| Revision as of 16:28, 15 November 2004 editFunc (talk | contribs)6,100 edits →Illicit Trade: well, it's a start....← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:37, 15 November 2004 edit undoRetiredUser2 (talk | contribs)24,119 edits restructure, expandNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| The '''United States embargo on Cuba''' is an economic, commercial and financial ] imposed on ] by the ] |
The '''United States embargo on Cuba''' (described in ] as ''el bloqueo'', ] for "the blockade") is an economic, commercial and financial ] imposed on ] by the ] on ], ]. ], the embargo is still in effect, making it one of the most enduring trade embargoes in modern history. It remains an extremely controversial issue worldwide. | ||
| ==Imposition and extension== | |||
| While the U.S. government had initially supported the ], it turned against ] when the Cuban government began implementing large-scale ] of the economy without compensating American businesses that had been expropriated. | While the U.S. government had initially supported the ], it turned against ] when the Cuban government began implementing large-scale ] of the economy without compensating American businesses that had been expropriated. | ||
| A partial embargo was imposed by ]'s government on ] ]. ] extended Eisenhower's measures, imposing a full economic embargo that took effect on ], ] as a response to Cuba's alignment with the ] during the ]. ], the embargo is still in effect, making it one of the most enduring trade embargoes in modern history. | |||
| ⚫ | The embargo has been the source of almost unanimous international criticism. Annual votes in the ] ] that call on the United States to lift its sanctions pass with exceptionally large majorities (173 to 3 in ]; 179 to 4 in ]). In the 2004 vote, only the United States, ], the ], and ] voted aganist the resolution (with ] abstaining). | ||
| The embargo was reinforced in October ] by the ] and in ] by the ]. While the United States has sought to normalize trade relations with other ]s such as the ] and ], there is a large lobby among ]s, particularly those living in ], in favor of the embargo. This makes it politically difficult for either the ] or the ] to substantially change American policy towards Cuba. | The embargo was reinforced in October ] by the ] (the "Torricelli Law") and in ] by the ] (the ]). While the United States has sought to normalize trade relations with other ]s such as the ] and ], there is a large lobby among ]s, particularly those living in ], in favor of the embargo. This makes it politically difficult for either the ] or the ] to substantially change American policy towards Cuba. | ||
| ==Recent years== | |||
| Though the leadership of the Cuban-American community is the main proponent of continuing the embargo, the policy has come to have a great effect on Cuban-American families, particularly more recent immigrants who still have family in Cuba, as they must circumvent the embargo in order to send goods to their relatives or even communicate with them. | |||
| In recent years, following the collapse of ] in the Soviet Union, Cuba has developed trading relations the rest of the world, including a substantial amount of official (as well as much unofficial) trade with the US. | |||
| In response to pressure by American farmers and agribusiness, the embargo has been relaxed in order to allow the sale of food and agricultural goods to Cuba for humanitarian reasons. This change was mandated by the ], which was passed by the ] in October ] and signed by President ]. Though Cuba initially declined to engage in such trade, seeing it as a half measure serving U.S. interests, the Castro government began to allow the purchase of food from the United States as a result of ] in November ] and has continued since then. |
In response to pressure by American farmers and agribusiness, the embargo has been relaxed in recent years in order to allow the sale of food and agricultural goods to Cuba for humanitarian reasons. This change was mandated by the ], which was passed by the ] in October ] and signed by President ]. Though Cuba initially declined to engage in such trade, seeing it as a half measure serving U.S. interests, the Castro government began to allow the purchase of food from the United States as a result of ] in November ] and has continued since then. As a result, Cuba ranked 180th (out of 180) on the list of importers of U.S. agricultural products in 2000, rising to 138th in 2001, and 45th in 2002. The country was estimated to rank 33rd on in ]. | ||
| It is estimated that each year some 80,000 Americans visit Cuba, including over 3,000 business visits. As much as $1 billion per year is remitted to Cuba by Cuban Americans. Much of this activity contravenes the spirit, if not the letter, of the embargo. | |||
| ==Effects== | |||
| The Cuban government became the recipient of large ] from the Soviet Union, peaking at around $6 billion per annum in the ], and struggled after the subsidies were removed following the collapse of communism in ]. | |||
| The Cuban government estimates that the direct economic damage caused to Cuba by the U.S. embargo since its institution exceeds $70 billion, including loss of export earnings, additional import costs, limiting the growth of the Cuban economy, and social damage. The ] the on-going annual loss to U.S. exporters at $1.2 billion. | |||
| ==Criticism== | |||
| ⚫ | The embargo has been the source of almost unanimous international criticism. Annual votes in the ] ] that call on the United States to lift its sanctions pass with exceptionally large majorities (173 to 3 in ]; 179 to 4 in ]). In the 2004 vote, only the United States, ], the ], and ] voted aganist the resolution (with ] abstaining). | ||
| == Illicit Trade == | == Illicit Trade == | ||
| Line 16: | Line 28: | ||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| ===Historical overview=== | |||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| ** ] (]) | ** ] (]) | ||
Revision as of 16:37, 15 November 2004
The United States embargo on Cuba (described in Cuba as el bloqueo, Spanish for "the blockade") is an economic, commercial and financial embargo imposed on Cuba by the United States on February 3, 1962. As of 2004, the embargo is still in effect, making it one of the most enduring trade embargoes in modern history. It remains an extremely controversial issue worldwide.
Imposition and extension
While the U.S. government had initially supported the Cuban Revolution, it turned against Fidel Castro when the Cuban government began implementing large-scale nationalization of the economy without compensating American businesses that had been expropriated.
A partial embargo was imposed by President Eisenhower's government on October 19 1960. President Kennedy extended Eisenhower's measures, imposing a full economic embargo that took effect on February 3, 1962 as a response to Cuba's alignment with the Soviet Union during the Cold War. As of 2004, the embargo is still in effect, making it one of the most enduring trade embargoes in modern history.
The embargo was reinforced in October 1992 by the Cuban Democracy Act (the "Torricelli Law") and in 1996 by the Cuban Liberty and Democracy Solidarity Act (the Helms-Burton Act). While the United States has sought to normalize trade relations with other Communist states such as the People's Republic of China and Vietnam, there is a large lobby among Cuban Americans, particularly those living in Florida, in favor of the embargo. This makes it politically difficult for either the Republican Party or the Democratic Party to substantially change American policy towards Cuba.
Recent years
In recent years, following the collapse of communism in the Soviet Union, Cuba has developed trading relations the rest of the world, including a substantial amount of official (as well as much unofficial) trade with the US.
In response to pressure by American farmers and agribusiness, the embargo has been relaxed in recent years in order to allow the sale of food and agricultural goods to Cuba for humanitarian reasons. This change was mandated by the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act, which was passed by the US Congress in October 2000 and signed by President Bill Clinton. Though Cuba initially declined to engage in such trade, seeing it as a half measure serving U.S. interests, the Castro government began to allow the purchase of food from the United States as a result of Hurricane Michelle in November 2001 and has continued since then. As a result, Cuba ranked 180th (out of 180) on the list of importers of U.S. agricultural products in 2000, rising to 138th in 2001, and 45th in 2002. The country was estimated to rank 33rd on in 2003.
It is estimated that each year some 80,000 Americans visit Cuba, including over 3,000 business visits. As much as $1 billion per year is remitted to Cuba by Cuban Americans. Much of this activity contravenes the spirit, if not the letter, of the embargo.
Effects
The Cuban government became the recipient of large subsidies from the Soviet Union, peaking at around $6 billion per annum in the 1980s, and struggled after the subsidies were removed following the collapse of communism in Russia.
The Cuban government estimates that the direct economic damage caused to Cuba by the U.S. embargo since its institution exceeds $70 billion, including loss of export earnings, additional import costs, limiting the growth of the Cuban economy, and social damage. The U.S. International Trade Commission the on-going annual loss to U.S. exporters at $1.2 billion.
Criticism
The embargo has been the source of almost unanimous international criticism. Annual votes in the United Nations General Assembly that call on the United States to lift its sanctions pass with exceptionally large majorities (173 to 3 in 2002; 179 to 4 in 2004). In the 2004 vote, only the United States, Israel, the Marshall Islands, and Palau voted aganist the resolution (with Micronesia abstaining).
Illicit Trade
Cuba produces a number of luxury items, especially cigars that are thought to be in high demand among some Americans. In popular culture, such as in novels, television shows, and motion pictures, rich and power men are often shown to have their own personal stock of illicitly obtained Cuban brandy and cigars.
See also
External links
- 2001 Report by the Cato Institute
- The Effects of the U.S. Embargo Against Cuba
- Timeline of the embargo
- Timeline of votes by the U.N. General Assembly
- U.S. embargo against Cuba fades away article on growing Cuban-American trade in food.
- What Castro wants Time letter about the cuban embargo.