Revision as of 13:39, 17 September 2006 view sourceHkelkar (talk | contribs)7,279 edits OK, so not attack. It's still loaded POV from the title and redundant given that another similar article already exists← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:44, 17 September 2006 view source ERcheck (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators44,317 edits changed db tag to prod - does not meet CSD - see talk pageNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{dated prod|concern = {{{concern|There have been no significant edits to the article in months. The article has few sourced statements, and it cites information out of context. Statistical data from questionable sources are deliberately slanted to make India look like the poorest country in the world (a patently false claim). There is no precedent on wikipedia to single out the poverty situation of any country as an article, while statistics show that poverty situation in some other countries are far worse than in India. Why is India being singled out?Plus, the pictures are placed out of context and have no text in the articles to support their placement. As it stands (and has stood for months), it is an anti-India attack article, offensive and disguting. There is a better article ] where the matter of poverty in India can be put in at length so this article is also redundant with a POV title.}}}|month = September|day = 17|year = 2006|time = 13:44|timestamp = 20060917134432}} | ||
{{Cleanup-date|July 2006}} | {{Cleanup-date|July 2006}} | ||
{{expand}} | {{expand}} |
Revision as of 13:44, 17 September 2006
This article may have been previously nominated for deletion: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Poverty in India exists. It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:
If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it. This message has remained in place for seven days, so the article may be deleted without further notice. Find sources: "Poverty in India" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTORPRODExpired+%5B%5BWP%3APROD%7CPROD%5D%5D%2C+concern+was%3A+There+have+been+no+significant+edits+to+the+article+in+months.+The+article+has+few+sourced+statements%2C+and+it+cites+information+out+of+context.+Statistical+data+from+questionable+sources+are+deliberately+slanted+to+make+India+look+like+the+poorest+country+in+the+world+%28a+patently+false+claim%29.+There+is+no+precedent+on+wikipedia+to+single+out+the+poverty+situation+of+any+country+as+an+article%2C+while+statistics+show+that+poverty+situation+in+some+other+countries+are+far+worse+than+in+India.+Why+is+India+being+singled+out%3FPlus%2C+the+pictures+are+placed+out+of+context+and+have+no+text+in+the+articles+to+support+their+placement.+As+it+stands+%28and+has+stood+for+months%29%2C+it+is+an++anti-India+attack+article%2C+offensive+and+disguting.+There+is+a+better+article+%5B%5BStandard+of+living+in+India%5D%5D+where+the+matter+of+poverty+in+India+can+be+put+in+at+length+so+this+article+is+also+redundant+with+a+POV+title.Expired ], concern was: There have been no significant edits to the article in months. The article has few sourced statements, and it cites information out of context. Statistical data from questionable sources are deliberately slanted to make India look like the poorest country in the world (a patently false claim). There is no precedent on wikipedia to single out the poverty situation of any country as an article, while statistics show that poverty situation in some other countries are far worse than in India. Why is India being singled out?Plus, the pictures are placed out of context and have no text in the articles to support their placement. As it stands (and has stood for months), it is an anti-India attack article, offensive and disguting. There is a better article Standard of living in India where the matter of poverty in India can be put in at length so this article is also redundant with a POV title. Nominator: Please consider notifying the author/project: {{subst:proposed deletion notify|Poverty in India|concern=There have been no significant edits to the article in months. The article has few sourced statements, and it cites information out of context. Statistical data from questionable sources are deliberately slanted to make India look like the poorest country in the world (a patently false claim). There is no precedent on wikipedia to single out the poverty situation of any country as an article, while statistics show that poverty situation in some other countries are far worse than in India. Why is India being singled out?Plus, the pictures are placed out of context and have no text in the articles to support their placement. As it stands (and has stood for months), it is an anti-India attack article, offensive and disguting. There is a better article ] where the matter of poverty in India can be put in at length so this article is also redundant with a POV title.}} ~~~~ Timestamp: 20060917134432 13:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Administrators: delete |
You must add a |reason=
parameter to this Cleanup template – replace it with {{Cleanup|July 2006|reason=<Fill reason here>}}
, or remove the Cleanup template.
Poverty in the world
Hunger in the world
Number of undernourished people (million) in 2001-2003, according to the FAO, the following countries had 5 million or more undernourished people :
Country | Number of Undernourished (million) |
---|---|
India | 212.0 |
China | 150.0 |
Bangladesh | 43.1 |
Democratic Republic of Congo | 37.0 |
Pakistan | 35.2 |
Ethiopia | 31.5 |
Tanzania | 16.1 |
Philippines | 15.2 |
Brazil | 14.4 |
Indonesia | 13.8 |
Vietnam | 13.8 |
Thailand | 13.4 |
Nigeria | 11.5 |
Kenya | 9.7 |
Sudan | 8.8 |
Mozambique | 8.3 |
North Korea | 7.9 |
Yemen | 7.1 |
Madagascar | 6.5 |
Colombia | 5.9 |
Zimbabwe | 5.7 |
Mexico | 5.1 |
Zambia | 5.1 |
Angola | 5.0 |
Poverty in India
Capitalism has never worked for the lower-classes, and has mainly helped the 75-80% of Indians that live above the poverty line, especially the middle class, upper middle class, and the upper class. The income in all three of these classes has constantly been increasing in the last 3 years, and at a much faster rate than the inrease in income of the poor and the lower class, which has increased income inequality over the last 25 years: The richest 10% in India now control more than 40% of all income, while the poorest 20% only earn 8.1%. However, poverty is constanly decreasing, and so is the now less than 5% of Indians who live on no more than US$2 a day,or about 50 million people.