| Revision as of 21:57, 9 September 2006 editHeimstern (talk | contribs)Administrators16,881 edits reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:01, 9 September 2006 edit undo86.143.175.215 (talk) that's the linkNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and it has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.<!-- Template:Test (first level warning) -->]] 21:46, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==You have committed 3RR violation on several articles == | |||
| ] and ], in addition to vandalism. | |||
| :If you persist, you will be reported and blocked. This is my last official warning. | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages under the ], which states that nobody may ] a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the ''effect'' of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> | |||
| ] 21:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Do not remove warnings == | |||
| Please stop. If you continue to remove legitimate warning messages from your talk page, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Wr3 (Third level warning) --> ] <sup>(] . ])</sup> 21:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| I do not know what your previous warnings were for. ] This is your '''last warning'''. Removing legitimate warnings from your talk page is considered to be ''']'''. You ''will'' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages and your talk page will be ''protected'' from editing if you do it again. <!-- Template:Wr4 (final level warning) --> ] <sup>(] . ])</sup> 21:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | ==]== | ||
| :This article: | :This article: | ||
| Line 20: | Line 4: | ||
| :Does not explicitly accuse BD, but both BD and Lashkar, and it does not mention any modus operandii. So still vandalism I'm afraid.] 21:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | :Does not explicitly accuse BD, but both BD and Lashkar, and it does not mention any modus operandii. So still vandalism I'm afraid.] 21:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Do not remove warnings or you WILL be blocked from editing further. | Do not remove warnings or you WILL be blocked from editing further. | ||
| ::Yea, that's the article I was talking about. DOn't know how to add the link. | |||
Revision as of 22:01, 9 September 2006
Bajrang Dal
- This article:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1971372.cms
- Does not explicitly accuse BD, but both BD and Lashkar, and it does not mention any modus operandii. So still vandalism I'm afraid.Hkelkar 21:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Do not remove warnings or you WILL be blocked from editing further.
- Yea, that's the article I was talking about. DOn't know how to add the link.