Misplaced Pages

User talk:Freestylefrappe: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:11, 12 September 2006 view sourceBDD (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators111,922 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 04:12, 17 September 2006 view source Freestylefrappe (talk | contribs)4,471 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
==Administrative abuse, policy violations, and vandalism==
==Archive==
The following is an ongoing list of users who have either violated policy, abused their administrative power, or just outright vandalized Misplaced Pages in the ] incident.
*


===Bunchograpes===
=New comments=
*User:]
**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74667014&oldid=74665751
***Type of policy violation: Though I was incivil, I never made personal attacks as Bunchographes falsely accuses me of doing here; encouragement of unjustified talkpage protection


===Joseph Solis in Australia===
==Qiyamah==
*User: ]
If you cannot edit responsibly, don't edit at all. I asked users to rv the honorific and explain to the anonymous user why the reversion was necessary. Instead, you left the anon with no message, much less a welcome. That's unacceptable. ] 22:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=LX_Legislature_of_the_Mexican_Congress&diff=74685940&oldid=74060753
***Type of policy violation: Unsourced alteration of date


**Page:]
:* (cur) (last) 05:16, September 11, 2006 ] (Talk | Contribs | Block) (→Overview - rm honorific. Please see ])
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=73727819&oldid=73707740
:* (cur) (last) 05:19, September 9, 2006 ] (Talk | Block)
***Type of vandalism: Addition of numerous unsourced and highly pov statements ridiculing several politicians after WP:BLP was enforced.


**Page:]
:What are the chances the editor at that anonymous IP would still be around 48 hours after their first minor edit ever? I would have only left a message if I was sure the editor had or was returning. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 01:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=74865328&oldid=74825583
***Type of policy violation: ] - Amazingly after CBD protected and reverted the page and insisted that ] and ] were going to be enforced, JSA restored the page to the version prior to my editing.


===Green caterpillar===
==Calderon==
*User: ]
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060905/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/mexico_elections
**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AVicente_Fox&diff=74594271&oldid=74575481
***Type of policy violation: ], though it is a harmless prank - one that should have been reverted


===Hseldon10===
Did you seriously need a source to point out Calderon's party? Not every single statement on Misplaced Pages needs a source directly cited. Do you think it's necessary to do so to prove George W. Bush's party affiliation? --] 11:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
*User:]
**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AVicente_Fox&diff=74451119&oldid=74449011
***Type of policy violation: ], ], ]

**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AVicente_Fox&diff=74677007&oldid=74662240
***Type of policy violation: ], ], ], ]

**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AVicente_Fox&diff=74575481&oldid=74571624
***Type of policy violation: ], ]

**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3A208.180.242.96&diff=74678830&oldid=74678249
***Type of policy violation: ], ], ], false accusation of vandalism

===Chacor===
*User: ]
**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AVicente_Fox&diff=74718567&oldid=74718143
***Type of policy violation: ]

**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AVicente_Fox&diff=74635326&oldid=74594271
***Type of policy violation: ], ], ]

**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AVicente_Fox&diff=74520702&oldid=74463876
***Type of policy violation: ], ], ], deliberately misinterpreting ], ], and ]

**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=74651397&oldid=74642738
***Type of policy violation: ]. Look at the diff. Look at the edit summary... and no one blocked him... or even warned him...

**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74640915&oldid=74640882
***Type of policy violation: False accusations of sockpuppetry. The sockpuppet in question was clearly a strawman sockpuppet used by Chacor.

**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74650332&oldid=74650183
***Type of policy violation: ] - an attempt to coverup his past policy violations

**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74652718&oldid=74652058
***Type of policy violation: Encourages attempts to silence me by calling for a completely unjustified protection of my talkpage

**Page:]
***Diff:http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74667644&oldid=74667583
***Type of policy violation: ], ], ]

===Captainktainer===
*User: ]
**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AVicente_Fox&diff=74698256&oldid=74677007
***Type of policy violation: Instructs editors to ignore vandalism and policy violations

===Pgk===
*User: ]
**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AVicente_Fox&diff=74569702&oldid=74569364
***Type of policy violation: ], knowingly misinterpreting ]

**Page: ]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3ARequests_for_checkuser%2FCase%2FYa_ya_ya_ya_ya_ya&diff=74865659&oldid=74745603
***Type of policy violation: Lying about me “admitting” I was using sockpuppets; falsely calling Mackensen’s vandalism on the same page a "timing issue"

===Centrx===
*]
**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User%3AYa_ya_ya_ya_ya_ya&diff=74792530&oldid=73355141
***Type of policy violation: ], lying about my account being a sockpuppet with the false edit summary: "Proven Sockpuppet blocked"

**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3AYa_ya_ya_ya_ya_ya&diff=74801149&oldid=74800937
***Type of policy violation: False accusation of ] violation; in an effort to silence me, Centrx protected my talkpage with no justification and the untruthful edit summary "Abuse of helpme and attacks."

**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3AYa_ya_ya_ya_ya_ya&diff=74801237&oldid=74801149
***Type of policy violation: ], in an effort to coverup the evidence I had presented proving the guilt of the other parties involved, Centrx reverts all my evidence.

===TenOfAllTrades===
*]
**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3AYa_ya_ya_ya_ya_ya&diff=74815048&oldid=74801237
***Type of policy violation: False accusations of sockpuppetry, false accusations of historical block evasion, unjustified indefinite block of account after Mike Halterman attempted and was berated for the same thing

**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3ARequests_for_arbitration&diff=74824829&oldid=74824722
*** Type of policy violation: False accusations of sockpuppetry, false accusations of block evasion, false suggestion in his edit summary of "Explanation of block: extensive use of sockpuppets"

===Mindspillage===
*User:]
**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3ARequests_for_arbitration&diff=74824829&oldid=74824722
***Type of policy violation: False accusations of engaging in disruptive activities, trying to enforce double standards against me, and implicitly lying about me using sockpuppets. No attempt to point out his vote to me was ever made, so as to prevent me from providing diffs to show my side of the "case."

===Mackensen===
*User:]

**Page:]
***'''Diff''': http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3ARequests_for_checkuser%2FCase%2FYa_ya_ya_ya_ya_ya&diff=74728367&oldid=74710126
***Type of policy violation:Lyingly implies that he has confirmed I'm using sockpuppets, by interpreting Tchadienne is a sockpuppet I used. The fact that this edit was not, and still has not been reverted, and Mackensen still has not been blocked, is an outrage. An arbitration case isnt even necessary. He should be desysopped on this evidence alone.

''For the record:'' '''The last fucking time I edited under the Tchadienne account was August 9.''' Check my ] and stop peddling this lie.

**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74782811&oldid=74782254
***Type of policy violation: Deliberate misinterpretation of the concept of "block evasion"

**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74800280&oldid=74797250
***Type of policy violation: Makes his vendetta against me, and his desire to violate the right to vanish, abundantly clear

**Page:
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3ARequests_for_checkuser%2FCase%2FChacor&diff=74725946&oldid=74701055
***Type of policy violation: Attempt to coverup Chacor's sockpuppetry, ]

===Ryulong===
*]
**Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Vicente_Fox&diff=74678246&oldid=74678221
***Type of policy violation: ], ], ], ] (in the sense that he is insisting Hseldon10 owns this page), and false accusations of vandalism against ]

**Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:208.180.242.96&oldid=74678249
***Type of policy violation: Falsely accusing ] of vandalism

**Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74693671&oldid=74690133
***Type of policy violation: ]. I wanted to thank him for a particularly good edit to a Japan-related article.

===Thatcher131===
*User:]
**Page:]
**Diff:http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3ARequests_for_checkuser%2FCase%2FYa_ya_ya_ya_ya_ya&diff=74637099&oldid=74636617
***Type of policy violation: Incorrect interpretation of ], though this was not intentional, and may have come from not realizing this case largely involved WP:BLP violations

===Mike Halterman===
*User:]
**Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3ARequests_for_checkuser%2FCase%2FChacor&diff=74649302&oldid=74649062
***Type of policy violation: Lyingly states I have some sort of "grievance against Chacor." Instructs users to go by double standards and ignore my request for a Checkuser proving Chacor's sockpuppetry.

**'''Diff''': http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3ARequests_for_checkuser%2FCase%2FChacor&diff=74650343&oldid=74649886
***Type of policy violation: Blocks me for '''48 hours for "disruption"''' while leaving the door open for an ''extension''. This act '''demands an immediate desysopping'''.

*Page:]
**Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74653272&oldid=74653083
***Type of policy violation: After he indefinitely blocked me, he posted this: '''"He wasn't using the blocking time for what I intended, instead trying to stir up more shit with myself, Chacor, and other editors. ] ] 03:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"'''

*Page:]
**Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=74667583&oldid=74667538
**Type:After Bunchograpes, a user I have never, and probably will never get along with, pointed out that indefinitely blocking me for three edits to my talkpage was "unjustified," Mike H refuses to adjust the block and incorrectly uses the terminology "rollback" demonstrating a bizarre ignorance of the most basic of admin tools.

===Lar===
*User:]
**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3AFreestylefrappe&diff=74913628&oldid=74905189
***Type of policy violation: ], ], ], trying to coverup the evidence I have so far presented

===Tony Sidaway===
*User:]
**Page:]
***Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3AFreestylefrappe&diff=74914410&oldid=74914302
***Type of policy violation: ], false accusations of sockpuppeteering, attempt to coverup evidence

==Diff for CBDunkerson's viewing==
Yep CBD, you sure were right about the willingness to follow policy on ]. That must explain this edit, hmm?

==Unblock now==
{{unblock reviewed|I evaded the last block how exactly? Under what account exactly? You can prove this which diffs exactly?|decline=Per ] presented at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 13:48, 10 September 2006 (UTC)}}

== Well that makes the case, doesn't it? ==
Instead of addressing the question, it just gets added to the list. An even stronger argument as far as I can see that you're just out to cause disruption here instead of address the issues that have been raised about your behaviour and change to being a productive editor and contributor. ++]: ]/] 15:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
:What exactly is the question? TenOfAllTrades refused to provide his email, insisting that this was more transparent. He challenged me to provide my evidence, so I have. You engage in personal attacks and incivility, and expect to be exempt from Misplaced Pages's policies because you are an administrator. Tony Sidaway lied about me being a proven sockpuppeteer, and deleted my evidence, so his actions are added to the list. ] 15:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
::The question is, why should the litany of alleged abuses above, completely one sided and (for the ones I spot checked) completely without basis in fact, be allowed to remain on a user page? They, in toto, form an attack page, which we don't allow. You can make your case civilly, sure, but this manner isn't it. If you think you have a case, there are mechanisms for dispute resolution. Diatribes on user pages are not part of that mechanism. Especially when you delete responses to them, you don't get to have screeds of this sort. ++]: ]/] 15:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
:::If you arent going to provide a serious response, dont respond at all. You dont have to a right to delete what is in effect an RFC page on the egregious violations on Vicente Fox. I have made my case civilly, I am not the one vandalizing other users' talk pages. As soon as this block wears off I'm going to formally start an RFC. At the end of which, assuming you dont abuse your powers, several administrators will be desysopped and WP:BLP will be enforced. If you are not just here to troll on my talkpage, alert CBDunkerson that WP:BLP is being violated once again on Vicente Fox. See the link I provided for CBDunkerson above. ] 15:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:12, 17 September 2006

Administrative abuse, policy violations, and vandalism

The following is an ongoing list of users who have either violated policy, abused their administrative power, or just outright vandalized Misplaced Pages in the Vicente Fox incident.

Bunchograpes

Joseph Solis in Australia

Green caterpillar

Hseldon10

Chacor

Captainktainer

Pgk

Centrx

TenOfAllTrades

Mindspillage

Mackensen

For the record: The last fucking time I edited under the Tchadienne account was August 9. Check my contribs and stop peddling this lie.

Ryulong

Thatcher131

Mike Halterman

Lar

Tony Sidaway

Diff for CBDunkerson's viewing

Yep CBD, you sure were right about the willingness to follow policy on Vicente Fox. That must explain this edit, hmm?

Unblock now

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Freestylefrappe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I evaded the last block how exactly? Under what account exactly? You can prove this which diffs exactly?

Decline reason:

Per evidence presented at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents --  Netsnipe  ►  13:48, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well that makes the case, doesn't it?

Instead of addressing the question, it just gets added to the list. An even stronger argument as far as I can see that you're just out to cause disruption here instead of address the issues that have been raised about your behaviour and change to being a productive editor and contributor. ++Lar: t/c 15:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

What exactly is the question? TenOfAllTrades refused to provide his email, insisting that this was more transparent. He challenged me to provide my evidence, so I have. You engage in personal attacks and incivility, and expect to be exempt from Misplaced Pages's policies because you are an administrator. Tony Sidaway lied about me being a proven sockpuppeteer, and deleted my evidence, so his actions are added to the list. freestylefrappe 15:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
The question is, why should the litany of alleged abuses above, completely one sided and (for the ones I spot checked) completely without basis in fact, be allowed to remain on a user page? They, in toto, form an attack page, which we don't allow. You can make your case civilly, sure, but this manner isn't it. If you think you have a case, there are mechanisms for dispute resolution. Diatribes on user pages are not part of that mechanism. Especially when you delete responses to them, you don't get to have screeds of this sort. ++Lar: t/c 15:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
If you arent going to provide a serious response, dont respond at all. You dont have to a right to delete what is in effect an RFC page on the egregious violations on Vicente Fox. I have made my case civilly, I am not the one vandalizing other users' talk pages. As soon as this block wears off I'm going to formally start an RFC. At the end of which, assuming you dont abuse your powers, several administrators will be desysopped and WP:BLP will be enforced. If you are not just here to troll on my talkpage, alert CBDunkerson that WP:BLP is being violated once again on Vicente Fox. See the link I provided for CBDunkerson above. freestylefrappe 15:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)