| Revision as of 15:58, 22 August 2006 editPropol (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,703 edits Delete personal attack.← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:29, 9 September 2006 edit undoJoehazelton (talk | contribs)313 edits You watch itNext edit → | ||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
| I was asked, as I set out, in a bit more detail, at ], to act as an ] for ] relative to the Roskam article, and I have attempted to delineate precisely those issues about which Joe is concerned and to frame several questions rather clearly in order that a focused discussion might be undertaken. On Joe's behalf, and in view of my appreciation for the advancement of the project, I'd ask that, at your leisure, you offer your views at the Roskam talk page. Thanks very kindly in advance! ] 05:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | I was asked, as I set out, in a bit more detail, at ], to act as an ] for ] relative to the Roskam article, and I have attempted to delineate precisely those issues about which Joe is concerned and to frame several questions rather clearly in order that a focused discussion might be undertaken. On Joe's behalf, and in view of my appreciation for the advancement of the project, I'd ask that, at your leisure, you offer your views at the Roskam talk page. Thanks very kindly in advance! ] 05:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :I posted a response at ]. Thanks. ] 18:08, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | :I posted a response at ]. Thanks. ] 18:08, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Warning - 3RR== | |||
| {{3rr}} | |||
| ] 05:24, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:29, 9 September 2006
Hi.
Welcome
|
roskam
Hi Propol,
I'm wondering why you oppose adding the Josh Marshall text to the Roskam article. Feel free to reply here — goethean ॐ 18:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Peter Roskam
I was asked, as I set out, in a bit more detail, at Talk:Peter Roskam, to act as an advocate for Joehazelton relative to the Roskam article, and I have attempted to delineate precisely those issues about which Joe is concerned and to frame several questions rather clearly in order that a focused discussion might be undertaken. On Joe's behalf, and in view of my appreciation for the advancement of the project, I'd ask that, at your leisure, you offer your views at the Roskam talk page. Thanks very kindly in advance! Joe 05:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- I posted a response at Talk:Peter Roskam. Thanks. Propol 18:08, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Warning - 3RR
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Propol 05:24, 9 September 2006 (UTC)