Misplaced Pages

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:56, 15 September 2006 view sourceVioletriga (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users37,361 edits image and ISBN← Previous edit Revision as of 16:15, 15 September 2006 view source Holly Cheng (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators116,583 editsm replace image with FP versionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
] ]
'''Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo''' is a ] ] used as an example of how ]s can be used to create complicated constructs. It featured in ]'s 1994 book '']'',<ref name="Pinker">]. 1994. '']'' p210. ISBN 0060958332.</ref> but is known to have been around before February 1992 when it was posted to ] by William J. Rapaport.<ref name="Linguistlist">Rapaport, William J. ] ]. "". Accessed ] ].</ref> '''Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo''' is a ] ] used as an example of how ]s can be used to create complicated constructs. It featured in ]'s 1994 book '']'',<ref name="Pinker">]. 1994. '']'' p210. ISBN 0060958332.</ref> but is known to have been around before February 1992 when it was posted to ] by William J. Rapaport.<ref name="Linguistlist">Rapaport, William J. ] ]. "". Accessed ] ].</ref>


Revision as of 16:15, 15 September 2006

The word buffalo may refer to an animal but has other meanings as well.

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo is a grammatically valid sentence used as an example of how homophones can be used to create complicated constructs. It featured in Steven Pinker's 1994 book The Language Instinct, but is known to have been around before February 1992 when it was posted to Linguist List by William J. Rapaport.

Sentence construction

The sentence uses three possible meanings of the word "buffalo":

  1. An American Bison, water buffalo, white buffalo, or African buffalo
  2. Buffalo, New York, the second-largest city in the state of New York
  3. A verb meaning to confuse, deceive, or intimidate

Using these definitions, the sentence could be rewritten:

Buffalo bison Buffalo bison intimidate intimidate Buffalo bison.

This only leaves "Buffalo" referring to the city.

Parsing difficulties

Other than the obvious confusion caused by the homophones, the sentence is difficult to parse for several reasons:

  1. The use of "buffalo" as a verb is not particularly common
  2. The removal of syntactically significant words ("the", "that", etc.) to such a degree is not a common linguistic approach
  3. The omission of punctuation makes it difficult to read the flow of the sentence
  4. The length of the sentence reaches the limitations of human ability to parse structure and meaning

References

  1. Pinker, Steven. 1994. The Language Instinct p210. ISBN 0060958332.
  2. Rapaport, William J. 19 February 1992. "Message 1: Re: 3.154 Parsing Challenges". Accessed 14 September 2006.

External links

Category: