| Revision as of 14:28, 17 September 2006 editFeydey (talk | contribs)Administrators36,979 edits from User page← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:30, 17 September 2006 edit undoWLU (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,243 editsm added original contextNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ==Talk== | ==Talk== | ||
| I mostly edit for clarity, grammar and good referencing, I'm a new wikipedian, so I'm still learning. | |||
| ] 13:09, 4 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| and anyone who believes that... I've got a bridge for sale in Brooklyn... | and anyone who believes that... I've got a bridge for sale in Brooklyn... | ||
| ] 06:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC) | ] 06:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:30, 17 September 2006
Anyone want to discuss my edits? Do so on my discussion page. I'll justify why I do what I do.
WLU 18:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk
I mostly edit for clarity, grammar and good referencing, I'm a new wikipedian, so I'm still learning.
WLU 13:09, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
and anyone who believes that... I've got a bridge for sale in Brooklyn...
Mystar 06:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Mystar, please allow me to take this time to thank you for improving my editing. I now reference pretty much everything that I write. You should try it. And thanks for your clarification of the War of Light and Shadow page, I think you did improve it. WLU 13:49, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Yes I know I did, that woudl be "why" I edited it. I hope that you are aware that "is" why people edit..or you should be aware of it for future referance
Mystar 12:54, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Why do you put stuff in quotations? It doesn't make any sense. Did you know that using stacked apostrophes will give you different effects? Two of them results in italics while three gives you bold. Is that what you are going for? Reference has four 'e's and no 'a'. Have you read the policy on bios of current people, where it stresses the importance of accurate, verifiable information? Have you read any of the policies on wikipedia? They are the reason I stopped editing with an agenda and started editing for accuracy. You are doing no-one any service by continuously putting unverifiable information on the page. You definitely know the TG stuff and you are helpful in expanding the entries on his books, but the continuous reverts to unsourced information is making the bio page worse. Please read the policies, they will help you become a better contributor. And get the chip off of your shoulder, I find it annoying. WLU 14:26, 17 September 2006 (UTC)