| Revision as of 03:14, 19 September 2006 editCuchullain (talk | contribs)Administrators83,892 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:19, 19 September 2006 edit undoTherealmikelvee (talk | contribs)726 edits →SplitNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ==Split== | ==Split== | ||
| This article should remain discussing both Lamechs. It does not say they ''were'' the same necessarily, it merely discusses what the Bible has to say about both of them. I merged them together because originally, the ] was the only developed one; the other Lamech was only mentioned on an unneccessary disambiguation page. There isn't enough information on Lamech, descendant of Seth to warrant his own article, but he needs to be discussed. Would putting this page in ] satisfy you?--] ]/] 03:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | This article should remain discussing both Lamechs. It does not say they ''were'' the same necessarily, it merely discusses what the Bible has to say about both of them. I merged them together because originally, the ] was the only developed one; the other Lamech was only mentioned on an unneccessary disambiguation page. There isn't enough information on Lamech, descendant of Seth to warrant his own article, but he needs to be discussed. Would putting this page in ] satisfy you?--] ]/] 03:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Well, there are countless traditions about both Lamechs. Personally, I think if we can find enough information about each through traditions, they should be listed on seperate articles. ] 22:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:19, 19 September 2006
The Lamech, descendant of Cain article says the two Lamechs are the same. Should this be a redirect?--Cuchullain 00:26, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- They are not necessarily the same person. The redirect is extremely unfortunate and should be reverted to the what this article was before. Critical scholarship and Grammatical scholarship are two different views. --Ep9206 22:42, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Split
This article should remain discussing both Lamechs. It does not say they were the same necessarily, it merely discusses what the Bible has to say about both of them. I merged them together because originally, the Lamech, descendant of Cain was the only developed one; the other Lamech was only mentioned on an unneccessary disambiguation page. There isn't enough information on Lamech, descendant of Seth to warrant his own article, but he needs to be discussed. Would putting this page in Category:Multiple people satisfy you?--Cúchullain /c 03:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well, there are countless traditions about both Lamechs. Personally, I think if we can find enough information about each through traditions, they should be listed on seperate articles. mikey 22:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)