Misplaced Pages

Illegal number: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:16, 3 February 2017 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,556,584 editsm Dating maintenance tags: {{Jargon-statement}}← Previous edit Revision as of 17:01, 11 February 2017 edit undo2601:2c7:8103:3ab0:7493:3bf9:8fad:2f23 (talk) Flags and steganography: Fixed typoTags: canned edit summary Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
== Flags and steganography == == Flags and steganography ==
] ]
As a protest of the DeCSS case, many people created "]" versions of the illegal information (i.e. hiding them in some form in flags etc.). Dave Touretzky of Carnegie Mellon University created a "Gallery of DeCSS descramblers". In the ], a "] flag" was created. Some illegal numbers are so short that a simple flag (pictured to the right) could be created by using triples of ] as describing ] colors. The argument is that if short numbers can be made illegal, then anything based on those numbers also becomes illegal, like simple patterns of colors, etc. As a protest of the DeCSS case, many people created "]" versions of the illegal information (i.e. hiding them in some form in flags etc.). Dave boiTouretzky of Carnegie Mellon University created a "Gallery of DeCSS descramblers". In the ], a "] flag" was created. Some illegal numbers are so short that a simple flag (pictured to the right) could be created by using triples of ] as describing ] colors. The argument is that if short numbers can be made illegal, then anything based on those numbers also becomes illegal, like simple patterns of colors, etc.


In the '']'' case, many bloggers (including one at ]) made a "new free speech flag" in homage to the AACS free speech flag. Most of these were based on the "dongle key" rather than the keys Hotz actually released.<ref> by Ben S, Yale Law Tech, 2011 March</ref> Several users of other websites posted similar flags.<ref>See ] description.</ref> In the '']'' case, many bloggers (including one at ]) made a "new free speech flag" in homage to the AACS free speech flag. Most of these were based on the "dongle key" rather than the keys Hotz actually released.<ref> by Ben S, Yale Law Tech, 2011 March</ref> Several users of other websites posted similar flags.<ref>See ] description.</ref>

Revision as of 17:01, 11 February 2017

Free Speech flag, from the HD DVD AACS case

An illegal number is a number that represents information which is illegal to possess, utter, propagate, or otherwise transmit in some legal jurisdiction. Any piece of digital information is representable as a number; consequently, if communicating a specific set of information is illegal in some way, then the number may be illegal as well.

Background

A number may represent some type of classified information or trade secret, legal to possess only by certain authorized persons. An AACS encryption key that came to prominence in May 2007 is an example of a number claimed to be a secret, and whose publication or inappropriate possession is claimed to be illegal in the United States. It allegedly assists in the decryption of any HD DVD or Blu-ray Disc released before this date. The issuers of a series of cease-and-desist letters claim that the key itself is therefore a copyright circumvention device, and that publishing the key violates Title 1 of the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

In part of the DeCSS court order and in the AACS legal notices, the claimed protection for these numbers is based on their mere possession and the value or potential use of the numbers. This makes their status and legal issues surrounding their distribution quite distinct from that of copyright infringement.

Any image file or an executable program can be regarded as simply a very large binary number. In certain jurisdictions, there are images that are illegal to possess, due to obscenity or secrecy/classified status, so the corresponding numbers could be illegal.

In 2011 Sony sued George Hotz and members of fail0verflow for jailbreaking the PlayStation 3. Part of the lawsuit complaint was that they had published PS3 keys. Sony also threatened to sue anyone who distributed the keys. Sony later accidentally tweeted an older dongle key through its fictional Kevin Butler character.

Flags and steganography

The PlayStation 3 edition of the free speech flag

As a protest of the DeCSS case, many people created "steganographic" versions of the illegal information (i.e. hiding them in some form in flags etc.). Dave boiTouretzky of Carnegie Mellon University created a "Gallery of DeCSS descramblers". In the AACS encryption key controversy, a "free speech flag" was created. Some illegal numbers are so short that a simple flag (pictured to the right) could be created by using triples of components as describing red-green-blue colors. The argument is that if short numbers can be made illegal, then anything based on those numbers also becomes illegal, like simple patterns of colors, etc.

In the Sony Computer Entertainment v. Hotz case, many bloggers (including one at Yale Law School) made a "new free speech flag" in homage to the AACS free speech flag. Most of these were based on the "dongle key" rather than the keys Hotz actually released. Several users of other websites posted similar flags.

Other examples

There are other contexts in which smaller numbers have run afoul of laws or regulations, or drawn the attention of authorities.

In 2007, the Belgian minister of the Interior wrote a letter to the Belgian Football Association asking them to forbid fans in the stadiums from wearing football shirts displaying the numbers 88 and 18 without a name, due to the connotation those numbers were deemed to have with Adolf Hitler in right-wing fan circles.

In 2012 it was reported that the numbers 89, 6, and 4 each became banned search terms on search engines in China, because of the date (1989-06-04) of the June 4th Incident in Tienanmen Square.

Due to the association with gangs, in 2012 a school district in Colorado banned the wearing of jerseys that bore the numbers 18, 14, or 13 (or the reverse, 81, 41, or 31).

A Swedish student's flat was visited by police in 2015 after the number "21" (that appeared on two balloons in the shape of the digits "2" and "1" marking her age) was mistaken by a passer-by for the letters "IS", which were suspected of signifying the Islamic State group.

See also

References

  1. ^ Phil Carmody. "An Executable Prime Number?". Archived from the original on 2007-03-29. Retrieved 2007-05-08. Maybe I was reading something between the lines that wasn't there, but if arbitrary programs could be expressed as primes, the immediate conclusion is that all programs, including ones some people wished didn't exist, can too. I.e. the so called 'circumvention devices' of which my previous prime exploit was an example.
  2. Thomas C Greene (2001-03-19). "DVD descrambler encoded in 'illegal' prime number". The Register. Retrieved 2007-05-08. The question, of course, is whether an interesting number is illegal merely because it can be used to encode a contraband program.
  3. "The Prime Glossary: illegal prime". Retrieved 2007-05-09. The bottom line: If distributing code is illegal, and these numbers contain (or are) the code, doesn't that make these number illegal?
  4. "AACS licensor complains of posted key". Chilling Effects. Retrieved 2007-05-08. Illegal Offering of Processing Key to Circumvent AACS Copyright Protection are thereby providing and offering to the public a technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof that is primarily designed, produced, or marketed for the purpose of circumventing the technological protection measures afforded by AACS (hereafter, the "circumvention offering"). Doing so constitutes a violation of the anti-circumvention provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (the "DMCA")
  5. ^ Memorandum Order, in MPAA v. Reimerdes, Corley and Kazan (NY; Feb. 2, 2000)
  6. "Prime Curios: 48565...29443 (1401-digits)". Retrieved 2007-05-09. What folks often forget is a program (any file actually) is a string of bits (binary digits)—so every program is a number.
  7. "Criminal Justice Act 1988 + amendments". Retrieved 2007-05-09.
  8. Wells, David (2011). "Illegal prime". Prime Numbers: The Most Mysterious Figures in Math. Wiley. pp. 126–127. ISBN 9781118045718.
  9. Sony follows up, officially sues Geohot and fail0verflow over PS3 jailbreak. Nilay Patel, Engadget (2011-01-12). Retrieved on 2011-02-16.
  10. "Sony lawyers now targeting anyone who posts PlayStation 3 hack". Arstechnica. February 8, 2011.
  11. "PS3 'jailbreak code' retweeted by Sony's Kevin Butler". Engadget. February 9, 2011.
  12. 46-dc-ea-d3-17-fe-45-d8-09-23-eb-97-e4-95-64-10-d4-cd-b2-c2 by Ben S, Yale Law Tech, 2011 March
  13. See File:Free-speech-flag-ps3.svg description.
  14. "Rugnummers 18 en 88 in opspraak" (in Dutch). V-Bal.nl. 2007-01-23. Archived from the original on February 25, 2007. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  15. MacKinnon, Mark (2012-06-04). "Banned in China on Tiananmen anniversary: 6, 4, 89 and 'today'". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 2015-03-09.
  16. Meyer, Jeremy P. (2012-09-05). "Greeley school ban on gang numbers includes Peyton Manning's 18". The Denver Post. Retrieved 2015-03-09.
  17. Toppa, Sabrina (2015-02-25). "Swedish Police Raid Apartment After Mistaking 21st Birthday Party Balloons for ISIS Initials". Time. Retrieved 2015-03-09.

External links

Categories: