that 600,000 symbolises the total destruction of the generation of Israel which left Egypt, none of whom lived to see the Promised Land, while the 603,550 is a gematria (a code in which numbers represent letters or words) for bnei yisra'el kol rosh, "the children of Israel, every individual".
Archaeology
A century of research by archaeologists and Egyptologists has found no evidence which can be directly related to the Exodus captivity and the escape and travels through the wilderness, and archaeologists generally agree that the Israelites had Canaanite origins. The culture of the earliest Israelite settlements is Canaanite, their cult-objects are those of the Canaanite god El, the pottery remains are in the Canaanite tradition, and the alphabet used is early Canaanite. Almost the sole marker distinguishing the "Israelite" villages from Canaanite sites is an absence of pig bones, although whether even this is an ethnic marker or is due to other factors remains a matter of dispute.
Anachronisms
Despite the Bible's internal dating of the Exodus to the 2nd millennium BC, some attempt to show details that point to a 1st millennium date for the composition of the Book of Exodus: Ezion-Geber, (one of the Stations of the Exodus), for example, dates to a period between the 8th and 6th centuries BCE with possible further occupation into the 4th century BCE, and those place-names on the Exodus route which have been identified – Goshen, Pithom, Succoth, Ramesses and Kadesh Barnea – point to the geography of the 1st millennium rather than the 2nd. However, a dating anywhere near the 4th, 6th, or 8th century BC has been seemingly utterly inconsequential at the discovery of the Silver Scrolls, which contain the oldest known portions of the Pentateuch of the Old Testament dating to the 7th century BC, forcing the overall dating of the Pentateuch to be much earlier, in co-ordinance with the internal dating of the Pentateuch to the 2nd millenium BC.
Similarly, the Pharaoh's fear that the Israelites might ally themselves with foreign invaders seems unlikely in the context of the late 2nd millennium, when Canaan was part of an Egyptian empire and Egypt faced no enemies in that direction, but does make sense in a 1st millennium context, when Egypt was considerably weaker and faced invasion first from the Achaemenid Empire and later from the Seleucid Empire. However, Pharaoh was likely angry at Israel for their mere attempting to escape, rather than actually allying themselves with foreign nations.
The mention of the dromedary in Exodus 9:3 also suggests a later date of composition – the widespread domestication of the camel as a herd animal is thought not to have taken place before the late 2nd millennium, after the Israelites had already emerged in Canaan, and they did not become widespread in Egypt until c.200–100 BCE.
Chronology
The chronology of the Exodus story likewise underlines a generally historical nature, revolving around Egyptian political states and the exodus, however may also contain religious underlinings. The number seven was sacred to God in Judaism, and so the Israelites arrive at the Sinai Peninsula, where they will meet God, at the beginning of the seventh week after their departure from Egypt, while the erection of the Tabernacle, God's dwelling-place among his people, occurs in the year 2666 after God creates the world, two-thirds of the way through a four thousand year era which culminates in or around the re-dedication of the Second Temple in 164 BCE. This interpretation however, can only be made by young earth creationists.
Route
Main article: Stations of the ExodusThe Torah lists the places where the Israelites rested. A few of the names at the start of the itinerary, including Ra'amses, Pithom and Succoth, are reasonably well identified with archaeological sites on the eastern edge of the Nile Delta, as is Kadesh-Barnea, where the Israelites spend 38 years after turning back from Canaan, but other than that very little is certain. The crossing of the Red Sea has been variously placed at the Pelusic branch of the Nile, anywhere along the network of Bitter Lakes and smaller canals that formed a barrier toward eastward escape, the Gulf of Suez (SSE of Succoth) and the Gulf of Aqaba (S of Ezion-Geber), or even on a lagoon on the Mediterranean coast. The Biblical Mount Sinai is identified in Christian tradition with Jebel Musa in the south of the Sinai Peninsula, but this association dates only from the 3rd century CE and no evidence of the Exodus has been found there.
Dating the Exodus
Attempts to date the Exodus to a specific century have been inconclusive. 1 Kings 6:1 places the event 480 years before the construction of Solomon's Temple, implying an Exodus at c.1446 BCE, but some likewise claim that the number in 1 Kings merely represents twelve generations of forty years each. However, this interpretation has been noted to not work for several reasons. Apart from 1 Kings 6:1, both Judges 11:26 and 1 Chronicles 6:33-37converge on a dating of the 15th century BC, implying very good reason to accept a dating of the 15th century BC to a number of Scholars There are major archaeological obstacles to an earlier date: Canaan was part of the Egyptian empire, so that the Israelites would in effect be escaping from Egypt to Egypt, and its cities were unwalled and do not show destruction layers consistent with the Bible's account of the occupation of the land (e.g., Jericho was "small and poor, almost insignificant, and unfortified (and) here was also no sign of a destruction". (Finkelstein and Silberman, 2002). William F. Albright, the leading biblical archaeologist of the mid-20th century, proposed a date of around 1250–1200 BCE, but his so-called "Israelite" evidence (house-type, the collar-rimmed jars, etc.) are continuations of Canaanite culture.
Possible sources and parallels
Manetho and other Greek-period texts
The Hyksos ruled over the Nile Delta in the 2nd millennium BCE until expelled by the Egyptians. While the only elements they shared with the Israelites was that both groups were, from Egyptian perspective, "Asians" who were at some point connected to Canaan, it is possible that a vague memory of these events may have formed the basis for the Israelite exodus tradition. The Greek author Hecataeus of Abdera (c.320 BCE) wrote a history of Egypt in which he told how the Egyptians blamed a plague on foreigners and expelled them from the country, whereupon Moses, their leader, took them to Canaan. The most famous Greek-era mention of an exodus-like event is by the Egyptian historian Manetho (3rd century BCE), known from two quotations by the 1st century CE Jewish historian Josephus. In the first, Manetho describes the Hyksos, their lowly origins in Asia, their dominion over and expulsion from Egypt, and their subsequent foundation of the city of Jerusalem and its temple. Josephus (not Manetho) identifies the Hyksos with the Jews. In the second story Manetho tells how 80,000 lepers and other "impure people", led by a priest named Osarseph, join forces with the former Hyksos, now living in Jerusalem, to take over Egypt. They wreak havoc until eventually the pharaoh and his son chase them out to the borders of Syria, where Osarseph gives the lepers a law-code and changes his name to Moses, although the identification of Osarseph with Moses in the second account may be a later addition.
Ipuwer
The "Ipuwer Papyrus" is thought to have been written in the Thirteenth dynasty of Egypt (18th century BCE), and certainly no earlier than the 12th Dynasty. Written in the form of a dialogue, the sage Ipuwer accuses both the creator-god Ra and the king of having neglected their roles, as a result of which the social order is overturned and disasters fill the land. Ipuwer has been put forward in popular literature as an Egyptian confirmation of the exodus account, most notably because of its statement that "the river is blood" and its frequent references to servants running away, but these arguments ignore the many points on which Ipuwer contradicts Exodus, such as the fact that Ipuwer's Asiatics are arriving in Egypt rather than leaving, and the likelihood that the "river is blood" phrase refers to the red sediment colouring the Nile during disastrous floods. Scholars have identified this and similar works (Ipuwer being the most ambitious) as examples of a common Egyptian literary genre, with little or no basis in historical events.
See also
- Invented tradition
- Va'eira, Bo, and Beshalach: Torah portions telling the Exodus story
Notes
- "Charter (i.e., foundation) myths tell the story of a society's origins, and, in doing so, provide the ideological foundations for the culture and its institutions." (Sparks (2010), p.73
- See Thompson, The Mythic Past (1999), pages 73 and following, for an overview of the place of the exodus in the biblical chronology.
References
Citations
- ^ Sparks 2010, p. 73. sfn error: no target: CITEREFSparks2010 (help)
- Redmount 2001, p. 59.
- ^ Redmount 1998, p. 63. sfn error: no target: CITEREFRedmount1998 (help)
- Moore & Kelle 2011, p. 81.
- Meyers 2005, p. 5-6.
- Dever 2001, p. 99.
- ^ Enns 2012, p. 26.
- ^ Lemche 1985, p. 327.
- Tigay 2004, p. 107.
- Ska 2006, p. 217, 227–228.
- Carr & Conway 2010, p. 193.
- ^ Russell 2009, p. 1.
- Tigay 2005, p. 106–107. sfn error: no target: CITEREFTigay2005 (help)
- Prosic 2004, p. 31.
- Redmount 2001, p. 77.
- Moore & Kelle 2011, p. 90.
- Moore & Kelle 2011, p. 88-89.
- Exodus 12 Archived 2008-12-01 at the Wayback Machine
- Numbers 1 Archived 2008-09-05 at the Wayback Machine
- Miller 2009, p. 256.
- ^ Kantor 2005, p. 70.
- Cline 2007, p. 74.
- Butzer 1999, p. 297.
- Dever 2003, p. 19.
- Grisanti 2011, p. 240ff.
- Guillaume 1980, p. 8, 15. sfn error: no target: CITEREFGuillaume1980 (help)
- Beitzel 1980, p. 6–7.
- Meyers 2005, p. 5.
- Shaw 2002, p. 313.
- ^ Killebrew 2005, p. 176.
- Practico 1985, p. 1–32.
- ^ Van Seters 1997, p. 255ff.
- Myers, Gary D. "'Silver scrolls' are oldest O.T. scripture, archaeologist says". www.bpnews.net. Retrieved 2016-10-25.
- Soggin 1998, p. 128–129.
- Finkelstein & Silberman 2002, p. 334. sfn error: no target: CITEREFFinkelsteinSilberman2002 (help)
- Faye 2002, p. 3. sfn error: no target: CITEREFFaye2002 (help)
- Meyers 2005, p. 143.
- Hayes & Miller 1986, p. 59.
- Davies 1998, p. 180.
- Hoffmeier 2005, p. 115ff.
- Killebrew 2005, p. 151.
- Shea 2003, p. 238–239.
- PhD, Bryant G. Wood. "The Biblical Date for the Exodus is 1446 BC: A Response to James Hoffmeier". www.biblearchaeology.org. Retrieved 2016-10-25.
- PhD, Bryant G. Wood. "Recent Research on the Date and Setting of the Exodus". www.biblearchaeology.org. Retrieved 2016-10-25.
- Malick, David (May 5th 2004). . bible.org. Retrieved October 25th 2016.
{{cite web}}
: Check|url=
value (help); Check date values in:|access-date=
and|date=
(help) - Finkelstein & Silberman 2002, p. 77–79, 82. sfn error: no target: CITEREFFinkelsteinSilberman2002 (help)
- Killebrew 2005, p. 175–177.
- Finkelstein & Silberman 2002, p. 69. sfn error: no target: CITEREFFinkelsteinSilberman2002 (help)
- Oblath 2004, p. 21.
- Droge 1996, p. 134.
- Assmann 2009, p. 34.
- Droge 1996, p. 121–122.
- Droge 1996, p. 134–135.
- Feldman 1998, p. 342.
- Willems 2010, p. 83. sfn error: no target: CITEREFWillems2010 (help)
- Grabbe 2014, p. 68. sfn error: no target: CITEREFGrabbe2014 (help)
- Perdue 2008, p. 22.
- Enmarch 2011, p. 173-175.
- Lichtheim 1975, p. 134-135. sfn error: no target: CITEREFLichtheim1975 (help)
Bibliography
- Assmann, Jan (2009). "Moses the Egyptian: The Memory of Egypt". Oxford Bible Commentary. Harvard University Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Beitzel, Barry (Spring 1980). "Exodus 3:14 and the divine Name: A Case of Biblical Paronomasia" (PDF). Trinity Journal (Trinity Divinity School). 1: 5–20.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Berman, Joshua (March 2, 2015). "Was There an Exodus?". Mosaic.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Butzer, Karl W. (1999). "Demographics". In Bard, Kathryn A.; Shubert, Steven (eds.). Encyclopedia of the archaeology of ancient Egypt. Routledge. ISBN 0-907459-04-8.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Carr, David M.; Conway, Colleen M. (2010). "Introduction to the Pentateuch". An Introduction to the Bible: Sacred Texts and Imperial Contexts. John Wiley & Sons.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Cline, Eric H. (2007). From Eden to Exile. National Geographic Society. ISBN 9781426200847.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Davies, Graham (2001). "Introduction to the Pentateuch". In Barton, John (ed.). Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford University Press. p. 37.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Davies, Graham (2004). "Was There an Exodus?". In Day, John (ed.). In search of pre-exilic Israel: proceedings of the Oxford Old Testament Seminar. Continuum.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Davies, Philip (1998). Scribes and Schools: The Canonization of the Hebrew Scriptures. Westminster John Knox.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Dever, William (2001). What Did the Biblical Writers Know, and When Did They Know It?. Eerdmans. ISBN 3-927120-37-5.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Dever, William (2003). Who Were the Early Israelites and Where Did They Come From?. Eerdmans. ISBN 3-927120-37-5.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Droge, Arthur J. (1996). "Josephus Between Greeks and Barbarians". In Feldman, L.H.; Levison, J.R. (eds.). Josephus' Contra Apion. Brill.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Enmarch, Roland (2011). "The Reception of a Middle Egyptian Poem: The Dialogue of Ipuwer and the Lord of All". In Collier, M.; Snape, S. (eds.). Ramesside Studies in Honour of K. A. Kitchen (PDF). Rutherford.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Enns, Peter (2012). The Evolution of Adam. Baker Books.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Faye, Bernard (2013). "Classification, History and Distribution of the Camel". In Kadim, Isam T.; Mahgoub, Osman; Faye, Bernard (eds.). Camel Meat and Meat Products. CABI.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Feldman, Louis H. (1998). Josephus's interpretation of the Bible. University of California Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Finkelstein, Israel; Silberman, Neil Asher (2001). The Bible Unearthed. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-86912-8.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Gmirkin, Russell E. (2006). Berossus and Genesis, Manetho and Exodus: Hellenistic Histories and The Date of the Pentateuch. T & T Clark International.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Grisanti, Michael A. (2011). "The Book of Numbers". In Merrill, Eugene H.; Rooker, Mark; Grisanti, Michael A. (eds.). The World and the Word. B&H Publishing.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Guillaume, Philippe. "Tracing the Origin of the Sabbatical Calendar in the Priestly Narrative, Genesis 1 to Joshua 5" (PDF). Journal of Hebrew Scriptures. 5, article 13, Spring 1980. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 11, 2005.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help); Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - Hayes, John Haralson; Miller, James Maxwell (1986). A History of Ancient Israel and Judah. Westminster John Knox.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Hoffmeier, James K (1999). Israel in Egypt. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195130881.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Hoffmeier, James K (2005). Ancient Israel in Sinai. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195155464.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Kantor, Mattis (2005). Codex Judaica. Zichron Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Killebrew, Anne E. (2005). Biblical Peoples and Ethnicity. Society of Biblical Literature.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Kitchen, Kenneth (2006). "Egyptology and the traditions of early Hebrew antiquity (Genesis and Exodus)". In Rogerson, John William; Lieu, Judith (eds.). The Oxford handbook of biblical studies. Oxford University Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Knight, Douglas A (1995). "Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomist". In Mays, James Luther; Petersen, David L.; Richards, Kent Harold (eds.). Old Testament Interpretation. T&T Clark.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Lemche, Niels Peter (1985). Early Israel: anthropological and historical studies. Brill.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Levinson, Bernard Malcolm (1997). Deuteronomy and the hermeneutics of legal innovation. OUP.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Lichtheim, Miriam (2006). Ancient Egyptian Literature: The Old and Middle Kingdoms. Vol. 1. University of California Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - McDowell, Sean (2010). Apologetics Study Bible For Students. B&H Publishing Group.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - McEntire, Mark (2008). Struggling with God: An Introduction to the Pentateuch. Mercer University Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Meyers, Carol (2005). Exodus. Cambridge University Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Moore, Megan Bishop; Kelle, Brad E. (2011). Biblical History and Israel's Past. Eerdmans.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Miller, William T. (2009). The Book of Exodus: Question by Question. Paulist Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Noll, K.L. (2001). Canaan and Israel in Antiquity: An Introduction. Sheffield Academic Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Oblath, Michael D. (2004). The Exodus Itinerary Sites: Their Locations from the Perspective of the Biblical Sources. Peter Lang. p. 21. ISBN 978-0-8204-6716-0.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Perdue, Leo G. (2008). The Sword and the Stylus: An Introduction to Wisdom in the Age of Empires. Eerdmans.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Practico, Gary D. (Summer 1985). "Nelson Glueck's 1938–1940 Excavations at Tell el-Kheleifeh: A Reappraisal". Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research (BASOR). No. 259: 1–32.
{{cite journal}}
:|volume=
has extra text (help); Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Prosic, Tamara (2004). The Development and Symbolism of Passover. A&C Black.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Redmount, Carol A. (2001). "Bitter Lives: Israel In And Out of Egypt". In Coogan, Michael D. (ed.). The Oxford History of the Biblical World. OUP.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Rofé, Alexander (2002). Deuteronomy: Issues and Interpretation. T&T Clark.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Rogerson, John W (2003). "Deuteronomy". In Dunn, James D. G. (ed.). Eerdmans Commentary on the Bible. Eerdmans.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Russell, Stephen C. (2009). Images of Egypt in early biblical literature. Walter de Gruyter.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Shaw, Ian (2002). "Israel, Israelites". In Shaw, Ian; Jameson, Robert (eds.). A dictionary of archaeology. Wiley Blackwell.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Shea, William H. (2003). "The Date of the Exodus". In Grisanti, Michael A.; Howard, David M. (eds.). Giving the Sense: Understanding and Using Old Testament Historical Texts. Kregel Academic.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Ska, Jean Louis (2006). Introduction to Reading the Pentateuch. Eisenbrauns.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Soggin, John (1998). An Introduction to the History of Israel and Judah (tr. 1999). SCM Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Sparkes, Kenton L. (2010). "Genre Criticism". In Dozeman, Thomas B. (ed.). Methods for Exodus. Cambridge University Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Sparks, B.C. (2015). "Egyptian Texts Relating to the Exodus". In Levy, Thomas E.; Schneider, Thomas; Propp, William H.C. (eds.). Israel's Exodus in Transdisciplinary Perspective: Text, Archaeology, Culture, and Geoscience. Springer.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Stiebing, William H. (1989). Out of the Desert: Archaeology and the Exodus/Conquest Narratives. Prometheus.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Thompson, Thomas L. (1999). The Mythic Past: Biblical Archaeology And The Myth Of Israel. Basic Books.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Tigay, Jeffrey H. (2004). "Exodus". In Berlin, Adele; Brettler, Marc Zvi (eds.). The Jewish study Bible. Oxford University Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Van Seters, John (1997). "The Geography of the Exodus". In Silberman, Neil Ash (ed.). The land that I will show you. Sheffield Academic Press. ISBN 978-1850756507.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Whitelam, Keith W. (2006). "General problems of studying the text of the bible...". In Rogerson, John William; Lieu, Judith (eds.). The Oxford handbook of biblical studies. Oxford University Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)
Passover | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seder |
| ||||||||||
Haggadah |
| ||||||||||
Foods |
| ||||||||||
Religious |
|