| Revision as of 15:24, 29 October 2016 edit185.75.56.168 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:38, 29 October 2016 edit undoKGirlTrucker81 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers64,703 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on Onogurs. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| - so - this is how Turkish science works? Ban the others from editting? | - so - this is how Turkish science works? Ban the others from editting? | ||
| == October 2016 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ]<sup> ] ]</sup> 15:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 15:38, 29 October 2016
Onogurs
You done 9 reverts on the article of Onogurs in less than 24 hours, which is double violation of the WP:3RR. It is more than obvious to be an IP sock related to blocked User:PavelStaykov. Stop it, if not the IP will be reported at ANI for an indefinite block.--Crovata (talk) 15:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- so - this is how Turkish science works? Ban the others from editting?
October 2016
Your recent editing history at Onogurs shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. KGirlTrucker81 15:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.