Revision as of 11:32, 10 August 2016 editTusk Bilasimo (talk | contribs)24 edits →Social Media Censorship← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:46, 21 November 2016 edit undo2a02:587:410f:a900:bc5a:5b78:bb19:e344 (talk) political joke against the right and communism?Next edit → | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
I've been told that one of the main drivers of censorship and modification of language is in the idea of ]. Related would be the ideas of ], ], ], and Cognitive Universalism. Anyone else think this might be a good/bad idea? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | I've been told that one of the main drivers of censorship and modification of language is in the idea of ]. Related would be the ideas of ], ], ], and Cognitive Universalism. Anyone else think this might be a good/bad idea? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
== photo correction == | |||
please reproduce again the photo because the black tables are bigger than they should be. Only third world censorship is that random. Some censorship officers were artists so the tables were exact, not bigger neither smaller than what it was needed. Misplaced Pages isn't a political newspaper. The fact you don't like censorship officers doesn't mean that they automatically become retarded. |
Revision as of 09:46, 21 November 2016
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Censorship article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
New related category: Category:Censored media
Following up on the old discussion at Talk:Censorship/Archive_3#Censored_media_.2F_category_cleanup, I have created Category:Censored media. Please help populate. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Possible weasel words?
Part of the article says "There are many ways that censors exhibit creativity, but a specific variant is of concern in which censors rewrite texts, giving these texts secret co-authors."
Isn't 'there are many' weasel words in the same way 'many say' or 'it is commonly believed', without citation?116.93.23.41 (talk) 07:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Well, I think it's more precise, so it is probably fine. What I'd worry more is whether the claim is referenced. If it is we could check the original source. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 20:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- There's no reference mark on it, hmm. 116.93.23.41 (talk) 01:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Social Media Censorship
Hi KTJeno, the social media censorship part that you added looks good. I added a bit about why seeing disgruntled citizens' comments about certain elected officials can be good for the government who is doing the censoring, as well as provide a link to the video. You could maybe add more about why social media censorship can be viewed as good or bad to improve your section further. Kellytaft.144 (talk) 01:54, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Dogma remains our greatest enemy, and leads to censorship. War is social cannibalism. In the universe of ideas let language be explosive and guns be silent!Tusk Bilasimo (talk) 11:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Internet censorship map colours
Substantial, selective and not classified/no data are too close in colour, even if the map is blown up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.240.78.187 (talk) 07:09, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Validity and Scientific Backing?
I've been told that one of the main drivers of censorship and modification of language is in the idea of Linguistic Relativity. Related would be the ideas of Linguistic determinism, Rebranding, Prototype Theory, and Cognitive Universalism. Anyone else think this might be a good/bad idea? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.13.121.160 (talk) 03:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
photo correction
please reproduce again the photo because the black tables are bigger than they should be. Only third world censorship is that random. Some censorship officers were artists so the tables were exact, not bigger neither smaller than what it was needed. Misplaced Pages isn't a political newspaper. The fact you don't like censorship officers doesn't mean that they automatically become retarded.
Categories:- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Freedom of speech articles
- High-importance Freedom of speech articles
- C-Class Human rights articles
- Mid-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- C-Class law articles
- Top-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Media articles
- Low-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- C-Class Journalism articles
- Top-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class ethics articles
- Low-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- C-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Low-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Pornography articles
- High-importance Pornography articles
- C-Class High-importance Pornography articles
- WikiProject Pornography articles