| Revision as of 20:00, 18 September 2006 editIsotope23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,870 editsm →[]: '← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:50, 19 September 2006 edit undoLinaMishima (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,419 edits →[]: returning briefly to commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| :--] 15:52, 18 September 2006 (]]]) | :--] 15:52, 18 September 2006 (]]]) | ||
| *'''Delete''' I've got a copy of the details for later merging. More importantly, the details on this langauge are hard to find, and the article itself is seemingly a raw stub. Unlikely to be verifiable. ] 02:50, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:50, 19 September 2006
BAK programming language
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment There have been many previous esoteric programming language-related AfDs, often with mass nominations. Not all of the following will be relevant, but many may be.
- Delete, no demonstrated notability.--Isotope23 19:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
|
Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.
Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates:
|
- Delete I've got a copy of the details for later merging. More importantly, the details on this langauge are hard to find, and the article itself is seemingly a raw stub. Unlikely to be verifiable. LinaMishima 02:50, 19 September 2006 (UTC)