Misplaced Pages

Talk:Richard Lynn: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:06, 13 October 2016 editAutodidact1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,151 editsm Not an "average," but a "range"← Previous edit Revision as of 14:56, 14 January 2017 edit undoBeyond My Ken (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers263,279 edits Fair warning: new sectionNext edit →
Line 66: Line 66:
*{{cite journal|first=Barry|last=Mehler|title=Foundation for fascism: The new eugenics movement in the United States|journal=Patterns of Prejudice|volume=23|issue=4|year=1989}} *{{cite journal|first=Barry|last=Mehler|title=Foundation for fascism: The new eugenics movement in the United States|journal=Patterns of Prejudice|volume=23|issue=4|year=1989}}
*{{cite journal|title=The Bell Curve: Another Chapter in the Continuing Political Economy of Racism|first1=Robert G.|last1=Newby|first2=Diane E.|last2=Newby|journal=American Behavioral Scientist|year=1995|volume=39|issue=1|pages=12–24|doi=10.1177/0002764295039001003}} *{{cite journal|title=The Bell Curve: Another Chapter in the Continuing Political Economy of Racism|first1=Robert G.|last1=Newby|first2=Diane E.|last2=Newby|journal=American Behavioral Scientist|year=1995|volume=39|issue=1|pages=12–24|doi=10.1177/0002764295039001003}}

== Fair warning ==

Editors of this article are given fair warning that ] is a creationist who was site-banned by ArbCom due to his editing in the "race & intelligence" topic area, bur has been inexplicably released from his site ban by the Committee after an appeal. It has been suggested on that Occam may be interested in "correcting" this article, however, despite he un-site-banning, he ramains undere a topic band for the "race & inelligence" topic area, broadly construced, and any editingt on his part of this article would therefore be a violation of his sanctions and should be reported to Arb Com. Captain Occam is a POV warrior whoae editing must be closely monitored at all times, in all contexts, for bias. for bias. ] (]) 14:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:56, 14 January 2017

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiography: Science and Academia
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPsychology Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUnited Kingdom Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list for Richard Lynn: edit·history·watch·refresh· Updated 2024-06-20


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
  • Cleanup : *Tidy up the raw external link referencing
  • Expand : *Need more 'biographical' information (aside from his work, that is); cite for date of leaving editorial board of the journal Personality and Individual Differences
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.
Arbitration Ruling on Race and Intelligence

The article Richard Lynn, along with other articles relating to the area of conflict (namely, the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, broadly construed), is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, described in a 2010 Arbitration Committee case where the articulated principles included:

  • Pillars: Misplaced Pages articles must be neutral, verifiable and must not contain original research. Those founding principles (the Pillars) are not negotiable and cannot be overruled, even when apparent consensus to do so exists.
  • Original research: Misplaced Pages defines "original research" as "facts, allegations, ideas, and stories not already published by reliable sources". In particular, analyses or conclusions not already published in reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy are not appropriate for inclusion in articles.
  • Correct use of sources: Misplaced Pages articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources. Primary sources are permitted if used carefully. All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than to original analysis of the primary-source material by Misplaced Pages editors.
  • Advocacy: Misplaced Pages strives towards a neutral point of view. Accordingly, it is not the appropriate venue for advocacy or for advancing a specific point of view. While coverage of all significant points of view is a necessary part of balancing an article, striving to give exposure to minority viewpoints that are not significantly expressed in reliable secondary sources is not.
  • Single purpose accounts: Single purpose accounts are expected to contribute neutrally instead of following their own agenda and, in particular, should take care to avoid creating the impression that their focus on one topic is non-neutral, which could strongly suggest that their editing is not compatible with the goals of this project.
  • Decorum: Misplaced Pages users are expected to behave reasonably, calmly, and courteously in their interactions with other users; to approach even difficult situations in a dignified fashion and with a constructive and collaborative outlook; and to avoid acting in a manner that brings the project into disrepute. Unseemly conduct, such as personal attacks, incivility, assumptions of bad faith, harassment, or disruptive point-making, is prohibited.
  • Tag-team editing: Tag teams work in unison to push a particular point of view. Tag-team editing – to thwart core policies (neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research); or to evade procedural restrictions such as the three revert rule or to violate behavioural norms by edit warring; or to attempt to exert ownership over articles; or otherwise to prevent consensus prevailing – is prohibited.

If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. You may also wish to review the full arbitration case page. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first.

The contents of the Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations page were merged into Richard Lynn on 2008-07-13. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.


Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5


This page has archives. Sections older than 200 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

A source important for editing this article.

http://www.iapsych.com/iqmr/fe/LinkedDocuments/wicherts2010d.pdf

"Raven's test performance of sub-Saharan Africans: Average performance, psychometric properties, and the Flynn Effect"

Not an "average," but a "range"

In this sentence, "Ashkenazi Jews average 107–115 in the US and Britain due to their better performance in verbal and reasoning tests even though they performed lower in visual and spatial ability tests, but those in Israel average lower", "average" is a misnomer: the average is "111." Or correct to read, "Ashkenazi Jews average 107 and 115 in the US and Britain, respectively, due to their better performance in verbal and reasoning tests even though they performed lower in visual and spatial ability tests, but those in Israel average lower." if that is what you are saying. (From "Race and national differences in intelligence".) Autodidact1 (talk) 04:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Incomplete sentence

Please complete this sentence: "He also believes that socioeconomic status." (From "Dysgenics and eugenics".) Autodidact1 (talk) 05:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Book review to cite here

Intelligence Volume 35, Issue 1, January-February 2007, Pages 94-96 doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.08.001 Book review Race differences in intelligence: An evolutionary hypothesis. N.J. Mackintosh

Lynn also wrote a 1979 paper finding that Irish children had an average IQ of 93, which he attributed to Irish kids learning the Irish language which he suggested lowered their English verbal/language scores. For those who don't know, Lynn is a Unionist (protestant) at the University of Ulster, in a notoriously Unionist and anti-Catholic town, Colraine. So, he's from a community culturally hostile to (Catholic) Irish/Gaelic culture. Catholic schools in Northern Ireland teach Irish. Protestant schools don't. Funny how Lynn finds cultural reasons for Irish to have a low IQ, but genetic reasons for racial differences in IQ. - Anonymous Poster.

Further reading

Collection of sources

  • Sussman, Robert Wald (2014). The Myth of Race: The Troubling Persistence of an Unscientific Idea. Harvard University Press. p. 272. Just as Grant and many other earlier eugenicists were, Lynn is xenophobic and fears human variety, change and multiculturalism; this cultural heritage has colored his worldview for forty years. Lynn is the perfect Pioneer fund grant recipient and leader. He does very little science, and the ´science´ he does is extremely poor. However, he is extremely prolific and spreads racist themes backed by a false an ill-begotten reputation of academic respectability.
  • Eric Alterman (2003). What Liberal Media. Basic Books. (quotes Kamin's description of Lynn, and critiques his relations to MQ and Pioneer, p. 101)
  • Gross, Richard (2014). Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour 7th Edition. (Under the heading "the political and racist nature of IQ tests" quotes Sweet 2004 saying "Go to the website of Richard Lynn"..."and you will find reams of racist pseudoscience".)
  • Celia Roberts (2007). Messengers of Sex: Hormones, Biomedicine and Feminism. Cambridge University Press. p. 134. Thus Lynn enlists hormones to reproduce the well-worn racist argument that blac men are lower forms of life than white men, while simultaneously positioning Asian men as less masculine than white men.
  • Hugh Coolican (2014). Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology. Psychology Press. p. 281. (gives the relation between Lynn, MQ and the pioneer fund as an example of ethically problematic research practices, cautioning the reader to consider not publishing in venues that are connected to Lynn or the Pioneer fund)
  • Wilson, Carter A. (1996). Racism: From Slavery to Advanced Capitalism. SAGE. p. 229. At best Lynn's approach is racial propaganda or biased research driven by a strong prejudice against blacks and a strong need to believe in their genetic inferiority. At worst, Lynn's research arises out of a malicious and dishonest effort to demonstrate the genetic inferiority of blacks
  • Kamin, Leon. "Behind the Bell Curve" (PDF). Scientific American: 100. Lynn's distortions and misrepresentations of the data constitute a truly venomous racism, combined with the scandalous disregard for scientific objectivity
  • Valone, David A. (2002). "Richard Lynn: Eugenics: A Reassessment, review". Isis. 93 (3): 534. doi:10.1086/374143.
  • Barnett, Susan M.; Williams, Wendy (2004). "National Intelligence and The Emperor's New Clothes". PsycCRITIQUES. 49 (4): 389–396. doi:10.1037/004367. Among this book's strengths are that it argues for a point of view unpopular within the scientific community, it relies on hard data to make its points, its organization and clarity. Also, the book is expansive in its thinking and argumentation. All of these strengths considered, however, we believe that the arguments advanced in the book are flawed by an omnipresent logical fallacy and confusion of correlation with causation that undermines the foundation of the book.
  • Valencia, Richard R. (2010). Dismantling Contemporary Deficit Thinking: Educational Thought and Practice. Routledge. pp. 56=61.
  • Richards, Graham (2004). Race, Racism and Psychology: Towards a Reflexive History. Routledge. p. 280.
  • Ferber, Abby L. (2012). Home-Grown Hate: Gender and Organized Racism. Routledge.
  • Neisser, Ulric (2004). "Serious Scientists or Disgusting Racists?". PsycCRITIQUES. 49 (1): 5–7. doi:10.1037/004224.
  • Gelb, Steven A. (1997). Heart of Darkness: The Discreet Charm of the Hereditarian Psychologist. Vol. 19. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
  • Kenny, M. G. (2002). "Toward a racial abyss: Eugenics, Wickliffe Draper, and the origins of The Pioneer Fund". J. Hist. Behav. Sci. 38: 259–283. doi:10.1002/jhbs.10063.
  • Mehler, Barry (1989). "Foundation for fascism: The new eugenics movement in the United States". Patterns of Prejudice. 23 (4).
  • Newby, Robert G.; Newby, Diane E. (1995). "The Bell Curve: Another Chapter in the Continuing Political Economy of Racism". American Behavioral Scientist. 39 (1): 12–24. doi:10.1177/0002764295039001003.

Fair warning

Editors of this article are given fair warning that User:Captain Occam is a creationist who was site-banned by ArbCom due to his editing in the "race & intelligence" topic area, bur has been inexplicably released from his site ban by the Committee after an appeal. It has been suggested on this thread that Occam may be interested in "correcting" this article, however, despite he un-site-banning, he ramains undere a topic band for the "race & inelligence" topic area, broadly construced, and any editingt on his part of this article would therefore be a violation of his sanctions and should be reported to Arb Com. Captain Occam is a POV warrior whoae editing must be closely monitored at all times, in all contexts, for bias. for bias. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Categories: