Misplaced Pages

talk:Lists in Misplaced Pages: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:20, 9 September 2006 editJossi (talk | contribs)72,880 edits Current essay← Previous edit Revision as of 19:59, 11 September 2006 edit undoLulu of the Lotus-Eaters (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,790 edits unanimous keepNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


= New stuff = = New stuff =

== Rejected MfD ==
This essay was nominated for deletion at ]. The votes were unanimously "Keep", and the nominator withdrew the nomination on 2006-09-11.


== Current essay == == Current essay ==

Revision as of 19:59, 11 September 2006

Archives

New stuff

Rejected MfD

This essay was nominated for deletion at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Lists in Misplaced Pages. The votes were unanimously "Keep", and the nominator withdrew the nomination on 2006-09-11.

Current essay

An editor removed the essay flag with the incorrect comment that it was a failed guideline. That is simply incorrect. Although this essay had been considered as a guideline earlier, its creators decided it would work better as an essay... and that's what it is. If there is any language in it remaining that is too suggestive of its prior origin, change a few words, but the essay remains useful. LotLE×talk 15:07, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

As an essay, is a good one and should remain. ≈ jossi ≈ t@ 19:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)