Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ya ya ya ya ya ya: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:40, 9 September 2006 editChacor (talk | contribs)13,600 edits new CU case  Revision as of 01:44, 9 September 2006 edit undoChacor (talk | contribs)13,600 edits Ya ya ya ya ya yaNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
* {{checkip|70.17.208.155}} * {{checkip|70.17.208.155}}


http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Vicente_Fox&curid=32836&action=history ], ], ] - please see ] &ndash; ]] 01:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Vicente_Fox&curid=32836&action=history ], ], ] - please see ]. Basically, Ya ya ya ya ya ya, who's awfully new but seems to know his way around very well, has gotten into an NPOV dispute and unilaterally blanked much of the ] article. When bits of that were reverted, by myself as well as others, he kept reverting them until he hit three reverts - then the IP came along and removed exactly the same text - what are the chances? This is a gross violation of most importantly ]. &ndash; ]] 01:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


<!--Please do not remove the following tag until this case has been listed on RFCU. --> <!--Please do not remove the following tag until this case has been listed on RFCU. -->

Revision as of 01:44, 9 September 2006

Ya ya ya ya ya ya

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Vicente_Fox&curid=32836&action=history WP:3RR, WP:OWN, WP:CIV - please see Talk:Vicente Fox#NPOV 3. Basically, Ya ya ya ya ya ya, who's awfully new but seems to know his way around very well, has gotten into an NPOV dispute and unilaterally blanked much of the Vicente Fox article. When bits of that were reverted, by myself as well as others, he kept reverting them until he hit three reverts - then the IP came along and removed exactly the same text - what are the chances? This is a gross violation of most importantly WP:OWN. – Chacor 01:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)