| Revision as of 21:51, 8 September 2006 view sourceCentrx (talk | contribs)37,287 edits "directly contradicts this proposal" is rather severe, and it directly contradicts current policy and practice too← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:46, 9 September 2006 view source Andrejj (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,112 editsm sl:Wikipedija:PomembnostNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 08:46, 9 September 2006
 | The following is a proposed Misplaced Pages policy, guideline, or process. The proposal may still be in development, under discussion, or in the process of gathering consensus for adoption. | Shortcut
|
| Notability |
|---|
| General notability guideline |
| Subject-specific guidelines |
| See also |
- If you are expecting to read the essay on evaluating notability, it has been moved to Misplaced Pages:Notability/Arguments.
Based on several sections in the policy on What Misplaced Pages is not, it is generally agreed that topics in most areas must exceed a certain threshhold of notability in order to have an article in Misplaced Pages.
Several guidelines (see table on the right) have been created, or are under discussion, to define more precisely what these thresholds should be.
Articles on non-notable subjects are frequently nominated for Proposed Deletion and Articles for Deletion, and are frequently deleted via those processes, as can be seen through precedents.
See also
This page documents the status quo. There are (and have been) several proposals to modify the status quo, such as:
- Misplaced Pages:Notability proposal, a failed proposal.
- Misplaced Pages:Non-notability, an active proposal to change current practice.