Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 12:53, 6 February 2017

I'm the only user on this account and if I find someone that is stalking me I will report it, you know who are You have no right to dictate my life and stop bullying me.

Block notice

MightyDinoPower15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm the only user on this account no one else MightyDinoPower15 (talk) 5:25 pm, Today (UTC+2)

Decline reason:

You are blocked for WP:edit warring. How about you say something about that in your unblock request? Vanjagenije (talk) 16:17, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2016

You are not allowed to edit Misplaced Pages while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  Vanjagenije (talk) 19:44, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Template:Z7

MightyDinoPower15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16267 was submitted on Aug 02, 2016 19:55:36. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

I have unlocked your talk page so you can retract the legal threat you have made at the top. Once you have removed it, you may be unblocked. Katie 13:32, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Sock puppetry case

We are not saying that more than one person is using this account or the IP address (47.148.133.112).

We are saying that you seem to be editing as both "MightyDinoPower15" and as 47.148.133.112 to try to avoid being stopped from making the same edit several times without talking about it with other editors who do not agree with you.

Making the same (or similar) edit several times without trying to come to an agreement is called edit warring and is not allowed.

Trying to avoid it by using more than one account or IP is called sock puppetry and is not allowed.

Please talk about the problem at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/MightyDinoPower15 or you will probably be blocked from editing again. - SummerPhD 05:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

There is no we there is only you— Preceding unsigned comment added by MightyDinoPower15 (talk • contribs) 12:45, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

There is me, the admin who blocked you for the same problem before and the admin who will decide this time. We are saying your are may not edit while logged out to avoid scrutiny.

You still have not addressed the concern at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/MightyDinoPower15. - SummerPhD 02:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:MightyDinoPower15, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. WNYY98 (talk) 04:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

The reason I've blocked you is because you've logged out and continued to revert editors. Editing while logged out is not forbidden, but you must not engage in disruption while logged out, such as edit warring. This gives the impression that you're attempting to evade scrutiny and possibly mislead editors into believing multiple people oppose their edits. If you get involved in a content dispute, you should discuss it on the talk page, preferably from your logged-in account. If you accidentally log out, you can follow the instructions at WP:LOGOUT. It is difficult to tell whether you understand this or not; your statements could be taken as a denial that you've edited while logged out or as a misunderstanding of what you've been accused of. If you do not understand this, I will attempt to better explain it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

What gives you the right to this I didn't do anything wrong

A "revert" is whenever you undo the work of another editor. One way to do this is by clicking the "undo" button. You apparently reverted someone under both this account and 47.148.133.112 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). This can give people the impression that two different people were involved – MightyDinoPower15 and 47.148.133.112. However, it seems obvious that both of these accounts are you. It can look like you're trying to hide your identity when you revert people as an IP editor. They might think, "Wow, two completely different people have proposed this edit. It must be very popular." The other problem is that Misplaced Pages has a policy, the three revert rule, which says that each editor can only revert a maximum of three times per day in each article. When editors log out and continue to revert as an IP editor, it can seem like they're trying to cheat this rule. Thus, it's best to do all your reverting under one account – preferably MightyDinoPower15. You can edit while logged out, but you can't give people the erroneous impression that two different people are editing the article. The most contentious issue is, of course, when you revert people as an IP editor. If you do this accidentally, you could let people know it's you by logging into your account and saying so in an edit summary. I hope this explains the problem a little better. In any event, the best solution is always to talk to people on an article's talk page. Continually reverting people doesn't solve anything – whether you do it from MightyDinoPower15 or as an IP editor. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:23, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

I was just trying to help revert mistakes of others

They probably felt the same way, though. That's why discussing your edits on the talk page is often a better solution than continually reverting. Misplaced Pages works by consensus, which means that there needs to be some talking and discussing eventually. If everyone simply reverted all the time, there'd be wars all across Misplaced Pages, and nothing would ever get done. I know SummerPhDv2.0 well enough to say that she's a reasonable person. If you talk to her, she'll listen to you. She might not agree, but at least you'll have tried your best to discuss the matter – and that will keep you from getting blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Timeline of Star Trek without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If you feel there is a reason to remove material from an article, be sure to explain this in your edit summary. Otherwise your edit looks like simple vandalism. If other editors are likely to disagree with your change, it would be a good idea to discuss the change on the article's talk page. SummerPhD 00:55, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. - SummerPhD 03:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Please i don't take to kindly to threats And I didn't like the attitude.

I gave you a standard warning for deleting the comments of another user, which you did twice before I issued the warning. These warnings are approved by the Misplaced Pages community. If you don't like getting them, then please stop violating Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Thanks. - BilCat (talk)

You're worse then a power hungry dictator. Things need to chage around here or else there will be trouble.