Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/Society, law, and sex: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:04, 14 September 2006 editSzyslak (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,163 edits withdrew Talk:University of California, Riverside - dispute has been inactive for almost a month← Previous edit Revision as of 16:47, 16 September 2006 edit undoGinkgo100 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,243 edits added police brutalityNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{RFCheader|Society, law, and sex}} {{RFCheader|Society, law, and sex}}
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>-->
*] Needs input desperately. Help getting consensus is needed, especially as there has now been an accusation of "vandalism" for good faith work on this article. 16:47, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
*] An extremely messy edit war conducted by three users. As I don't have the slightest idea whose version is correct, I've opened up this RfC. 16:26, 11 September 2006 (UTC) *] An extremely messy edit war conducted by three users. As I don't have the slightest idea whose version is correct, I've opened up this RfC. 16:26, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
*] (Hall of Shame no a Reliable Source, per wp:External_links) I reviewed a web link that had appeared in numerous sexuality links. I removed it based on wp:external links on the grounds that 1) ] added the link, and the web site is an activist opinion site written by ]. Although the topic is important, she advocated her own web site as part of her activism. (Wp:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided, #3). 2) My review of the web site showed that is was an opinion and POV web site, substantially made up of Ms. Craft's anecdotal experience, and had factually innacurate material and unverified personal research. As I said, the subject matter is important, and she is heartfelt about her opinions, but they are just that. Several other users, because of the serious topic, objected to it's deletion and have reinstated it. On the talk page (above) we agreed to ask for other input, or admin input for resolution. I ask here for that, rather than asking one of my favorite admins, because we desire an objective opinion. 22:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC) *] (Hall of Shame no a Reliable Source, per wp:External_links) I reviewed a web link that had appeared in numerous sexuality links. I removed it based on wp:external links on the grounds that 1) ] added the link, and the web site is an activist opinion site written by ]. Although the topic is important, she advocated her own web site as part of her activism. (Wp:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided, #3). 2) My review of the web site showed that is was an opinion and POV web site, substantially made up of Ms. Craft's anecdotal experience, and had factually innacurate material and unverified personal research. As I said, the subject matter is important, and she is heartfelt about her opinions, but they are just that. Several other users, because of the serious topic, objected to it's deletion and have reinstated it. On the talk page (above) we agreed to ask for other input, or admin input for resolution. I ask here for that, rather than asking one of my favorite admins, because we desire an objective opinion. 22:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:47, 16 September 2006

Shortcut
  • ]

Template:RFCheader

  • Talk:Police_brutality#Request_for_Comment Needs input desperately. Help getting consensus is needed, especially as there has now been an accusation of "vandalism" for good faith work on this article. 16:47, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Alpha Phi Alpha#Stop this edit war An extremely messy edit war conducted by three users. As I don't have the slightest idea whose version is correct, I've opened up this RfC. 16:26, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Criticism_of_the_clothes_free_movement (Hall of Shame no a Reliable Source, per wp:External_links) I reviewed a web link that had appeared in numerous sexuality links. I removed it based on wp:external links on the grounds that 1) user:nikkicraft added the link, and the web site is an activist opinion site written by user:nikkicraft. Although the topic is important, she advocated her own web site as part of her activism. (Wp:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided, #3). 2) My review of the web site showed that is was an opinion and POV web site, substantially made up of Ms. Craft's anecdotal experience, and had factually innacurate material and unverified personal research. As I said, the subject matter is important, and she is heartfelt about her opinions, but they are just that. Several other users, because of the serious topic, objected to it's deletion and have reinstated it. On the talk page (above) we agreed to ask for other input, or admin input for resolution. I ask here for that, rather than asking one of my favorite admins, because we desire an objective opinion. 22:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Sons of Confederate Veterans#NPOV problems is the article Sons of Confederate Veterans written from a neutral point of view? 17:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Advocates_for_Children_in_Therapy#RFC over deleting and abuse of admin status 17:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Category talk:Chinese universities – over the scope of the category. 20:46, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Lion: Lion same-sex relations - Should zoological studies discussing frequent homosexual interactions among male and female lion pairs be included in the article? Should the person contributing the material be charged with finding opposing viewpoints? 04:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Template talk:Police by country – Should the links to the police articles of Hong Kong and Macao be included in brackets after the one of the People's Republic of China, or in the same way as other countries. 21:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Argentine National Gendarmerie - Disagreement about whether an article on an Argentine organisation should give preference to the Spanish terms with English terms added after, or whether preference should go to the English terms, with Spanish terms added after. Also whether a translation is legitimate if it appears in no Spanish-English dictionary, rather than a translation which appears in Spanish-English dictionaries. 21:53, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:YouTube#Request_for_Comment:_Section_with_information_on_how_to_download_videos_from_YouTube - A dispute over if there should be information included on the main page about how to download videos from YouTube, or at least reference sites that allow this, or if that constitutes a 'How-To'/copyright/legal violation --16:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Kenny Dalglish#2004 Rooney Court Case - a dispute over the notability of a court case involving Kenny Dalglish. Does it merit inclusion in the lead section or not? Was Dalglish's involvement proven, alleged, or anything in-between? 01:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:English people. Dispute on whether Bretons, Danes, Dutch and Frisians should be added to the list of related people. 20:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)