Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Wolfchild (band): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:59, 18 September 2006 editPJM (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,909 editsm []: delete← Previous edit Revision as of 13:52, 18 September 2006 edit undoRecury (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,957 edits []: del voteNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:


*'''Delete''' per ]. ] 11:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per ]. ] 11:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', maybe the band is good but they don't seem popular enough yet for an article. Read ]. ] 13:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:52, 18 September 2006

Wolfchild (band)

Author contested speedy but has been significantly improved since then. Still don't think it meets WP:MUSIC. MER-C 09:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

So what should be done to the article, then? The appearance is good now, but I take it that the band is not good enough :) ? Well it's quite true that the band is not Metallica-big-and-famous, but it's done a quite notable career to their first album and recording deal.

Categories: