| Revision as of 15:33, 18 September 2006 editInShaneee (talk | contribs)15,956 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:30, 18 September 2006 edit undoNishkid64 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users51,999 edits →[]: CommentNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| *'''Blow away''' (i.e. '''delete''') per above. ] 08:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Blow away''' (i.e. '''delete''') per above. ] 08:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. I added some references. Power generating facilities can be notable, and this one has attracted some independent coverage. --] (] | ] 08:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. I added some references. Power generating facilities can be notable, and this one has attracted some independent coverage. --] (] | ] 08:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| **'''Comment'''. I hardly think that a simple one line mention of the wind farm in a USAToday article or even the IBEW Journal could be considered as a real news coverage. --] 21:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep'''. It's a tourist attraction and a major business investment in the region/state. To my mind the visibility of wind farms makes it hard for them ''not'' to be notable, and certainly in a local context it seems strange to leave it out. --] | ] 09:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. It's a tourist attraction and a major business investment in the region/state. To my mind the visibility of wind farms makes it hard for them ''not'' to be notable, and certainly in a local context it seems strange to leave it out. --] | ] 09:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' A power facility is a power facility, no matter how pretty or expensive it is. --] 15:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' A power facility is a power facility, no matter how pretty or expensive it is. --] 15:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:30, 18 September 2006
Cerro Gordo Wind Farm
NN.... uh.... wind farm. Delete. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:09, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Just another small power facility Bwithh 04:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator and User:Bwithh. JIP | Talk 07:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Blow away (i.e. delete) per above. MER-C 08:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I added some references. Power generating facilities can be notable, and this one has attracted some independent coverage. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 08:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. I hardly think that a simple one line mention of the wind farm in a USAToday article or even the IBEW Journal could be considered as a real news coverage. --Nishkid64 21:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It's a tourist attraction and a major business investment in the region/state. To my mind the visibility of wind farms makes it hard for them not to be notable, and certainly in a local context it seems strange to leave it out. --Dhartung | Talk 09:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete A power facility is a power facility, no matter how pretty or expensive it is. --InShaneee 15:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)