| Revision as of 20:12, 24 November 2016 editNomoskedasticity (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,764 edits Notifying about edit warring noticeboard discussion. (TW)Tag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:50, 25 November 2016 edit undoGovindaharihari (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,872 edits →One revert: new sectionTag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 20:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC) | Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 20:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == One revert == | |||
| Hi, that article, S Bannon is at one revert only, if you make two they will apply to have you blocked, I suggest you don't get yourself blocked, it's not worth it. ] (]) 22:50, 25 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:50, 25 November 2016
There was a time when I loved the idea of Misplaced Pages. I remember thinking how cool it would be to help create a compendium of human knowledge. It even seemed like a noble and worthy pursuit. That is the dream that was envisioned by the founders of Misplaced Pages.
But what I have learned from my experience here is that Misplaced Pages is a fool's game. That is because every liar with an agenda and every fool with a computer has the same vote. And with that vote, they can erase in a day, what took you a week to complete.
For this reason, I would strongly encourage people to stop wasting their time with Misplaced Pages.
- ICarriere
November 2016
Your recent editing history at Steve Bannon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:04, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- This article is subject to 1RR -- see the edit notice when you click on "edit". Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. If you have questions, please contact me.- MrX 19:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Template:Z33 - MrX 19:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:ICarriere reported by User:Nomoskedasticity (Result: ). Thank you. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
One revert
Hi, that article, S Bannon is at one revert only, if you make two they will apply to have you blocked, I suggest you don't get yourself blocked, it's not worth it. Govindaharihari (talk) 22:50, 25 November 2016 (UTC)