Revision as of 05:03, 31 December 2016 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,823 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's Health/Archive 1) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:33, 19 January 2017 edit undoEvolution and evolvability (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,410 edits →v:WikiJournal of Medicine| promotion: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<small>(To subscribe, ]. Unsubscribe, ])</small> --] (]) 12:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC) | <small>(To subscribe, ]. Unsubscribe, ])</small> --] (]) 12:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
== '']'' promotion == | |||
{{WJM advert 2017 Jan}}<br> | |||
]<sup>]</sup> 10:33, 19 January 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:33, 19 January 2017
Women's Health Project‑class | |||||||
|
Women Project‑class | |||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Women's Health and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
Women's health
Women's health has now been rated GA and could probably be tweaked to FA. I have provided this article in the hope that this can be considered a flagship article to unify the other pages on this project and a potential model to follow. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 17:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- The article is mentioned in the Did You Know? section of Misplaced Pages's home page today. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 14:37, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages
Greetings WikiProject Women's Health Members!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.
Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 18:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Know much about the history of our understanding of the placenta?
Hi! I picked a women scientist at random off the women in science worklist and have started an article on Elizabeth M. Ramsey, who, with Martin Denner, greatly increased the understanding of the placental circulatory system. If someone here could better describe her work, it would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! Chris vLS (talk) 02:00, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
You have got to be kidding me - cardiac arrest in men vs women
FYI Talk:Cardiac_arrest#You_have_got_to_be_kidding_me_-_cardiac_arrest_in_men_vs_women. Ottawahitech (talk) 08:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)please ping me
January 2017 at Women in Red
| |
---|---|
Women Philosophers & Women in Education online editathons |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 12:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
WikiJournal of Medicine promotion
The WikiJournal of Medicine is a free, peer reviewed academic journal which aims to provide a new mechanism for ensuring the accuracy of Misplaced Pages's biomedical content. We started it as a way of bridging the Misplaced Pages-academia gap. It is also part of a WikiJournal User Group with other WikiJournals under development. The journal is still starting out and not yet well known, so we are advertising ourselves to WikiProjects that might be interested. |
Engaging Wikipedians
- Original articles on topics that don't yet have a Misplaced Pages page, or only a stub/start
- Misplaced Pages articles that you are willing to see through external peer review (either solo or as in a group, process analogous to GA / FA review)
- Image articles, based around an important medical image or summary diagram
Engaging non-Wikipedians
We hope that an academic journal format may also encourage non-Wikipedians to contribute who would otherwise not. Therefore, please consider:
- Printing off the advertisement poster and distribute in tearooms & noticeboards at your place of work
- Emailing around the pdf through contact networks or mailing lists (suggested wording)
If you want to know more, we recently published an editorial describing how the journal developed. Alternatively, check out the journal's About or Discussion pages.
- Masukume, G; Kipersztok, L; Das, D; Shafee, T; Laurent, M; Heilman, J (November 2016). "Medical journals and Misplaced Pages: a global health matter". The Lancet Global Health. 4 (11): e791. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30254-6. PMID 27765289.
- "Wikiversity Journal: A new user group". The Signpost. 2016-06-15.
- Shafee, T; Das, D; Masukume, G; Häggström, M (2017). "WikiJournal of Medicine, the first Misplaced Pages-integrated academic journal". WikiJournal of Medicine. 4. doi:10.15347/wjm/2017.001.
Additionally, the WikiJournal of Science is just starting up under a similar model and looking for contributors. Firstly it is seeking editors to guide submissions through external academic peer review and format accepted articles. It is also encouraging submission of articles in the same format as Wiki.J.Med. If you're interested, please come and discuss the project on the journal's talk page, or the general discussion page for the WikiJournal User group.
T.Shafee(Evo&Evo) 10:33, 19 January 2017 (UTC)