| Revision as of 12:21, 30 December 2016 editIpigott (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers271,015 edits WiR January← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:03, 31 December 2016 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,296,622 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's Health/Archive 1) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{Auto archiving notice|age=2 |units=months |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} | {{Auto archiving notice|age=2 |units=months |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} | ||
| == Status of project == | |||
| Although I listed my name here as being interested in the project, and had contributed some articles in the past, I was unclear as to how active this project was. There are relatively few members and not much discussion. Some of you have been contacted by a researcher interested in studying the project and its members. This stimulated me to take a closer look at how the project was organised. The scope of the topic is vast, and it was difficult to grasp how many articles were out there and what they covered because many that I found were not placed in the Women's health category. I added it to a number. I also created a new subcategory, ]. | |||
| It occurred to me that one way of trying to bring more focus was to look at having a flagship article that would then radiate out to all the many topics that should be included. Unfortunately when I looked at ] on July 4th, it was in pretty bad shape - see {{oldid2|722512935|"Women's health" as of 28 May 2016}} | |||
| I have done a major rewrite to encompass some of the main issues of the topic, but obviously it just scratches the surface. In the mean time I put it up for GA review - please feel free to contribute. Obviously an article like this should be writen at a high standard. Another related topic would be to create a template that would act as a navbox. --] (]) 15:41, 28 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you so much for your work in this area. I am quite baffled myself regarding the relative inactivity of the project. Do you have a sample of what a Women's health navbox would look like? Best Regards, | |||
| :] (]) 19:55, 4 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks! Finally figured out who you are, given your 3 personae! Well there are plenty of samples around on other topics, for instance there is one on reproductive health at the bottom of the page, which would be replaced but included as a link within the more inclusive navbox. The first step is to decide on the scope of the article and project, and draw up a list of what pages should be included - and by implications any topics so far not tackled on WP which should be. The next would be to create an appropriate hierarchy.--] (]) 14:25, 5 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::OK. Started working on navbox --] (]) 11:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::: First draft of template added to ], and can now be added to related pages. Down the road a vertical navbox can be created . --] (]) 12:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Sidebar in progress --] (]) 16:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::::: ] is now in place and can be used on key articles on women's health --] (]) 14:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Women's health == | == Women's health == | ||
Revision as of 05:03, 31 December 2016
 | Women's Health Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | Women Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Women's Health and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months  |
Women's health
Women's health has now been rated GA and could probably be tweaked to FA. I have provided this article in the hope that this can be considered a flagship article to unify the other pages on this project and a potential model to follow. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 17:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- The article is mentioned in the Did You Know? section of Misplaced Pages's home page today. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 14:37, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages
Greetings WikiProject Women's Health Members!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.
Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 18:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Know much about the history of our understanding of the placenta?
Hi! I picked a women scientist at random off the women in science worklist and have started an article on Elizabeth M. Ramsey, who, with Martin Denner, greatly increased the understanding of the placental circulatory system. If someone here could better describe her work, it would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! Chris vLS (talk) 02:00, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
You have got to be kidding me - cardiac arrest in men vs women
FYI Talk:Cardiac_arrest#You_have_got_to_be_kidding_me_-_cardiac_arrest_in_men_vs_women. Ottawahitech (talk) 08:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)please ping me
January 2017 at Women in Red
_Anna_lehrt_Maria_das_Lesen.jpg) 
| |
|---|---|
|
Women Philosophers & Women in Education online editathons  | |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 12:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Categories: