Misplaced Pages

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:33, 15 September 2006 view sourceAltenmann (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers217,176 edits →Sentence construction: not so simple← Previous edit Revision as of 22:35, 15 September 2006 view source Altenmann (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers217,176 edits →Sentence constructionNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
#The ] form of "buffalo" (the fact that enables the omission of articles) #The ] form of "buffalo" (the fact that enables the omission of articles)


Keeping in mind these definitions, the sentence turns into the description of the ] of the ] in the ] of buffalo from the Buffalo zoo: Keeping in mind these definitions, the sentence turns into the description of the ] in the ] of buffalo from the Buffalo zoo:
: buffalo from Buffalo buffalo from Buffalo intimidate intimidate buffalo from Buffalo. : buffalo from Buffalo buffalo from Buffalo intimidate intimidate buffalo from Buffalo.


Revision as of 22:35, 15 September 2006

The word buffalo may refer to an animal but has other meanings as well.

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo is a grammatically valid sentence used as an example of how homophones can be used to create complicated constructs. It featured in Steven Pinker's 1994 book The Language Instinct, but is known to have been around before February 1992 when it was posted to Linguist List by William J. Rapaport.

Sentences of this type, although not in such a refined form, have been known for a long time. A classical example is a proverb "Don't trouble trouble until trouble troubles you".


Sentence construction

The sentence uses four possible readings of the word "buffalo":

  1. An American Bison, white buffalo, or African buffalo
  2. Buffalo, New York, the second-largest city in the state of New York
  3. A verb meaning to confuse, deceive, or intimidate
  4. The plural form of "buffalo" (the fact that enables the omission of articles)

Keeping in mind these definitions, the sentence turns into the description of the pecking order in the social hierarchy of buffalo from the Buffalo zoo:

buffalo from Buffalo buffalo from Buffalo intimidate intimidate buffalo from Buffalo.

Other than the obvious confusion caused by the homophones, the sentence is difficult to parse for several reasons:

  1. The use of "buffalo" as a verb is not particularly common
  2. The removal of syntactically significant words ("the", "that", etc.) to such a degree is not a common linguistic approach
  3. The omission of punctuation makes it difficult to read the flow of the sentence
  4. The example has the structure of a garden path sentence, i.e., the sentence that cannot be parsed by reading one word at a time without backtracking.
  5. The length of the sentence reaches the limitations of human ability to parse structure and meaning

Similar examples

  • A joke, in which a conductor, when asked how long will the train stay at the station, answered "From two to two to two two".
  • "If the sentence that had had had had had had, it would have been correct."

References

  1. Pinker, Steven. 1994. The Language Instinct p210. ISBN 0060958332.
  2. Rapaport, William J. 19 February 1992. "Message 1: Re: 3.154 Parsing Challenges". Accessed 14 September 2006.

External links

Category: