| Revision as of 09:27, 13 September 2006 editVernon39 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers16,288 edits query on reversion of JG Bennett← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:34, 13 September 2006 edit undoJohn254 (talk | contribs)42,562 editsm reverting trolling by misplaced criticism by Vernon39 to last version by Tony SidawayNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| This doesn't make sense to me. Speedy deletion is performed hundreds of times every day. --] 02:15, 13 September 2006 (UTC) | This doesn't make sense to me. Speedy deletion is performed hundreds of times every day. --] 02:15, 13 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==] page== | |||
| Don't know why you regard my correction o "Woolrich" to "Woolwich" as vandalism! | |||
| <P> | |||
| Vernon White 09:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <P> | |||
| ____ | |||
Revision as of 14:34, 13 September 2006
Archives Note: The links below are permanent links to the correct versions of the archived talk pages. Any "newer" versions of these pages may have been compromised. |
|---|
| 1 2 3 |
Richardson
Hey John254 -- thanks for quickly reverting the recent vandalism on the Richardson, Texas page. Much appreciated... --nathanbeach 22:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Your edit to Misplaced Pages:Process is Important
You added: However, some editors give a narrow construction to Ignore all rules, and claim that process should be adhered to unless there is a compelling justification for ignoring all rules. It is said that the repeated deletion and undeletion of this essay which began with a speedy deletion demonstrates the need to follow appropriate processes in most cases.
This doesn't make sense to me. Speedy deletion is performed hundreds of times every day. --Tony Sidaway 02:15, 13 September 2006 (UTC)