| Revision as of 21:51, 18 September 2006 editNishkid64 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users51,999 edits →[]: User left an unsigned comment. Also, delete.← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:33, 19 September 2006 edit undoKappa (talk | contribs)36,858 edits →[]: cmtNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| *'''Delete''', maybe the band is good but they don't seem popular enough yet for an article. Read ]. ] 13:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', maybe the band is good but they don't seem popular enough yet for an article. Read ]. ] 13:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per ]. --] 21:51, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per ]. --] 21:51, 18 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *Comment: The band looks like it might pass "Has been featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media (excludes things like school newspapers, personal blogs, etc...). " If it doesn't, recreate the article when you can prove that it does. ] 07:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:33, 19 September 2006
Wolfchild (band)
Author contested speedy but has been significantly improved since then. Still don't think it meets WP:MUSIC. MER-C 09:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
So what should be done to the article, then? The appearance is good now, but I take it that the band is not good enough :) ? Well it's quite true that the band is not Metallica-big-and-famous, but it's done a quite notable career to their first album and recording deal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimtuomi (talk • contribs)
- Delete per WP:NMG. PJM 11:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, maybe the band is good but they don't seem popular enough yet for an article. Read WP:MUSIC. Recury 13:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:MUSIC. --Nishkid64 21:51, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: The band looks like it might pass "Has been featured in multiple non-trivial published works in reliable and reputable media (excludes things like school newspapers, personal blogs, etc...). " If it doesn't, recreate the article when you can prove that it does. Kappa 07:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC)