| Revision as of 17:43, 13 September 2006 editRobdurbar (talk | contribs)11,477 edits cos fifa say so← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:43, 13 September 2006 edit undoRobdurbar (talk | contribs)11,477 edits aignNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| How can ] claim to be the successor team ? They make up less than a third of the territory this team represented. It is a bit like ] claiming to be the successor of the ]. ] --] 16:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC) | How can ] claim to be the successor team ? They make up less than a third of the territory this team represented. It is a bit like ] claiming to be the successor of the ]. ] --] 16:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Not quite. The team is controlled by the ]. And, most importantly, they are recognsied as such by ] | :Not quite. The team is controlled by the ]. And, most importantly, they are recognsied as such by ] --] 17:43, 13 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:43, 13 September 2006
How can Northern Ireland claim to be the successor team ? They make up less than a third of the territory this team represented. It is a bit like Ukraine claiming to be the successor of the USSR. Djln --Djln 16:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Not quite. The team is controlled by the same football association. And, most importantly, they are recognsied as such by FIFA --Robdurbar 17:43, 13 September 2006 (UTC)